{"id":{"repo_id":"missouri","oai_identifier":"oai:mospace.umsystem.edu:10355/37934"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/missouri/oai:mospace.umsystem.edu:10355/37934","repository":{"repo_id":"missouri","name":"University of Missouri","base_url":"https://mospace.umsystem.edu/oai/request"},"display":{"title":"An assessment of the impact of landscape soil, government programs and crop insurance on the profitability of perennial grass cropping systems grown for bioenergy","abstract":"Cellulosic biomass is among the most promising alternatives to fossil fuels being considered in Missouri. In order to become a viable energy source, there needs to be a reliable supply of cellulosic material. Miscanthus, switchgrass, or a native prairie mix are posed to meet that supply. This study analyzes the profitability of those three cropping systems when grown for bioenergy relative to corn and soybeans. It uses a stochastic budgeting model with actual grain yields, FAPRI baseline prices, and ALMANAC modeled grass yields to demonstrate how landscape soils, government programs like Biomass Crop Assistance Program (BCAP), and crop insurance affect the decision to plant bioenergy crops. The analysis assumes that the producers are risk averse and seek to maximize utility. Results show that perennial grasses grown for bioenergy have a higher relative profitability on flooded Belknap soils and Armstrong and Armster eroded upland soils versus Putnam soil which is non-eroded and upland, that government support increases profitability of these bioenergy crops but not enough for utility maximizing producers to choose them, and crop insurance decreases the likelihood of planting them by mitigating the risks associated with corn and soybeans.","abstract_html":"Cellulosic biomass is among the most promising alternatives to fossil fuels being considered in Missouri. In order to become a viable energy source, there needs to be a reliable supply of cellulosic material. Miscanthus, switchgrass, or a native prairie mix are posed to meet that supply. This study analyzes the profitability of those three cropping systems when grown for bioenergy relative to corn and soybeans. It uses a stochastic budgeting model with actual grain yields, FAPRI baseline prices, and ALMANAC modeled grass yields to demonstrate how landscape soils, government programs like Biomass Crop Assistance Program (BCAP), and crop insurance affect the decision to plant bioenergy crops. The analysis assumes that the producers are risk averse and seek to maximize utility. Results show that perennial grasses grown for bioenergy have a higher relative profitability on flooded Belknap soils and Armstrong and Armster eroded upland soils versus Putnam soil which is non-eroded and upland, that government support increases profitability of these bioenergy crops but not enough for utility maximizing producers to choose them, and crop insurance decreases the likelihood of planting them by mitigating the risks associated with corn and soybeans.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Dolginow, Joseph P."],"institution":"University of Missouri--Columbia","degree_name":"M.S.","degree_level":"Masters","degree_discipline":"Agricultural economics (MU)","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":[],"advisors":["Massey, Raymond E., 1957-"],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2013,"date_issued":"2013","date_published":"2013","updated_at":"2026-07-24T03:08:32Z","subjects":["bioenergy crops","Biomass Crop Assistance Program","cropping systems","profitability"],"languages":["eng","English"],"rights":[],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"http://hdl.handle.net/10355/37934","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier.uri"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor.advisor","label":"Advisor","values":["Massey, Raymond E., 1957-"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Dolginow, Joseph P."]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date.accessioned","label":"Dc Date Accessioned","values":["2013-09-09T13:53:08Z"]},{"key":"dc:date.available","label":"Dc Date Available","values":["2013-09-09T13:53:08Z"]},{"key":"dc:date.issued","label":"Date","values":["2013"]},{"key":"dc:publisher","label":"Institution","values":["University of Missouri--Columbia"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["Thesis"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Agricultural economics (MU)"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Masters"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["M.S."]},{"key":"thesis:institution_name","label":"Thesis Institution Name","values":["University of Missouri--Columbia"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["bioenergy crops","Biomass Crop Assistance Program","cropping systems","profitability"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language","label":"Dc Language","values":["English"]},{"key":"dc:language.iso","label":"Language (ISO)","values":["eng"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier.uri","label":"Identifier URI","values":["http://hdl.handle.net/10355/37934"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description","label":"Description","values":["Title from PDF of title page (University of Missouri--Columbia, viewed on September 9, 2013).","The entire thesis text is included in the research.pdf file; the official abstract appears in the short.pdf file; a non-technical public abstract appears in the public.pdf file.","Thesis advisor: Dr. Raymond Massey","Includes bibliographical references.","M.S. University of Missouri-Columbia, 2013.","Dissertations, Academic -- University of Missouri--Columbia -- Agricultural economics.","\"May 2013\""]},{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["Cellulosic biomass is among the most promising alternatives to fossil fuels being considered in Missouri. In order to become a viable energy source, there needs to be a reliable supply of cellulosic material. Miscanthus, switchgrass, or a native prairie mix are posed to meet that supply. This study analyzes the profitability of those three cropping systems when grown for bioenergy relative to corn and soybeans. It uses a stochastic budgeting model with actual grain yields, FAPRI baseline prices, and ALMANAC modeled grass yields to demonstrate how landscape soils, government programs like Biomass Crop Assistance Program (BCAP), and crop insurance affect the decision to plant bioenergy crops. The analysis assumes that the producers are risk averse and seek to maximize utility. Results show that perennial grasses grown for bioenergy have a higher relative profitability on flooded Belknap soils and Armstrong and Armster eroded upland soils versus Putnam soil which is non-eroded and upland, that government support increases profitability of these bioenergy crops but not enough for utility maximizing producers to choose them, and crop insurance decreases the likelihood of planting them by mitigating the risks associated with corn and soybeans."]},{"key":"dc:source","label":"Dc Source","values":["Submitted by the University of Missouri--Columbia Graduate School"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["An assessment of the impact of landscape soil, government programs and crop insurance on the profitability of perennial grass cropping systems grown for bioenergy"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor.advisor":["Massey, Raymond E., 1957-"],"dc:creator":["Dolginow, Joseph P."],"dc:date.accessioned":["2013-09-09T13:53:08Z"],"dc:date.available":["2013-09-09T13:53:08Z"],"dc:date.issued":["2013"],"dc:description":["Title from PDF of title page (University of Missouri--Columbia, viewed on September 9, 2013).","The entire thesis text is included in the research.pdf file; the official abstract appears in the short.pdf file; a non-technical public abstract appears in the public.pdf file.","Thesis advisor: Dr. Raymond Massey","Includes bibliographical references.","M.S. University of Missouri-Columbia, 2013.","Dissertations, Academic -- University of Missouri--Columbia -- Agricultural economics.","\"May 2013\""],"dc:description.abstract":["Cellulosic biomass is among the most promising alternatives to fossil fuels being considered in Missouri. In order to become a viable energy source, there needs to be a reliable supply of cellulosic material. Miscanthus, switchgrass, or a native prairie mix are posed to meet that supply. This study analyzes the profitability of those three cropping systems when grown for bioenergy relative to corn and soybeans. It uses a stochastic budgeting model with actual grain yields, FAPRI baseline prices, and ALMANAC modeled grass yields to demonstrate how landscape soils, government programs like Biomass Crop Assistance Program (BCAP), and crop insurance affect the decision to plant bioenergy crops. The analysis assumes that the producers are risk averse and seek to maximize utility. Results show that perennial grasses grown for bioenergy have a higher relative profitability on flooded Belknap soils and Armstrong and Armster eroded upland soils versus Putnam soil which is non-eroded and upland, that government support increases profitability of these bioenergy crops but not enough for utility maximizing producers to choose them, and crop insurance decreases the likelihood of planting them by mitigating the risks associated with corn and soybeans."],"dc:identifier.uri":["http://hdl.handle.net/10355/37934"],"dc:language":["English"],"dc:language.iso":["eng"],"dc:publisher":["University of Missouri--Columbia"],"dc:source":["Submitted by the University of Missouri--Columbia Graduate School"],"dc:subject":["bioenergy crops","Biomass Crop Assistance Program","cropping systems","profitability"],"dc:title":["An assessment of the impact of landscape soil, government programs and crop insurance on the profitability of perennial grass cropping systems grown for bioenergy"],"dc:type":["Thesis"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Agricultural economics (MU)"],"thesis:degree_level":["Masters"],"thesis:degree_name":["M.S."],"thesis:institution_name":["University of Missouri--Columbia"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-24T03:08:32Z"}