{"id":{"repo_id":"middlesex","oai_identifier":"oai:repository.mdx.ac.uk:88588"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/middlesex/oai:repository.mdx.ac.uk:88588","repository":{"repo_id":"middlesex","name":"Middlesex University","base_url":"https://repository.mdx.ac.uk/oai2"},"display":{"title":"The viceregal homiletic: an appropriation of G.K. Beale's Christian viceregency for theological consideration of Christian preaching","abstract":"This thesis argues that a particular perspective on Christian preaching, informed by the Christian concept of viceregency and summarily titled \"the viceregal homiletic\", is a new and distinct model for homiletical reflection. The viceregal homiletic's distinctiveness lies in its critical choice and development of G.K. Beale's understanding of Christian viceregency into an image for which to scrutinize the Christian preacher. Chapter 1 of this thesis argues that the viceregal homiletic is distinct from existing homiletical reflection because it proceeds in a theological mode of reflection. Chapter 2 of this thesis argues that the viceregal homiletic is distinct from existing homiletical reflection in the theological mode because it proceeds in a biblical-theological mode of reflection. Chapter 3 introduces and critiques the biblical-theological method of G.K. Beale, and proposes its suitability to inform the viceregal homiletic's theological vision of Christian preaching. Chapter 4 introduces and critiques G.K. Beale's understanding of Christian viceregency in order to clarify the viceregal homiletic's claim that the preacher is a Christian viceregent. Chapter 5 differentiates the viceregal homiletic from homiletics of Jason Meyer, Thomas Long, and John Stott.","abstract_html":"This thesis argues that a particular perspective on Christian preaching, informed by the Christian concept of viceregency and summarily titled "the viceregal homiletic", is a new and distinct model for homiletical reflection. The viceregal homiletic's distinctiveness lies in its critical choice and development of G.K. Beale's understanding of Christian viceregency into an image for which to scrutinize the Christian preacher. Chapter 1 of this thesis argues that the viceregal homiletic is distinct from existing homiletical reflection because it proceeds in a theological mode of reflection. Chapter 2 of this thesis argues that the viceregal homiletic is distinct from existing homiletical reflection in the theological mode because it proceeds in a biblical-theological mode of reflection. Chapter 3 introduces and critiques the biblical-theological method of G.K. Beale, and proposes its suitability to inform the viceregal homiletic's theological vision of Christian preaching. Chapter 4 introduces and critiques G.K. Beale's understanding of Christian viceregency in order to clarify the viceregal homiletic's claim that the preacher is a Christian viceregent. Chapter 5 differentiates the viceregal homiletic from homiletics of Jason Meyer, Thomas Long, and John Stott.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Wright, N."],"institution":"Middlesex University / London School of Theology (LST)","degree_name":null,"degree_level":"PhD thesis","degree_discipline":null,"degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":[],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2019,"date_issued":"2019","date_published":"2019","updated_at":"2026-07-24T03:04:30Z","subjects":[],"languages":[],"rights":[],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["oai:repository.mdx.ac.uk:88588"],"render_values":[{"text":"oai:repository.mdx.ac.uk:88588","href":null,"code":true}]}]},"links":{"outbound_url":null,"outbound_label":null,"outbound_source":null},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Wright, N."]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date","label":"Dc Date","values":["2019"]},{"key":"dc:date.issued","label":"Date","values":["2019"]},{"key":"dc:publisher.department","label":"Dc Publisher Department","values":["School of Law"]},{"key":"dc:publisher.institution","label":"Dc Publisher Institution","values":["Middlesex University / London School of Theology (LST)"]},{"key":"dc:relation","label":"Dc Relation","values":["https://repository.mdx.ac.uk/item/88588"]},{"key":"dc:relation.isreferencedby","label":"Dc Relation Isreferencedby","values":["https://repository.mdx.ac.uk/item/88588"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["Thesis or dissertation"]},{"key":"dc:type.qualificationlevel","label":"Dc Type Qualificationlevel","values":["PhD thesis"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["oai:repository.mdx.ac.uk:88588"]},{"key":"dc:identifier.uri","label":"Identifier URI","values":["https://repository.mdx.ac.uk/download/78d441fe01e75e518f2f7987b50946f8d8837c9ac8a1e6e346f5524ff90fac70/48579750/NMWright%20thesis.pdf"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description","label":"Description","values":["This thesis argues that a particular perspective on Christian preaching, informed by the Christian concept of viceregency and summarily titled \"the viceregal homiletic\", is a new and distinct model for homiletical reflection. The viceregal homiletic's distinctiveness lies in its critical choice and development of G.K. Beale's understanding of Christian viceregency into an image for which to scrutinize the Christian preacher. Chapter 1 of this thesis argues that the viceregal homiletic is distinct from existing homiletical reflection because it proceeds in a theological mode of reflection. Chapter 2 of this thesis argues that the viceregal homiletic is distinct from existing homiletical reflection in the theological mode because it proceeds in a biblical-theological mode of reflection. Chapter 3 introduces and critiques the biblical-theological method of G.K. Beale, and proposes its suitability to inform the viceregal homiletic's theological vision of Christian preaching. Chapter 4 introduces and critiques G.K. Beale's understanding of Christian viceregency in order to clarify the viceregal homiletic's claim that the preacher is a Christian viceregent. Chapter 5 differentiates the viceregal homiletic from homiletics of Jason Meyer, Thomas Long, and John Stott."]},{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["This thesis argues that a particular perspective on Christian preaching, informed by the Christian concept of viceregency and summarily titled \"the viceregal homiletic\", is a new and distinct model for homiletical reflection. The viceregal homiletic's distinctiveness lies in its critical choice and development of G.K. Beale's understanding of Christian viceregency into an image for which to scrutinize the Christian preacher. Chapter 1 of this thesis argues that the viceregal homiletic is distinct from existing homiletical reflection because it proceeds in a theological mode of reflection. Chapter 2 of this thesis argues that the viceregal homiletic is distinct from existing homiletical reflection in the theological mode because it proceeds in a biblical-theological mode of reflection. Chapter 3 introduces and critiques the biblical-theological method of G.K. Beale, and proposes its suitability to inform the viceregal homiletic's theological vision of Christian preaching. Chapter 4 introduces and critiques G.K. Beale's understanding of Christian viceregency in order to clarify the viceregal homiletic's claim that the preacher is a Christian viceregent. Chapter 5 differentiates the viceregal homiletic from homiletics of Jason Meyer, Thomas Long, and John Stott."]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["The viceregal homiletic: an appropriation of G.K. Beale's Christian viceregency for theological consideration of Christian preaching"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:creator":["Wright, N."],"dc:date":["2019"],"dc:date.issued":["2019"],"dc:description":["This thesis argues that a particular perspective on Christian preaching, informed by the Christian concept of viceregency and summarily titled \"the viceregal homiletic\", is a new and distinct model for homiletical reflection. The viceregal homiletic's distinctiveness lies in its critical choice and development of G.K. Beale's understanding of Christian viceregency into an image for which to scrutinize the Christian preacher. Chapter 1 of this thesis argues that the viceregal homiletic is distinct from existing homiletical reflection because it proceeds in a theological mode of reflection. Chapter 2 of this thesis argues that the viceregal homiletic is distinct from existing homiletical reflection in the theological mode because it proceeds in a biblical-theological mode of reflection. Chapter 3 introduces and critiques the biblical-theological method of G.K. Beale, and proposes its suitability to inform the viceregal homiletic's theological vision of Christian preaching. Chapter 4 introduces and critiques G.K. Beale's understanding of Christian viceregency in order to clarify the viceregal homiletic's claim that the preacher is a Christian viceregent. Chapter 5 differentiates the viceregal homiletic from homiletics of Jason Meyer, Thomas Long, and John Stott."],"dc:description.abstract":["This thesis argues that a particular perspective on Christian preaching, informed by the Christian concept of viceregency and summarily titled \"the viceregal homiletic\", is a new and distinct model for homiletical reflection. The viceregal homiletic's distinctiveness lies in its critical choice and development of G.K. Beale's understanding of Christian viceregency into an image for which to scrutinize the Christian preacher. Chapter 1 of this thesis argues that the viceregal homiletic is distinct from existing homiletical reflection because it proceeds in a theological mode of reflection. Chapter 2 of this thesis argues that the viceregal homiletic is distinct from existing homiletical reflection in the theological mode because it proceeds in a biblical-theological mode of reflection. Chapter 3 introduces and critiques the biblical-theological method of G.K. Beale, and proposes its suitability to inform the viceregal homiletic's theological vision of Christian preaching. Chapter 4 introduces and critiques G.K. Beale's understanding of Christian viceregency in order to clarify the viceregal homiletic's claim that the preacher is a Christian viceregent. Chapter 5 differentiates the viceregal homiletic from homiletics of Jason Meyer, Thomas Long, and John Stott."],"dc:identifier":["oai:repository.mdx.ac.uk:88588"],"dc:identifier.uri":["https://repository.mdx.ac.uk/download/78d441fe01e75e518f2f7987b50946f8d8837c9ac8a1e6e346f5524ff90fac70/48579750/NMWright%20thesis.pdf"],"dc:publisher.department":["School of Law"],"dc:publisher.institution":["Middlesex University / London School of Theology (LST)"],"dc:relation":["https://repository.mdx.ac.uk/item/88588"],"dc:relation.isreferencedby":["https://repository.mdx.ac.uk/item/88588"],"dc:title":["The viceregal homiletic: an appropriation of G.K. Beale's Christian viceregency for theological consideration of Christian preaching"],"dc:type":["Thesis or dissertation"],"dc:type.qualificationlevel":["PhD thesis"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-24T03:04:30Z"}