{"id":{"repo_id":"missouri","oai_identifier":"oai:mospace.umsystem.edu:10355/15195"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/missouri/oai:mospace.umsystem.edu:10355/15195","repository":{"repo_id":"missouri","name":"University of Missouri","base_url":"https://mospace.umsystem.edu/oai/request"},"display":{"title":"Role of failure in the construction of case libraries","abstract":"[ACCESS RESTRICTED TO THE UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI-COLUMBIA AT AUTHOR'S REQUEST.] One means by which to better support problem-solving and indoctrinate individuals is to employ case-based reasoning (CBR) in education. Instructional designers can support this form of learning by providing case libraries that embed domain-specific principles in the form of stories. The cases not only serve to portray experiences of practitioners, but serve as problem-solving narratives by which an individual can learn from and can acquire meaning. The current study investigated the effects of different case-types (success, failures) on analogical transfer. A group of undergraduate sales hiring and selection students (N=36) were provided learning environments that detailed ill-structured sales recruitment problems. In the first week, students were randomly assigned to different case library treatments (success, failure) and asked to construct a multifaceted argument (initial argument, counterargument, rebuttal) to resolve a decision-making hiring problem. In the following week, students constructed an argument to solve a novel case without the support of the case library. Data analysis revealed significantly significant differences for the failure-based case library condition on measurements of counterarguments and overall holistic argumentation scores. A discussion of the implications for pedagogy and instructional design are also presented.","abstract_html":"[ACCESS RESTRICTED TO THE UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI-COLUMBIA AT AUTHOR'S REQUEST.] One means by which to better support problem-solving and indoctrinate individuals is to employ case-based reasoning (CBR) in education. Instructional designers can support this form of learning by providing case libraries that embed domain-specific principles in the form of stories. The cases not only serve to portray experiences of practitioners, but serve as problem-solving narratives by which an individual can learn from and can acquire meaning. The current study investigated the effects of different case-types (success, failures) on analogical transfer. A group of undergraduate sales hiring and selection students (N=36) were provided learning environments that detailed ill-structured sales recruitment problems. In the first week, students were randomly assigned to different case library treatments (success, failure) and asked to construct a multifaceted argument (initial argument, counterargument, rebuttal) to resolve a decision-making hiring problem. In the following week, students constructed an argument to solve a novel case without the support of the case library. Data analysis revealed significantly significant differences for the failure-based case library condition on measurements of counterarguments and overall holistic argumentation scores. A discussion of the implications for pedagogy and instructional design are also presented.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Tawfik, Andrew"],"institution":"University of Missouri--Columbia","degree_name":"Ph. D.","degree_level":"Doctoral","degree_discipline":"Information science and learning technologies (MU)","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":[],"advisors":["Jonassen, David H., 1947-2012"],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2012,"date_issued":"2012","date_published":"2012","updated_at":"2026-07-24T03:08:54Z","subjects":["case-based reasoning","instructional design","analogical transfer"],"languages":["eng","English"],"rights":["Access to files is limited to the University of Missouri--Columbia with SSO login."],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier.doi","label":"DOI","values":["https://doi.org/10.32469/10355/15195"],"render_values":[{"text":"https://doi.org/10.32469/10355/15195","href":"https://doi.org/10.32469/10355/15195","code":true}]}]},"links":{"outbound_url":"https://hdl.handle.net/10355/15195","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier.uri"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor.advisor","label":"Advisor","values":["Jonassen, David H., 1947-2012"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Tawfik, Andrew"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date.accessioned","label":"Dc Date Accessioned","values":["2012-09-07T19:38:12Z"]},{"key":"dc:date.available","label":"Dc Date Available","values":["2012-09-07T19:38:12Z"]},{"key":"dc:date.issued","label":"Date","values":["2012"]},{"key":"dc:publisher","label":"Institution","values":["University of Missouri--Columbia"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["Thesis"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Information science and learning technologies (MU)"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Doctoral"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Ph. D."]},{"key":"thesis:institution_name","label":"Thesis Institution Name","values":["University of Missouri--Columbia"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["case-based reasoning","instructional design","analogical transfer"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language","label":"Dc Language","values":["English"]},{"key":"dc:language.iso","label":"Language (ISO)","values":["eng"]},{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["Access to files is limited to the University of Missouri--Columbia with SSO login."]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier.doi","label":"DOI","values":["https://doi.org/10.32469/10355/15195"]},{"key":"dc:identifier.uri","label":"Identifier URI","values":["https://hdl.handle.net/10355/15195"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description","label":"Description","values":["Title from PDF of title page (University of Missouri--Columbia, viewed on September 7, 2012).","The entire thesis text is included in the research.pdf file; the official abstract appears in the short.pdf file; a non-technical public abstract appears in the public.pdf file.","Dissertation advisor: Dr. David H. Jonassen","Includes bibliographical references.","Vita.","Ph. D. University of Missouri--Columbia 2012.","\"May 2012\""]},{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["[ACCESS RESTRICTED TO THE UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI-COLUMBIA AT AUTHOR'S REQUEST.] One means by which to better support problem-solving and indoctrinate individuals is to employ case-based reasoning (CBR) in education. Instructional designers can support this form of learning by providing case libraries that embed domain-specific principles in the form of stories. The cases not only serve to portray experiences of practitioners, but serve as problem-solving narratives by which an individual can learn from and can acquire meaning. The current study investigated the effects of different case-types (success, failures) on analogical transfer. A group of undergraduate sales hiring and selection students (N=36) were provided learning environments that detailed ill-structured sales recruitment problems. In the first week, students were randomly assigned to different case library treatments (success, failure) and asked to construct a multifaceted argument (initial argument, counterargument, rebuttal) to resolve a decision-making hiring problem. In the following week, students constructed an argument to solve a novel case without the support of the case library. Data analysis revealed significantly significant differences for the failure-based case library condition on measurements of counterarguments and overall holistic argumentation scores. A discussion of the implications for pedagogy and instructional design are also presented."]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Role of failure in the construction of case libraries"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor.advisor":["Jonassen, David H., 1947-2012"],"dc:creator":["Tawfik, Andrew"],"dc:date.accessioned":["2012-09-07T19:38:12Z"],"dc:date.available":["2012-09-07T19:38:12Z"],"dc:date.issued":["2012"],"dc:description":["Title from PDF of title page (University of Missouri--Columbia, viewed on September 7, 2012).","The entire thesis text is included in the research.pdf file; the official abstract appears in the short.pdf file; a non-technical public abstract appears in the public.pdf file.","Dissertation advisor: Dr. David H. Jonassen","Includes bibliographical references.","Vita.","Ph. D. University of Missouri--Columbia 2012.","\"May 2012\""],"dc:description.abstract":["[ACCESS RESTRICTED TO THE UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI-COLUMBIA AT AUTHOR'S REQUEST.] One means by which to better support problem-solving and indoctrinate individuals is to employ case-based reasoning (CBR) in education. Instructional designers can support this form of learning by providing case libraries that embed domain-specific principles in the form of stories. The cases not only serve to portray experiences of practitioners, but serve as problem-solving narratives by which an individual can learn from and can acquire meaning. The current study investigated the effects of different case-types (success, failures) on analogical transfer. A group of undergraduate sales hiring and selection students (N=36) were provided learning environments that detailed ill-structured sales recruitment problems. In the first week, students were randomly assigned to different case library treatments (success, failure) and asked to construct a multifaceted argument (initial argument, counterargument, rebuttal) to resolve a decision-making hiring problem. In the following week, students constructed an argument to solve a novel case without the support of the case library. Data analysis revealed significantly significant differences for the failure-based case library condition on measurements of counterarguments and overall holistic argumentation scores. A discussion of the implications for pedagogy and instructional design are also presented."],"dc:identifier.doi":["https://doi.org/10.32469/10355/15195"],"dc:identifier.uri":["https://hdl.handle.net/10355/15195"],"dc:language":["English"],"dc:language.iso":["eng"],"dc:publisher":["University of Missouri--Columbia"],"dc:rights":["Access to files is limited to the University of Missouri--Columbia with SSO login."],"dc:subject":["case-based reasoning","instructional design","analogical transfer"],"dc:title":["Role of failure in the construction of case libraries"],"dc:type":["Thesis"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Information science and learning technologies (MU)"],"thesis:degree_level":["Doctoral"],"thesis:degree_name":["Ph. D."],"thesis:institution_name":["University of Missouri--Columbia"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-24T03:08:54Z"}