Back to results

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

An Environmental Cost Basis for Regulating Aviation NOx Emissions/

Abstract

dc:description.abstract

Nitrogen oxides and carbon dioxide are two by-products of combustion in aircraft engines, and have different impacts on the environment. Nitrogen oxides (NO[subscript x]) are both an air quality concern and an indirect contributor to radiative forcing, while carbon dioxide (CO₂) is a long-lived greenhouse gas The International Civil Aviation Organization has been responsible for evaluating and setting commercial aircraft NO[subscript x] emissions standards since 1981 Each of the historical standards has been more stringent than the previous and, when implemented, requires newly certified engines to produce less NO[subscript x] per unit rated thrust Each iteration has been defined as a function of engine overall pressure ratio, which then links the engine cycle, and implicitly fuel burn and CO₂ emissions, to allowable NO[subscript x] levels These regulations have historically been evaluated and implemented with a focus on reducing adverse air quality impacts around airports, but the thermodynamic tradeoff with CO₂ requires additional analysis to quantify net climate impacts This paper introduces a social cost basis for evaluating aviation NO[subscript x] emissions regulations, and quantifies air quality damage, climate damage, and fuel costs associated with allowable emission levels. The result is monetized environmental and fuel costs associated with certain emission standards. Results show higher overall pressure ratio engines operating at the current NO[subscript x] regulatory limit are allowed more environmental damage per unit rated thrust than lower overall pressure ratio engines, therefore allowing uneven social costs per unit thrust (i e fuel and environmental costs combined) across the engine design space This is a consequence of the definition of the regulation today, where higher pressure ratio engines are allowed higher NO[subscript x] emissions Alternative regulation definitions are evaluated which consider the engine cycle and combustor together. Achieving constant social costs requires the regulation to decrease in slope at higher pressure ratios, corresponding to the diminishing marginal efficiency improvements, instead of increasing slope in that region.

Degree

thesis:*
Department dc:contributor.department
Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics
Grantor dc:publisher
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Year dc:date.issued
2019

Author and committee

dc:creator, dc:contributor.*
Author dc:creator
  • Miller, Cassandra Joy.
Advisor dc:contributor.advisor
  • Steven R H Barrett.

Subjects

dc:subject × 1

Rights

dc:rights
Statement dc:rights
  • MIT theses may be protected by copyright. Please reuse MIT thesis content according to the MIT Libraries Permissions Policy, which is available through the URL provided.
Language dc:language.iso
eng

Identifiers

dc:identifier.*
Handle dc:identifier.uri
https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/139710
OAI identifier oai:identifier
oai:dspace.mit.edu:1721.1/139710

Chain of custody

source
Harvested from
MIT
Base URL
dspace.mit.edu/oai/request
Last updated
2026-07-22
Source record
OAI-PMH GetRecord
citation

Miller, Cassandra Joy.. An Environmental Cost Basis for Regulating Aviation NOx Emissions/. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2019. https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/139710