{"id":{"repo_id":"mit","oai_identifier":"oai:dspace.mit.edu:1721.1/143336"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/mit/oai:dspace.mit.edu:1721.1/143336","repository":{"repo_id":"mit","name":"MIT","base_url":"https://dspace.mit.edu/oai/request"},"display":{"title":"New techniques in low-Q² elastic electron-proton scattering measurements and the proton radius extraction","abstract":"The proton charge radius is a fundamental property of the proton, sensitive to its charge distribution. The proton radius puzzle is the discrepancy between the muonic hydrogen spectroscopy measurement of 0.84 fm and the consensus of 0.88 fm from two traditional methods, electron-proton scattering and electronic hydrogen spectroscopy. A recent electron-proton scattering experiment, PRad, measured a smaller radius but also large electric form factor values within 0.02 ≤ Q² ≤ 0.06 (GeV/c)² conflicting with previous experiments. Motivated by those issues, we developed an innovative background-free target system, including a windowless gas jet target, a beam halo collimator and an active beam halo veto, to measure the proton electric form factor at momentum transfers of 0.01 ≤ Q² ≤ 0.065 (GeV/c)². The experiment was conducted in early 2020 at the three-spectrometer facility of the A1-collaboration at the Mainz Microtron in Mainz, Germany. Due to the COVID-19 lockdown, we measured the cross section only up to Q² = 0.043 (GeV/c)² with limited statistics. Although our form factor data cannot give a definitive answer to the form factor discrepancy and the proton radius puzzle yet, our work demonstrated the feasibility of such a background-free target design and we believe that further data taking with this technique can help to resolve the radius puzzle. In this work, we also study the extraction of the proton charge radius using non-parametric models. We demonstrate that the kernel ridge regression and the Gaussian process have similar levels of performance compared to the traditional function fitting approaches. Our extracted values from different data sets still show the discrepancy of the proton charge radius, supporting the point of view that the discrepancy originates from the data itself instead of the extraction method.","abstract_html":"The proton charge radius is a fundamental property of the proton, sensitive to its charge distribution. The proton radius puzzle is the discrepancy between the muonic hydrogen spectroscopy measurement of 0.84 fm and the consensus of 0.88 fm from two traditional methods, electron-proton scattering and electronic hydrogen spectroscopy. A recent electron-proton scattering experiment, PRad, measured a smaller radius but also large electric form factor values within 0.02 ≤ Q² ≤ 0.06 (GeV/c)² conflicting with previous experiments. Motivated by those issues, we developed an innovative background-free target system, including a windowless gas jet target, a beam halo collimator and an active beam halo veto, to measure the proton electric form factor at momentum transfers of 0.01 ≤ Q² ≤ 0.065 (GeV/c)². The experiment was conducted in early 2020 at the three-spectrometer facility of the A1-collaboration at the Mainz Microtron in Mainz, Germany. Due to the COVID-19 lockdown, we measured the cross section only up to Q² = 0.043 (GeV/c)² with limited statistics. Although our form factor data cannot give a definitive answer to the form factor discrepancy and the proton radius puzzle yet, our work demonstrated the feasibility of such a background-free target design and we believe that further data taking with this technique can help to resolve the radius puzzle. In this work, we also study the extraction of the proton charge radius using non-parametric models. We demonstrate that the kernel ridge regression and the Gaussian process have similar levels of performance compared to the traditional function fitting approaches. Our extracted values from different data sets still show the discrepancy of the proton charge radius, supporting the point of view that the discrepancy originates from the data itself instead of the extraction method.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Wang, Yimin"],"institution":"Massachusetts Institute of Technology","degree_name":"Doctoral","degree_level":null,"degree_discipline":null,"degree_department":"Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Physics","school":null,"contributors":[],"advisors":["Milner, Richard G."],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2022,"date_issued":"2022-02","date_published":"2022-02","updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:22:19Z","subjects":[],"languages":[],"rights":["In Copyright - Educational Use Permitted","Copyright MIT"],"rights_urls":["http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/143336","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier.uri"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor.advisor","label":"Advisor","values":["Milner, Richard G."]},{"key":"dc:contributor.department","label":"Department","values":["Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Physics"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Wang, Yimin"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date.accessioned","label":"Dc Date Accessioned","values":["2022-06-15T13:13:22Z"]},{"key":"dc:date.available","label":"Dc Date Available","values":["2022-06-15T13:13:22Z"]},{"key":"dc:date.issued","label":"Date","values":["2022-02"]},{"key":"dc:publisher","label":"Institution","values":["Massachusetts Institute of Technology"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["Thesis"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Doctoral","Doctor of Philosophy"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["In Copyright - Educational Use Permitted","Copyright MIT"]},{"key":"dc:rights.uri","label":"Rights URI","values":["http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC-EDU/1.0/"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier.uri","label":"Identifier URI","values":["https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/143336"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["The proton charge radius is a fundamental property of the proton, sensitive to its charge distribution. The proton radius puzzle is the discrepancy between the muonic hydrogen spectroscopy measurement of 0.84 fm and the consensus of 0.88 fm from two traditional methods, electron-proton scattering and electronic hydrogen spectroscopy. A recent electron-proton scattering experiment, PRad, measured a smaller radius but also large electric form factor values within 0.02 ≤ Q² ≤ 0.06 (GeV/c)² conflicting with previous experiments. Motivated by those issues, we developed an innovative background-free target system, including a windowless gas jet target, a beam halo collimator and an active beam halo veto, to measure the proton electric form factor at momentum transfers of 0.01 ≤ Q² ≤ 0.065 (GeV/c)². The experiment was conducted in early 2020 at the three-spectrometer facility of the A1-collaboration at the Mainz Microtron in Mainz, Germany. Due to the COVID-19 lockdown, we measured the cross section only up to Q² = 0.043 (GeV/c)² with limited statistics. Although our form factor data cannot give a definitive answer to the form factor discrepancy and the proton radius puzzle yet, our work demonstrated the feasibility of such a background-free target design and we believe that further data taking with this technique can help to resolve the radius puzzle. In this work, we also study the extraction of the proton charge radius using non-parametric models. We demonstrate that the kernel ridge regression and the Gaussian process have similar levels of performance compared to the traditional function fitting approaches. Our extracted values from different data sets still show the discrepancy of the proton charge radius, supporting the point of view that the discrepancy originates from the data itself instead of the extraction method."]},{"key":"dc:description.degree","label":"Dc Description Degree","values":["Ph.D."]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["New techniques in low-Q² elastic electron-proton scattering measurements and the proton radius extraction"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor.advisor":["Milner, Richard G."],"dc:contributor.department":["Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Physics"],"dc:creator":["Wang, Yimin"],"dc:date.accessioned":["2022-06-15T13:13:22Z"],"dc:date.available":["2022-06-15T13:13:22Z"],"dc:date.issued":["2022-02"],"dc:description.abstract":["The proton charge radius is a fundamental property of the proton, sensitive to its charge distribution. The proton radius puzzle is the discrepancy between the muonic hydrogen spectroscopy measurement of 0.84 fm and the consensus of 0.88 fm from two traditional methods, electron-proton scattering and electronic hydrogen spectroscopy. A recent electron-proton scattering experiment, PRad, measured a smaller radius but also large electric form factor values within 0.02 ≤ Q² ≤ 0.06 (GeV/c)² conflicting with previous experiments. Motivated by those issues, we developed an innovative background-free target system, including a windowless gas jet target, a beam halo collimator and an active beam halo veto, to measure the proton electric form factor at momentum transfers of 0.01 ≤ Q² ≤ 0.065 (GeV/c)². The experiment was conducted in early 2020 at the three-spectrometer facility of the A1-collaboration at the Mainz Microtron in Mainz, Germany. Due to the COVID-19 lockdown, we measured the cross section only up to Q² = 0.043 (GeV/c)² with limited statistics. Although our form factor data cannot give a definitive answer to the form factor discrepancy and the proton radius puzzle yet, our work demonstrated the feasibility of such a background-free target design and we believe that further data taking with this technique can help to resolve the radius puzzle. In this work, we also study the extraction of the proton charge radius using non-parametric models. We demonstrate that the kernel ridge regression and the Gaussian process have similar levels of performance compared to the traditional function fitting approaches. Our extracted values from different data sets still show the discrepancy of the proton charge radius, supporting the point of view that the discrepancy originates from the data itself instead of the extraction method."],"dc:description.degree":["Ph.D."],"dc:identifier.uri":["https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/143336"],"dc:publisher":["Massachusetts Institute of Technology"],"dc:rights":["In Copyright - Educational Use Permitted","Copyright MIT"],"dc:rights.uri":["http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dc:title":["New techniques in low-Q² elastic electron-proton scattering measurements and the proton radius extraction"],"dc:type":["Thesis"],"thesis:degree_name":["Doctoral","Doctor of Philosophy"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:22:19Z"}