Laughing Matters

This thesis defends a weak version of the superiority theory of humor: the superiority theory explains some instances of humor better than the incongruity theory. This thesis features an overview of the philosophy of humor in ancient, modern, and contemporary philosophy; this section contains criticisms of the incongruity theory. Connections between the superiority theory and humor about death are explored. Parallels are then drawn between this type of humor and Aristotle's great-souled man. A new type of laughter, jubilant laughter, is subsequently identified as being similar to laughter classified under the superiority theory since both exhibit a triumphant quality. But there is an important difference between the two: humor classified under the superiority theory involves a comparison with others while jubilant laughter does not. Finally, the implications of the superiority theory on the ethics of humor are examined, and ethical norms are adapted from Aristotle's account of the great-souled man.

Name thesis:degree_name

M.A. in Philosophy

Level thesis:degree_level

Thesis

Discipline thesis:degree_discipline

Philosophy and Religion

Year dc:date.available

2013

Author dc:creator

• Moore, Matthew

Contributors dc:contributor

• Robert Westmoreland
• Timothy P. Yenter
• Steven Skultety

• Death
• Incongruity Theory
• Jubilant Laughter
• Philosophy Of Humor
• Superiority Theory
• Philosophy

Repository record dc:identifier

https://egrove.olemiss.edu/etd/748

OAI identifier oai:identifier

oai:egrove.olemiss.edu:etd-1747