Tectonics of the semi-permanent: Reassembling fit-out architecture

In New York engineer Reginald Pelham Bolton’s 1911 obsolescence study “Building for Profit: Principles Governing the Economic Improvement of Real Estate”, he foretold a truth that remains today, that “the useful or economic existence of all classes of buildings, in the rapid march of modern conditions, is constantly shortening” (Bolton, 68). He details how the parts of buildings lose value at different rates—as they physically deteriorate, materials wear and things fall out of style, but even more quickly, he notes, do our structures become economically obsolete. Then and still today the durability of building materials is the least of our concerns when considering functional obsolescence. The physical is almost certain to exceed the economic durability of a building as a whole. Designers and developers recognize this gap between physical and economic obsolescence, and in response have called for a moratorium on new construction—opting instead to convert existing structures to meet changing programmatic demands. Yet in these conversions, we use the same extractive methods as new construction, filling existing frames and envelopes with non-structural light framing to differentiate the space inside. In this paradigm, to build inside an existing frame still relies first on the tool of demolition. The uneven wearing that Bolton wrote about in 1911, appears again in the iconic shearing layers diagram from Frank Duffy and Stewart Brand, who make a very similar economic argument, demonstrating that the economically fast-wearing interior layer accumulates the most investment over time, rebuilt on a cycle of every 5-10 years. We are facing a turning point in building; as of 2020, over 35% of total construction activity is renovation work, and we are making increasingly rapid changes to building function. This creates a paradigm of fit out architecture that answers unpredictability and shifting values with indeterminacy, perpetuating a cycle of repetitive building. This project takes the converted structure as its starting point, experimenting with disassembly, reassembly, and the boundaries between fit out and frame, sited within a larger material and economic framework that expands the definition of “value” beyond the monetary to include material resources embodied by a given structure.

Name thesis:degree_name

Master

Department dc:contributor.department

Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Architecture

Grantor dc:publisher

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Year dc:date.issued

2024

Author dc:creator

• Schnitzler, Jenna

Advisor dc:contributor.advisor

• Modesitt, Adam

Statement dc:rights

• In Copyright - Educational Use Permitted
• Copyright retained by author(s)

Licence dc:rights.uri

• https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC-EDU/1.0/

Handle dc:identifier.uri

https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/157358

OAI identifier oai:identifier

oai:dspace.mit.edu:1721.1/157358