{"id":{"repo_id":"mit","oai_identifier":"oai:dspace.mit.edu:1721.1/103209"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/mit/oai:dspace.mit.edu:1721.1/103209","repository":{"repo_id":"mit","name":"MIT","base_url":"https://dspace.mit.edu/oai/request"},"display":{"title":"Risk management unveiling and taming danger : exploratory search embedded in legitimating routines","abstract":"This paper explores how contemporary organizations manage inherent tensions between productivity and legitimacy in the context of the \"risk society.\" Interviews with executives in large organizations across a range of industries reveal that many risk managers echo this tension within their own work as they juxtapose two seemingly contradictory modes of search and action across five dimensions of risk management (identification, assessment, action, reassessment, and monitoring/reporting). On the one hand, they employ the routine procedures, measurement, tracking and reporting of audit processes designed to uphold legitimacy. On the other hand, though, they also use a radically different approach for risk identification, which they view as the substance of their work. Aware of risk's indeterminate nature, they adopt unscripted processes of exploration that question and undermine the taken-for-granted nature of measurement and routine, employing a collection of techniques I label \"creative challenge.\"","abstract_html":"This paper explores how contemporary organizations manage inherent tensions between productivity and legitimacy in the context of the &quot;risk society.&quot; Interviews with executives in large organizations across a range of industries reveal that many risk managers echo this tension within their own work as they juxtapose two seemingly contradictory modes of search and action across five dimensions of risk management (identification, assessment, action, reassessment, and monitoring/reporting). On the one hand, they employ the routine procedures, measurement, tracking and reporting of audit processes designed to uphold legitimacy. On the other hand, though, they also use a radically different approach for risk identification, which they view as the substance of their work. Aware of risk&#x27;s indeterminate nature, they adopt unscripted processes of exploration that question and undermine the taken-for-granted nature of measurement and routine, employing a collection of techniques I label &quot;creative challenge.&quot;","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Grassin-Drake, Laurel Edwards"],"institution":"Massachusetts Institute of Technology","degree_name":null,"degree_level":null,"degree_discipline":null,"degree_department":"Sloan School of Management.","school":null,"contributors":[],"advisors":["Ezra Zuckerman Sivan."],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2016,"date_issued":"2016","date_published":"2016","updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:22:24Z","subjects":["Sloan School of Management."],"languages":["eng"],"rights":["M.I.T. theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission."],"rights_urls":["http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582"],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/103209","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier.uri"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor.advisor","label":"Advisor","values":["Ezra Zuckerman Sivan."]},{"key":"dc:contributor.department","label":"Department","values":["Sloan School of Management."]},{"key":"dc:contributor.other","label":"Dc Contributor Other","values":["Sloan School of Management."]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Grassin-Drake, Laurel Edwards"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date.accessioned","label":"Dc Date Accessioned","values":["2016-06-22T17:47:28Z"]},{"key":"dc:date.available","label":"Dc Date Available","values":["2016-06-22T17:47:28Z"]},{"key":"dc:date.issued","label":"Date","values":["2016"]},{"key":"dc:publisher","label":"Institution","values":["Massachusetts Institute of Technology"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["Thesis"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Sloan School of Management."]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language.iso","label":"Language (ISO)","values":["eng"]},{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["M.I.T. theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission."]},{"key":"dc:rights.uri","label":"Rights URI","values":["http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier.uri","label":"Identifier URI","values":["http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/103209"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description","label":"Description","values":["Thesis: S.M. in Management Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Sloan School of Management, 2016.","Cataloged from PDF version of thesis.","Includes bibliographical references (pages 49-56)."]},{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["This paper explores how contemporary organizations manage inherent tensions between productivity and legitimacy in the context of the \"risk society.\" Interviews with executives in large organizations across a range of industries reveal that many risk managers echo this tension within their own work as they juxtapose two seemingly contradictory modes of search and action across five dimensions of risk management (identification, assessment, action, reassessment, and monitoring/reporting). On the one hand, they employ the routine procedures, measurement, tracking and reporting of audit processes designed to uphold legitimacy. On the other hand, though, they also use a radically different approach for risk identification, which they view as the substance of their work. Aware of risk's indeterminate nature, they adopt unscripted processes of exploration that question and undermine the taken-for-granted nature of measurement and routine, employing a collection of techniques I label \"creative challenge.\""]},{"key":"dc:description.degree","label":"Dc Description Degree","values":["S.M. in Management Research"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Risk management unveiling and taming danger : exploratory search embedded in legitimating routines"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor.advisor":["Ezra Zuckerman Sivan."],"dc:contributor.department":["Sloan School of Management."],"dc:contributor.other":["Sloan School of Management."],"dc:creator":["Grassin-Drake, Laurel Edwards"],"dc:date.accessioned":["2016-06-22T17:47:28Z"],"dc:date.available":["2016-06-22T17:47:28Z"],"dc:date.issued":["2016"],"dc:description":["Thesis: S.M. in Management Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Sloan School of Management, 2016.","Cataloged from PDF version of thesis.","Includes bibliographical references (pages 49-56)."],"dc:description.abstract":["This paper explores how contemporary organizations manage inherent tensions between productivity and legitimacy in the context of the \"risk society.\" Interviews with executives in large organizations across a range of industries reveal that many risk managers echo this tension within their own work as they juxtapose two seemingly contradictory modes of search and action across five dimensions of risk management (identification, assessment, action, reassessment, and monitoring/reporting). On the one hand, they employ the routine procedures, measurement, tracking and reporting of audit processes designed to uphold legitimacy. On the other hand, though, they also use a radically different approach for risk identification, which they view as the substance of their work. Aware of risk's indeterminate nature, they adopt unscripted processes of exploration that question and undermine the taken-for-granted nature of measurement and routine, employing a collection of techniques I label \"creative challenge.\""],"dc:description.degree":["S.M. in Management Research"],"dc:identifier.uri":["http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/103209"],"dc:language.iso":["eng"],"dc:publisher":["Massachusetts Institute of Technology"],"dc:rights":["M.I.T. theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission."],"dc:rights.uri":["http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582"],"dc:subject":["Sloan School of Management."],"dc:title":["Risk management unveiling and taming danger : exploratory search embedded in legitimating routines"],"dc:type":["Thesis"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:22:24Z"}