Abstract
dc:description.abstractThere has been much debate as to whether partisanship matters on the local level in the United States. This thesis specifically seeks to test whether partisanship plays a role in an individuals’ selection of their ideal communities. Using data from the Kinder Houston Area Survey from 1982–2013, this thesis tests the effect of partisan differences in willingness to pay for: maintaining current levels of local services, public schools, and access to healthcare. As well as, partisan differences in selecting policy areas of concern for the City of Houston, and partisan differences in feelings towards ethnic diversity. I examine whether residents are choosing their ideal communities based on a sense of self-interest or whether this determination is shaped by their partisanship.
Degree
thesis:*- Name thesis:degree_name
- M.A. in Political Science
- Level thesis:degree_level
- Thesis
- Discipline thesis:degree_discipline
- Political Science
- Year dc:date.available
- 2016
Author and committee
dc:creator, dc:contributor.*- Author dc:creator
-
- Butler, Kayla M.
- Contributors dc:contributor
-
- Jonathan Winburn
- Conor Dowling
- Heather Ondercin
Subjects
dc:subject × 1Identifiers
dc:identifier.*- Repository record dc:identifier
- https://egrove.olemiss.edu/etd/779
- OAI identifier oai:identifier
- oai:egrove.olemiss.edu:etd-1778