{"id":{"repo_id":"milano","oai_identifier":"oai:air.unimi.it:2434/1199638"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/milano/oai:air.unimi.it:2434/1199638","repository":{"repo_id":"milano","name":"Università degli Studi di Milano","base_url":"https://air.unimi.it/oai/request"},"display":{"title":"SOCIAL AND REPUTATIONAL DRIVERS OF SUNK-COST SENSITIVITY IN INDIVIDUAL AND COLLECTIVE DECISION-MAKING","abstract":"Why do people stick with failing plans after investing resources? This dissertation argues that sunk-cost behavior is shaped more by social pressures than by cognitive bias. Across three preregistered, “waste-free” studies, I show that people persist to protect reputation and relationships—especially when others have invested or when commitment signals reliability. When social audiences or obligations disappear, escalation fades. Additional chapters show that voters reward decision-makers who stay committed and develop a framework explaining both cognitive and social costs of changing course. Together, the work explains when sunk costs bind—and when they don’t.","abstract_html":"Why do people stick with failing plans after investing resources? This dissertation argues that sunk-cost behavior is shaped more by social pressures than by cognitive bias. Across three preregistered, “waste-free” studies, I show that people persist to protect reputation and relationships—especially when others have invested or when commitment signals reliability. When social audiences or obligations disappear, escalation fades. Additional chapters show that voters reward decision-makers who stay committed and develop a framework explaining both cognitive and social costs of changing course. Together, the work explains when sunk costs bind—and when they don’t.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["MATTEI, MARCO"],"institution":"Università degli Studi di Milano","degree_name":null,"degree_level":null,"degree_discipline":null,"degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["tutor: J. Michael ; secondo tutor: D. Buehler supervisori periodo visiting: N. Sebanz; G. Knoblich","M. Mattei","MICHAEL, JOHN ANDREW"],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2026,"date_issued":"2026-01-21","date_published":"2026-01-21","updated_at":"2026-07-27T20:19:00Z","subjects":["sunk cost","escalation of commitment","social signaling","reputation","relational concern","decision-making","commitment","political judgment","reliability signaling","Settore PHIL-02/A - Logica e filosofia della scienza","Settore PSIC-01/A - Psicologia generale"],"languages":["eng"],"rights":["info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess","license:Creative commons","license uri:http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/"],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["http://dx.doi.org/10.13130/mattei-marco_phd2025-01","10.13130/mattei-marco_phd2025-01"],"render_values":[{"text":"http://dx.doi.org/10.13130/mattei-marco_phd2025-01","href":"http://dx.doi.org/10.13130/mattei-marco_phd2025-01","code":true},{"text":"10.13130/mattei-marco_phd2025-01","href":"https://doi.org/10.13130/mattei-marco_phd2025-01","code":true}]}]},"links":{"outbound_url":"https://hdl.handle.net/2434/1199638","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["tutor: J. Michael ; secondo tutor: D. Buehler supervisori periodo visiting: N. Sebanz; G. Knoblich","M. Mattei","MICHAEL, JOHN ANDREW"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["MATTEI, MARCO"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date","label":"Dc Date","values":["2026-01-21"]},{"key":"dc:publisher","label":"Institution","values":["Università degli Studi di Milano"]},{"key":"dc:relation","label":"Dc Relation","values":["numberofpages:91"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["info:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["sunk cost","escalation of commitment","social signaling","reputation","relational concern","decision-making","commitment","political judgment","reliability signaling","Settore PHIL-02/A - Logica e filosofia della scienza","Settore PSIC-01/A - Psicologia generale"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language","label":"Dc Language","values":["eng"]},{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess","license:Creative commons","license uri:http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["http://dx.doi.org/10.13130/mattei-marco_phd2025-01","https://hdl.handle.net/2434/1199638","10.13130/mattei-marco_phd2025-01"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description","label":"Description","values":["Why do people stick with failing plans after investing resources? This dissertation argues that sunk-cost behavior is shaped more by social pressures than by cognitive bias. Across three preregistered, “waste-free” studies, I show that people persist to protect reputation and relationships—especially when others have invested or when commitment signals reliability. When social audiences or obligations disappear, escalation fades. Additional chapters show that voters reward decision-makers who stay committed and develop a framework explaining both cognitive and social costs of changing course. Together, the work explains when sunk costs bind—and when they don’t."]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["SOCIAL AND REPUTATIONAL DRIVERS OF SUNK-COST SENSITIVITY IN INDIVIDUAL AND COLLECTIVE DECISION-MAKING"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["tutor: J. Michael ; secondo tutor: D. Buehler supervisori periodo visiting: N. Sebanz; G. Knoblich","M. Mattei","MICHAEL, JOHN ANDREW"],"dc:creator":["MATTEI, MARCO"],"dc:date":["2026-01-21"],"dc:description":["Why do people stick with failing plans after investing resources? This dissertation argues that sunk-cost behavior is shaped more by social pressures than by cognitive bias. Across three preregistered, “waste-free” studies, I show that people persist to protect reputation and relationships—especially when others have invested or when commitment signals reliability. When social audiences or obligations disappear, escalation fades. Additional chapters show that voters reward decision-makers who stay committed and develop a framework explaining both cognitive and social costs of changing course. Together, the work explains when sunk costs bind—and when they don’t."],"dc:identifier":["http://dx.doi.org/10.13130/mattei-marco_phd2025-01","https://hdl.handle.net/2434/1199638","10.13130/mattei-marco_phd2025-01"],"dc:language":["eng"],"dc:publisher":["Università degli Studi di Milano"],"dc:relation":["numberofpages:91"],"dc:rights":["info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess","license:Creative commons","license uri:http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/"],"dc:subject":["sunk cost","escalation of commitment","social signaling","reputation","relational concern","decision-making","commitment","political judgment","reliability signaling","Settore PHIL-02/A - Logica e filosofia della scienza","Settore PSIC-01/A - Psicologia generale"],"dc:title":["SOCIAL AND REPUTATIONAL DRIVERS OF SUNK-COST SENSITIVITY IN INDIVIDUAL AND COLLECTIVE DECISION-MAKING"],"dc:type":["info:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-27T20:19:00Z"}