Abstract
dc:description.abstractIn intention, G.E.M. Anscombe sets out to examine the standard ways in which we use the word "intention". To this end, she also examines desire and how desires play a role in our intentions. In the process, she divides desire into two distinct categories, those of weak and strong wanting. This distinction is quite different from ancient and modern views of desire, which are briefly discussed as a means of comparing Anscombe's view to her predecessors. After she has made this distinction, Anscombe tries to establish what is required of this new category of strong wanting. These requirements include knowledge of the existence of the thing, movement towards it, and so forth. This thesis then seeks to examine whether Anscombe's view is either well-developed or convincing. Through examination of Anscombe's requirements of desirability characterization and utilization of practical reasoning, the conclusion appears to be that her view is neither thoroughly developed nor adequately supported.
Degree
thesis:*- Name thesis:degree_name
- M.A. in Philosophy
- Level thesis:degree_level
- Thesis
- Discipline thesis:degree_discipline
- Philosophy and Religion
- Year dc:date.available
- 2013
Author and committee
dc:creator, dc:contributor.*- Author dc:creator
-
- Kunz, Mallory Dianne
- Contributors dc:contributor
-
- Steven Skultety
- Timothy P. Yenter
- Robert Westmoreland
Subjects
dc:subject × 1Identifiers
dc:identifier.*- Repository record dc:identifier
- https://egrove.olemiss.edu/etd/1110
- OAI identifier oai:identifier
- oai:egrove.olemiss.edu:etd-2109