{"id":{"repo_id":"mit","oai_identifier":"oai:dspace.mit.edu:1721.1/122338"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/mit/oai:dspace.mit.edu:1721.1/122338","repository":{"repo_id":"mit","name":"MIT","base_url":"https://dspace.mit.edu/oai/request"},"display":{"title":"Conflicting goals in product development : learning from the fatal Firestone flaw","abstract":"The human-centered design approach is a powerful methodology for developing products that are considerate of humanity. Yet, in spite of the proven success of empathetic design, we still see products that fail, amplify negative social behaviors, or take advantage of human tendencies for the sake of profit or competitive success. These outcomes are often the result of poor negotiation between conflicting organizational and value-driven goals. The purpose of this analysis is to consider how goal conflict inhibits the product development process and leads to suboptimal or destructive results. This exploration seeks to learn from an analysis of the deadly product failure of Firestone ATX, ATX 11, and Wilderness AT tires in the late 1990s. Drawing from Congressional testimony, expert evaluation, and depositions of relevant engineers, this analysis considers the impact of goal conflict on product design requirements and testing. Recommendations include methods for identifying goals and framing conflict to encourage balance between organizational goals and human wellbeing. This project is the beginning of a larger body of work that aims to equip \"makers\" with skills they need to reconcile conflicting goals in order to focus on making the world better by making better things.","abstract_html":"The human-centered design approach is a powerful methodology for developing products that are considerate of humanity. Yet, in spite of the proven success of empathetic design, we still see products that fail, amplify negative social behaviors, or take advantage of human tendencies for the sake of profit or competitive success. These outcomes are often the result of poor negotiation between conflicting organizational and value-driven goals. The purpose of this analysis is to consider how goal conflict inhibits the product development process and leads to suboptimal or destructive results. This exploration seeks to learn from an analysis of the deadly product failure of Firestone ATX, ATX 11, and Wilderness AT tires in the late 1990s. Drawing from Congressional testimony, expert evaluation, and depositions of relevant engineers, this analysis considers the impact of goal conflict on product design requirements and testing. Recommendations include methods for identifying goals and framing conflict to encourage balance between organizational goals and human wellbeing. This project is the beginning of a larger body of work that aims to equip "makers" with skills they need to reconcile conflicting goals in order to focus on making the world better by making better things.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Moore, Rachel M.(Rachel Meredith)"],"institution":"Massachusetts Institute of Technology","degree_name":"Master","degree_level":null,"degree_discipline":null,"degree_department":"Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Engineering and Management Program","school":null,"contributors":[],"advisors":["David Niño."],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2019,"date_issued":"2019","date_published":"2019","updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:21:47Z","subjects":["Engineering and Management Program.","System Design and Management Program."],"languages":["eng"],"rights":["MIT theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed, downloaded, or printed from this source but further reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission."],"rights_urls":["http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582"],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/122338","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier.uri"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor.advisor","label":"Advisor","values":["David Niño."]},{"key":"dc:contributor.department","label":"Department","values":["Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Engineering and Management Program","SysDes","System Design and Management Program"]},{"key":"dc:contributor.other","label":"Dc Contributor Other","values":["Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Engineering and Management Program.","System Design and Management Program."]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Moore, Rachel M.(Rachel Meredith)"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date.accessioned","label":"Dc Date Accessioned","values":["2019-09-26T21:00:26Z"]},{"key":"dc:date.available","label":"Dc Date Available","values":["2019-09-26T21:00:26Z"]},{"key":"dc:date.issued","label":"Date","values":["2019"]},{"key":"dc:publisher","label":"Institution","values":["Massachusetts Institute of Technology"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["Thesis"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Master"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Engineering and Management Program.","System Design and Management Program."]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language.iso","label":"Language (ISO)","values":["eng"]},{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["MIT theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed, downloaded, or printed from this source but further reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission."]},{"key":"dc:rights.uri","label":"Rights URI","values":["http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier.uri","label":"Identifier URI","values":["https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/122338"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description","label":"Description","values":["Thesis: S.M. in Engineering and Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, System Design and Management Program, 2019","Cataloged from PDF version of thesis.","Includes bibliographical references (pages 119-121)."]},{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["The human-centered design approach is a powerful methodology for developing products that are considerate of humanity. Yet, in spite of the proven success of empathetic design, we still see products that fail, amplify negative social behaviors, or take advantage of human tendencies for the sake of profit or competitive success. These outcomes are often the result of poor negotiation between conflicting organizational and value-driven goals. The purpose of this analysis is to consider how goal conflict inhibits the product development process and leads to suboptimal or destructive results. This exploration seeks to learn from an analysis of the deadly product failure of Firestone ATX, ATX 11, and Wilderness AT tires in the late 1990s. Drawing from Congressional testimony, expert evaluation, and depositions of relevant engineers, this analysis considers the impact of goal conflict on product design requirements and testing. Recommendations include methods for identifying goals and framing conflict to encourage balance between organizational goals and human wellbeing. This project is the beginning of a larger body of work that aims to equip \"makers\" with skills they need to reconcile conflicting goals in order to focus on making the world better by making better things."]},{"key":"dc:description.degree","label":"Dc Description Degree","values":["S.M. in Engineering and Management"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Conflicting goals in product development : learning from the fatal Firestone flaw"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor.advisor":["David Niño."],"dc:contributor.department":["Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Engineering and Management Program","SysDes","System Design and Management Program"],"dc:contributor.other":["Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Engineering and Management Program.","System Design and Management Program."],"dc:creator":["Moore, Rachel M.(Rachel Meredith)"],"dc:date.accessioned":["2019-09-26T21:00:26Z"],"dc:date.available":["2019-09-26T21:00:26Z"],"dc:date.issued":["2019"],"dc:description":["Thesis: S.M. in Engineering and Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, System Design and Management Program, 2019","Cataloged from PDF version of thesis.","Includes bibliographical references (pages 119-121)."],"dc:description.abstract":["The human-centered design approach is a powerful methodology for developing products that are considerate of humanity. Yet, in spite of the proven success of empathetic design, we still see products that fail, amplify negative social behaviors, or take advantage of human tendencies for the sake of profit or competitive success. These outcomes are often the result of poor negotiation between conflicting organizational and value-driven goals. The purpose of this analysis is to consider how goal conflict inhibits the product development process and leads to suboptimal or destructive results. This exploration seeks to learn from an analysis of the deadly product failure of Firestone ATX, ATX 11, and Wilderness AT tires in the late 1990s. Drawing from Congressional testimony, expert evaluation, and depositions of relevant engineers, this analysis considers the impact of goal conflict on product design requirements and testing. Recommendations include methods for identifying goals and framing conflict to encourage balance between organizational goals and human wellbeing. This project is the beginning of a larger body of work that aims to equip \"makers\" with skills they need to reconcile conflicting goals in order to focus on making the world better by making better things."],"dc:description.degree":["S.M. in Engineering and Management"],"dc:identifier.uri":["https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/122338"],"dc:language.iso":["eng"],"dc:publisher":["Massachusetts Institute of Technology"],"dc:rights":["MIT theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed, downloaded, or printed from this source but further reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission."],"dc:rights.uri":["http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582"],"dc:subject":["Engineering and Management Program.","System Design and Management Program."],"dc:title":["Conflicting goals in product development : learning from the fatal Firestone flaw"],"dc:type":["Thesis"],"thesis:degree_name":["Master"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:21:47Z"}