{"id":{"repo_id":"missouri","oai_identifier":"oai:mospace.umsystem.edu:10355/43091"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/missouri/oai:mospace.umsystem.edu:10355/43091","repository":{"repo_id":"missouri","name":"University of Missouri","base_url":"https://mospace.umsystem.edu/oai/request"},"display":{"title":"The price of success : unified government and midterm elections","abstract":"[ACCESS RESTRICTED TO THE UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI-COLUMBIA AT AUTHOR'S REQUEST.] A commonly observed fact about midterm elections is that the president's party almost always loses seats in the House of Representatives. Several frameworks have been proposed to explain why this occurs. While these frameworks consider the impact of the president's party, they do not consider how the relationship between the president and Congress affects midterm elections. In my study, I fill this void. I focus on the effect unified government has on midterm elections. Rather than propose a new framework, I use unified government to show strengths and weaknesses in previous frameworks. My study shows certain frameworks are not valid and may need to be discarded. I also show how other frameworks are improved by considering the effect of unified government and how others may need to be reformulated based on the effect of unified government. I further test the validity of my theory be examining unified government's effect in state legislative elections. Besides showing that unified government should be considered when examining midterm elections, I also show how unified government changes midterm election outcomes.","abstract_html":"[ACCESS RESTRICTED TO THE UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI-COLUMBIA AT AUTHOR'S REQUEST.] A commonly observed fact about midterm elections is that the president's party almost always loses seats in the House of Representatives. Several frameworks have been proposed to explain why this occurs. While these frameworks consider the impact of the president's party, they do not consider how the relationship between the president and Congress affects midterm elections. In my study, I fill this void. I focus on the effect unified government has on midterm elections. Rather than propose a new framework, I use unified government to show strengths and weaknesses in previous frameworks. My study shows certain frameworks are not valid and may need to be discarded. I also show how other frameworks are improved by considering the effect of unified government and how others may need to be reformulated based on the effect of unified government. I further test the validity of my theory be examining unified government's effect in state legislative elections. Besides showing that unified government should be considered when examining midterm elections, I also show how unified government changes midterm election outcomes.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Holt, Jacob (Jacob Christopher)"],"institution":"University of Missouri--Columbia","degree_name":"Ph. D.","degree_level":"Doctoral","degree_discipline":"Political science (MU)","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":[],"advisors":["Overby, L. Marvin"],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2013,"date_issued":"2013","date_published":"2013","updated_at":"2026-07-24T03:07:46Z","subjects":[],"languages":["eng","English"],"rights":["Access to files is limited to the University of Missouri--Columbia with SSO login."],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier.uri","label":"Identifier URI","values":["https://doi.org/10.32469/10355/43091"],"render_values":[{"text":"https://doi.org/10.32469/10355/43091","href":"https://doi.org/10.32469/10355/43091","code":true}]}]},"links":{"outbound_url":"https://hdl.handle.net/10355/43091","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier.uri"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor.advisor","label":"Advisor","values":["Overby, L. Marvin"]},{"key":"dc:contributor.other","label":"Dc Contributor Other","values":["University of Missouri-Columbia. Graduate School. Theses and Dissertations. Dissertations. 2013 Dissertations"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Holt, Jacob (Jacob Christopher)"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date.accessioned","label":"Dc Date Accessioned","values":["2014-06-04T22:13:35Z"]},{"key":"dc:date.available","label":"Dc Date Available","values":["2014-06-04T22:13:35Z"]},{"key":"dc:date.issued","label":"Date","values":["2013"]},{"key":"dc:publisher","label":"Institution","values":["University of Missouri--Columbia"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["Thesis"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Political science (MU)"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Doctoral"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Ph. D."]},{"key":"thesis:institution_name","label":"Thesis Institution Name","values":["University of Missouri--Columbia"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language","label":"Dc Language","values":["English"]},{"key":"dc:language.iso","label":"Language (ISO)","values":["eng"]},{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["Access to files is limited to the University of Missouri--Columbia with SSO login."]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier.uri","label":"Identifier URI","values":["https://doi.org/10.32469/10355/43091","https://hdl.handle.net/10355/43091"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["[ACCESS RESTRICTED TO THE UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI-COLUMBIA AT AUTHOR'S REQUEST.] A commonly observed fact about midterm elections is that the president's party almost always loses seats in the House of Representatives. Several frameworks have been proposed to explain why this occurs. While these frameworks consider the impact of the president's party, they do not consider how the relationship between the president and Congress affects midterm elections. In my study, I fill this void. I focus on the effect unified government has on midterm elections. Rather than propose a new framework, I use unified government to show strengths and weaknesses in previous frameworks. My study shows certain frameworks are not valid and may need to be discarded. I also show how other frameworks are improved by considering the effect of unified government and how others may need to be reformulated based on the effect of unified government. I further test the validity of my theory be examining unified government's effect in state legislative elections. Besides showing that unified government should be considered when examining midterm elections, I also show how unified government changes midterm election outcomes."]},{"key":"dc:source","label":"Dc Source","values":["Submitted by the University of Missouri--Columbia Graduate School."]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["The price of success : unified government and midterm elections"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor.advisor":["Overby, L. Marvin"],"dc:contributor.other":["University of Missouri-Columbia. Graduate School. Theses and Dissertations. Dissertations. 2013 Dissertations"],"dc:creator":["Holt, Jacob (Jacob Christopher)"],"dc:date.accessioned":["2014-06-04T22:13:35Z"],"dc:date.available":["2014-06-04T22:13:35Z"],"dc:date.issued":["2013"],"dc:description.abstract":["[ACCESS RESTRICTED TO THE UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI-COLUMBIA AT AUTHOR'S REQUEST.] A commonly observed fact about midterm elections is that the president's party almost always loses seats in the House of Representatives. Several frameworks have been proposed to explain why this occurs. While these frameworks consider the impact of the president's party, they do not consider how the relationship between the president and Congress affects midterm elections. In my study, I fill this void. I focus on the effect unified government has on midterm elections. Rather than propose a new framework, I use unified government to show strengths and weaknesses in previous frameworks. My study shows certain frameworks are not valid and may need to be discarded. I also show how other frameworks are improved by considering the effect of unified government and how others may need to be reformulated based on the effect of unified government. I further test the validity of my theory be examining unified government's effect in state legislative elections. Besides showing that unified government should be considered when examining midterm elections, I also show how unified government changes midterm election outcomes."],"dc:identifier.uri":["https://doi.org/10.32469/10355/43091","https://hdl.handle.net/10355/43091"],"dc:language":["English"],"dc:language.iso":["eng"],"dc:publisher":["University of Missouri--Columbia"],"dc:rights":["Access to files is limited to the University of Missouri--Columbia with SSO login."],"dc:source":["Submitted by the University of Missouri--Columbia Graduate School."],"dc:title":["The price of success : unified government and midterm elections"],"dc:type":["Thesis"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Political science (MU)"],"thesis:degree_level":["Doctoral"],"thesis:degree_name":["Ph. D."],"thesis:institution_name":["University of Missouri--Columbia"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-24T03:07:46Z"}