{"id":{"repo_id":"mit","oai_identifier":"oai:dspace.mit.edu:1721.1/122251"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/mit/oai:dspace.mit.edu:1721.1/122251","repository":{"repo_id":"mit","name":"MIT","base_url":"https://dspace.mit.edu/oai/request"},"display":{"title":"Analysis of merger & acquisition frameworks from a deal rationale perspective in technology sector","abstract":"Mergers and Acquisitions (M&A) activity has been a widely researched area over the past century by both academic and industry experts. This paper summarizes the various frameworks that have been developed to explain the motivations to conduct M&A. While the frameworks themselves have been developed based on surveys of past success and failures, they are heavily relied upon by various M&A schools of thought to advise present and future strategies for the industry. In comparing these frameworks, the paper summarizes how deal rationales drive success or failure of M&A transactions. I analyze the HP-Autonomy case study to demonstrate how the different frameworks would approach the deal in question. I also look at the failure modes demonstrated in the deal to better evaluate relevance of the frameworks to the intended deal rationale. Further I talk about how innovation fuels inorganic growth for companies in the technology domain. In doing so, I focus on the relevance of these frameworks to the technology domain and how the industry should approach and utilize these M&A frameworks. Based on the studies and the key concerns of the technology domain, I conclude on the possibility of McKinsey Framework being a truly comprehensive Framework that can be used as a basis for understanding the motivation for a M&A transaction. In summary, this paper will provide an overview of the M&A frameworks developed over past 6 merger waves, compare them within the scope of technology domain and evangelize on their applicability and relevance.","abstract_html":"Mergers and Acquisitions (M&A) activity has been a widely researched area over the past century by both academic and industry experts. This paper summarizes the various frameworks that have been developed to explain the motivations to conduct M&A. While the frameworks themselves have been developed based on surveys of past success and failures, they are heavily relied upon by various M&A schools of thought to advise present and future strategies for the industry. In comparing these frameworks, the paper summarizes how deal rationales drive success or failure of M&A transactions. I analyze the HP-Autonomy case study to demonstrate how the different frameworks would approach the deal in question. I also look at the failure modes demonstrated in the deal to better evaluate relevance of the frameworks to the intended deal rationale. Further I talk about how innovation fuels inorganic growth for companies in the technology domain. In doing so, I focus on the relevance of these frameworks to the technology domain and how the industry should approach and utilize these M&A frameworks. Based on the studies and the key concerns of the technology domain, I conclude on the possibility of McKinsey Framework being a truly comprehensive Framework that can be used as a basis for understanding the motivation for a M&A transaction. In summary, this paper will provide an overview of the M&A frameworks developed over past 6 merger waves, compare them within the scope of technology domain and evangelize on their applicability and relevance.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Narayanan, Sridhar,S.M.Massachusetts Institute of Technology."],"institution":"Massachusetts Institute of Technology","degree_name":"Master","degree_level":null,"degree_discipline":null,"degree_department":"Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Engineering and Management Program","school":null,"contributors":[],"advisors":["Bruce G. Cameron."],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2019,"date_issued":"2019","date_published":"2019","updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:20:52Z","subjects":["Engineering and Management Program.","System Design and Management Program."],"languages":["eng"],"rights":["MIT theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed, downloaded, or printed from this source but further reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission."],"rights_urls":["http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582"],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/122251","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier.uri"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor.advisor","label":"Advisor","values":["Bruce G. Cameron."]},{"key":"dc:contributor.department","label":"Department","values":["Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Engineering and Management Program","SysDes"]},{"key":"dc:contributor.other","label":"Dc Contributor Other","values":["Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Engineering and Management Program.","System Design and Management Program."]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Narayanan, Sridhar,S.M.Massachusetts Institute of Technology."]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date.accessioned","label":"Dc Date Accessioned","values":["2019-09-17T19:50:40Z"]},{"key":"dc:date.available","label":"Dc Date Available","values":["2019-09-17T19:50:40Z"]},{"key":"dc:date.issued","label":"Date","values":["2019"]},{"key":"dc:publisher","label":"Institution","values":["Massachusetts Institute of Technology"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["Thesis"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Master"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Engineering and Management Program.","System Design and Management Program."]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language.iso","label":"Language (ISO)","values":["eng"]},{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["MIT theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed, downloaded, or printed from this source but further reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission."]},{"key":"dc:rights.uri","label":"Rights URI","values":["http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier.uri","label":"Identifier URI","values":["https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/122251"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description","label":"Description","values":["Thesis: S.M. in Engineering and Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, System Design and Management Program, 2019","Cataloged from PDF version of thesis.","Includes bibliographical references."]},{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["Mergers and Acquisitions (M&A) activity has been a widely researched area over the past century by both academic and industry experts. This paper summarizes the various frameworks that have been developed to explain the motivations to conduct M&A. While the frameworks themselves have been developed based on surveys of past success and failures, they are heavily relied upon by various M&A schools of thought to advise present and future strategies for the industry. In comparing these frameworks, the paper summarizes how deal rationales drive success or failure of M&A transactions. I analyze the HP-Autonomy case study to demonstrate how the different frameworks would approach the deal in question. I also look at the failure modes demonstrated in the deal to better evaluate relevance of the frameworks to the intended deal rationale. Further I talk about how innovation fuels inorganic growth for companies in the technology domain. In doing so, I focus on the relevance of these frameworks to the technology domain and how the industry should approach and utilize these M&A frameworks. Based on the studies and the key concerns of the technology domain, I conclude on the possibility of McKinsey Framework being a truly comprehensive Framework that can be used as a basis for understanding the motivation for a M&A transaction. In summary, this paper will provide an overview of the M&A frameworks developed over past 6 merger waves, compare them within the scope of technology domain and evangelize on their applicability and relevance."]},{"key":"dc:description.degree","label":"Dc Description Degree","values":["S.M. in Engineering and Management"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Analysis of merger & acquisition frameworks from a deal rationale perspective in technology sector"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor.advisor":["Bruce G. Cameron."],"dc:contributor.department":["Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Engineering and Management Program","SysDes"],"dc:contributor.other":["Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Engineering and Management Program.","System Design and Management Program."],"dc:creator":["Narayanan, Sridhar,S.M.Massachusetts Institute of Technology."],"dc:date.accessioned":["2019-09-17T19:50:40Z"],"dc:date.available":["2019-09-17T19:50:40Z"],"dc:date.issued":["2019"],"dc:description":["Thesis: S.M. in Engineering and Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, System Design and Management Program, 2019","Cataloged from PDF version of thesis.","Includes bibliographical references."],"dc:description.abstract":["Mergers and Acquisitions (M&A) activity has been a widely researched area over the past century by both academic and industry experts. This paper summarizes the various frameworks that have been developed to explain the motivations to conduct M&A. While the frameworks themselves have been developed based on surveys of past success and failures, they are heavily relied upon by various M&A schools of thought to advise present and future strategies for the industry. In comparing these frameworks, the paper summarizes how deal rationales drive success or failure of M&A transactions. I analyze the HP-Autonomy case study to demonstrate how the different frameworks would approach the deal in question. I also look at the failure modes demonstrated in the deal to better evaluate relevance of the frameworks to the intended deal rationale. Further I talk about how innovation fuels inorganic growth for companies in the technology domain. In doing so, I focus on the relevance of these frameworks to the technology domain and how the industry should approach and utilize these M&A frameworks. Based on the studies and the key concerns of the technology domain, I conclude on the possibility of McKinsey Framework being a truly comprehensive Framework that can be used as a basis for understanding the motivation for a M&A transaction. In summary, this paper will provide an overview of the M&A frameworks developed over past 6 merger waves, compare them within the scope of technology domain and evangelize on their applicability and relevance."],"dc:description.degree":["S.M. in Engineering and Management"],"dc:identifier.uri":["https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/122251"],"dc:language.iso":["eng"],"dc:publisher":["Massachusetts Institute of Technology"],"dc:rights":["MIT theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed, downloaded, or printed from this source but further reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission."],"dc:rights.uri":["http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582"],"dc:subject":["Engineering and Management Program.","System Design and Management Program."],"dc:title":["Analysis of merger & acquisition frameworks from a deal rationale perspective in technology sector"],"dc:type":["Thesis"],"thesis:degree_name":["Master"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:20:52Z"}