Loss mechanisms in a highly loaded transonic axial turbine stage

Flow in a one-and-a-half stage highly loaded transonic axial turbine representative of future generation turbine technology is assessed for its role in loss generation. Steady and unsteady two-dimensional and three-dimensional flow computations, complemented by simplistic control volume analyses as well as test data, provided results for establishing the quantitative level of loss from various sources. The test data has been acquired in a cascade and blowdown turbine research rig. Specifically, the overall loss determined from unsteady three-dimensional flow computations of a cooled one-and-a-half stage turbine is within 6% of that inferred from the blowdown turbine rig test data. The computed flows with different levels of flow and configuration complexities are post-processed and interrogated to allow an estimation of blade profile loss, trailing edge loss, shock loss, endwall loss, secondary flow loss, tip leakage loss, cooling injection loss, and unsteady flow loss. The dominant sources of loss are determined to be the trailing edge loss, profile loss, and tip leakage loss. The computed flows show that the flow deviation in a highly loaded transonic turbine airfoil with trailing edge shocks is negative (-2° to -4°); estimating the trailing edge loss by assuming zero flow deviation in a simple control volume approach would yield a significantly higher value. Loss arising from flow unsteadiness contributes an additional loss of about 1/6 of that in steady flow approximation; 3/4 of the flow unsteadiness induced loss occurs in the downstream vane where the flow is threaded with propagating shocks from the upstream blade and downstream shock reflections; and the remaining 1/4 is from unsteadiness in NGV wakes and shock oscillations from influence of the adjacent airfoil row. 1/5 of the overall loss in the one-and-a-half stage turbine is from the cooling and purge flows. A preliminary assessment of loss variation with turbine stage pressure ratio shows a non-monotonic trend.

Department dc:contributor.department

Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics.

Grantor dc:publisher

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Year dc:date.issued

2018

Author dc:creator

• Shannon, Kevin R. (Kevin Robert)

Advisor dc:contributor.advisor

• Choon S. Tan, John P. Clark and Scott M. Carson.

• Aeronautics and Astronautics.

Statement dc:rights

• MIT theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed, downloaded, or printed from this source but further reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission.

Licence dc:rights.uri

• http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582

Language dc:language.iso

eng

Handle dc:identifier.uri

http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/120440

OAI identifier oai:identifier

oai:dspace.mit.edu:1721.1/120440