Back to results

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Structural case on adjuncts

Abstract

dc:description.abstract

This dissertation investigates how case is assigned to nominal adverbials dubbed durative and multiplicative in Korean. These adverbials express the duration of an event, or the number of times an event is repeated. In transitive, unergative, and unaccusative constructions, the adverbial is marked with accusative case. In psychological predicate constructions, the adverbial is marked with nominative case. Interestingly, in passive and inchoative constructions (grouped together under the term nonactive), the adverbial allows both nominative and accusative case. I derive these patterns from a specific model of Voice, and a model of successive-cyclic Dependent Case. I first argue in favor of a Voice system that treats passive and inchoative constructions as syntactically equivalent: whether a nonactive construction is passive or inchoative is determined by the feature specification on Voice (Kallulli 2007). Furthermore, this nonactive Voice head introduces an implicit agent (for passives) or causer (for inchoatives), which can be optionally realized as a PP. This agent/causer at Spec, VoiceP competes with the theme argument to move to Spec, TP. Hence, there are two different structures that can arise in nonactive constructions. The other constructions that do not show case optionality lack this competition. In transitive, unergative, and unaccusative constructions, there is no implicit agent/causer at Spec, TP to compete with the theme argument. In psychological predicate constructions, the experiencer argument introduced at Spec, ApplP acts as an intervener and blocks the theme argument from competing with the implicit agent/causer. My model of successive-cyclic Dependent Case explains how the different structures result in different case patterns. It is a revised version of Levin’s (2017) original model, whereby case evaluation occurs not only at the end of the syntactic derivation but at the Spell-out of each phase. However, my version of the model involves a more relaxed locality constraint for dependent case assignment. I demonstrate how my model can not only derive the case marking patterns of durative and multiplicative adverbials, but can also account for other case phenomena in Korean such as case stacking and multiple nominative constructions.

Degree

thesis:*
Name thesis:degree_name
Doctoral
Department dc:contributor.department
Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Linguistics and Philosophy
Grantor dc:publisher
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Year dc:date.issued
2024

Author and committee

dc:creator, dc:contributor.*
Author dc:creator
  • Jou, Eunsun
Advisor dc:contributor.advisor
  • Pesetsky, David

Rights

dc:rights
Statement dc:rights
  • Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)
  • Copyright retained by author(s)

Identifiers

dc:identifier.*
Handle dc:identifier.uri
https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/157869
OAI identifier oai:identifier
oai:dspace.mit.edu:1721.1/157869

Chain of custody

source
Harvested from
MIT
Base URL
dspace.mit.edu/oai/request
Last updated
2026-07-22
Source record
OAI-PMH GetRecord
related terms
citation

Jou, Eunsun. Structural case on adjuncts. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2024. https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/157869