Taking an occupational lens to worker voice and preference for labor representation

Union density declined as the U.S. economy shifted away from production and membership rates stagnated or declined in the growing service or knowledge sector occupations. Recent collective actions among these occupations including union organizing, protests, and petitions suggest a potential infection point for unions and the labor movement. Yet, there are reasons to doubt whether existing labor forms and labor law can accommodate the interests of workers in these occupations with little experience in unions and collective bargaining. I use data from two nationally representative surveys to explore how preferences about voice and labor representation vary between occupation groups. I supplement this with a survey of professional and technical employees to gauge general and specific attitudes towards unions. My results show that some features of the U.S. labor union are widely desired, like collective bargaining, but alternative forms of labor organization that expand selective benefits, (cooperative) input to management, and make membership more flexible can substantially increase interest among the growing occupations in different ways. I discuss the implications for labor law reform and labor organizations' strategies.

Department dc:contributor.department

Sloan School of Management

Grantor dc:publisher

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Year dc:date.issued

2020

Author dc:creator

• Kimball, William(William T.)

Advisor dc:contributor.advisor

• Thomas Kochan.

• Sloan School of Management.

Statement dc:rights

• MIT theses may be protected by copyright. Please reuse MIT thesis content according to the MIT Libraries Permissions Policy, which is available through the URL provided.

Licence dc:rights.uri

• http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582

Language dc:language.iso

eng

Handle dc:identifier.uri

https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/129087

OAI identifier oai:identifier

oai:dspace.mit.edu:1721.1/129087