Cross-subsidy models for urban manufacturing

Much has been written concerning the positive socio-economic values of urban manufacturing and the need for cities to advocate for the protection of existing middle-income wage jobs in the industrial sector. However, there lie governing factors as to why a use, that has always been essential to communities, has become very hard to grow or even sustain in the present time. Urban growth models were usually developed around the idea that industrial uses are a negative externality. Unlike numerous cities that witnessed complete deindustrialization after World War II, New York City has over the years transformed the identity of its Manufacturing districts. The revival of urban manufacturing in the heart of NYC, where the highest and best use is not in favor of industrial use, has pushed for re-visiting the outdated industrial zoning framework for the first time since the 1961 zoning resolution.

Name thesis:degree_name

Master

Department dc:contributor.department

Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Center for Real Estate

Grantor dc:publisher

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Year dc:date.issued

2020

Author dc:creator

• Abdelgawad, Salma.

Advisor dc:contributor.advisor

• Kairos Shen.

• Center for Real Estate. Program in Real Estate Development.

Statement dc:rights

• MIT theses may be protected by copyright. Please reuse MIT thesis content according to the MIT Libraries Permissions Policy, which is available through the URL provided.

Licence dc:rights.uri

• http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582

Language dc:language.iso

eng

Handle dc:identifier.uri

https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/127859

OAI identifier oai:identifier

oai:dspace.mit.edu:1721.1/127859