Back to results

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Intermediaries of the state : bureaucratic transaction costs of claiming welfare in Mexico

Abstract

dc:description.abstract

This dissertation argues that the existence of bureaucratic transaction costs hinders individuals' pursuit of welfare benefits Instead, these costs make individuals dependent on intermediaries of the state who facilitate access to benefits Intermediaries range from street-level bureaucrats or social workers to political bosses, brokers or caciques However, in institutionally weak contexts, intermediaries will often demand political loyalty in return for their assistance, a practice better known as clientelism If chentelist intermediaries mediate citizens' engagement with the state, then claiming welfare benefits does not enhance citizenship and produce stakeholders, as research on the welfare state in developed country contexts suggests, but rather intensifies political loyalties to intermediaries This democratic penalty, although most prevalent in economically developing countries, is not exclusive to the poor Mediated interactions with the state perpetuate pre-existing skill deficits, with adverse consequences for individuals' sense of self-efficacy, political autonomy, and capacity to hold governments accountable Alongside more than 100 in-depth interviews with citizens, intermediaries, politicians, and bureaucrats, obtained during 13 months of fieldwork, I test this argument through a large-scale field experiment in rural Mexico The experimental results reveal that reducing the bureaucratic transaction costs increases the number of claims made through non-chentelist avenues The experimental intervention also weakened the belief that welfare entitlements must be reciprocated with political support and diminished general approval of quid pro quo exchanges, two key norms that sustain clientelism. Although intermediaries may be efficient deliverers of benefits and may even compensate for deficiencies in state capacity, this dissertation maintains that mediated avenues of distribution can have detrimental effects on building citizens' bureaucratic skills, autonomous political participation, and the ability to reliably make policy demands on the state However, my results demonstrate that the vicious cycle of mediation can be broken by reducing the costs that citizens face in obtaining welfare benefits directly from the state.

Degree

thesis:*
Name thesis:degree_name
Doctoral
Department dc:contributor.department
Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Political Science
Grantor dc:publisher
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Year dc:date.issued
2020

Author and committee

dc:creator, dc:contributor.*
Author dc:creator
  • Rizzo, Tesalia (Tesalia Elisa Rizzo Reyes)
Advisor dc:contributor.advisor
  • Lily L Tsai.

Subjects

dc:subject × 1

Rights

dc:rights
Statement dc:rights
  • MIT theses may be protected by copyright. Please reuse MIT thesis content according to the MIT Libraries Permissions Policy, which is available through the URL provided.
Language dc:language.iso
eng

Identifiers

dc:identifier.*
Handle dc:identifier.uri
https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/139725
OAI identifier oai:identifier
oai:dspace.mit.edu:1721.1/139725

Chain of custody

source
Harvested from
MIT
Base URL
dspace.mit.edu/oai/request
Last updated
2026-07-22
Source record
OAI-PMH GetRecord
related terms
citation

Rizzo, Tesalia (Tesalia Elisa Rizzo Reyes). Intermediaries of the state : bureaucratic transaction costs of claiming welfare in Mexico. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2020. https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/139725