University of Melbourne
Buddhism and the state in Burma: English-language discourses from 1823 to 1962
Abstract
dc:description.abstractThis thesis examines three English-language discourses on the relationship between Buddhism and the state in Burma: its core focus is a postcolonial narrative produced largely by Burmese lay Buddhists writing in English, a narrative that I examine with reference to two other Anglophone discourses – a nineteenth and early twentieth-century colonial European narrative and a mid- twentieth-century narrative produced by academic historians and other scholars, most of them non- Burmese. The thesis contributes to recent scholarly efforts reappraising the narrative of Buddhist primordialism or changelessness in Burmese state-society relations that has dominated English- language scholarship on Burma in the twentieth century. I also highlight the significance of English as a language for discussing Buddhism in Burma, paying particular attention to the colonial and early postcolonial periods, when English was a language of education and statecraft. The thesis begins by examining the emergence of twentieth-century English-language scholarly discourse on the relationship between Buddhism and the state in precolonial Burma. I suggest that three core concepts have guided the modern academic understanding of this relationship: the concept of the state as a religious entity, the concept of the state as a harmonious mirror of the greater Buddhist cosmos and the concept of the sangha as the state’s most influential constituency beside the monarch. I trace the emergence of these core concepts by examining three influential texts by three well-known scholars produced at three different periods in the twentieth century. I use this academic discourse about the relationship between Buddhism and the state in precolonial Burma as a point of reference and contrast for the other two strands of English-language writing that this thesis examines – colonial-era discourse and the postcolonial discourse which inherits and challenges colonial ideologies. The thesis then considers an earlier stratum of English-language commentary on Burmese religion and society produced by precolonial and colonial observers between the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. These writers contrasted a ‘pure’ idealised Buddhism with a ‘corrupt’ and ‘degenerate’ Burma, setting up a dichotomy between a simple and ‘correct’ textual template and a degenerate local reality. I assert that there is a continuum of English-language discourse about Buddhism in Burma: while the British deployed this narrative as a justification for colonialism, it was coopted by later postcolonial authors who placed a ‘pure’ Buddhism at the centre of Burmese political life, subverting the characterisation of Burma as backward. The core of the thesis is an analysis of how postcolonial lay Burmese authors, writing about Buddhism in English in the years from 1948 to 1962, imagined Buddhism as a modern philosophy in an effort to lend religious legitimacy to the postcolonial state. This discourse linked Buddhism to three key ideologies that epitomised modernity: science, socialism and democracy. The similarities of Buddhist doctrine to scientific theories and to Marxist materialism and democratic individualism were emphasised in an effort to imagine Buddhism as a rational and modern philosophy. Colonial discourses were both inherited and refuted in an attempt to articulate a Burmese Buddhist modernity.
Author and committee
dc:creator, dc:contributor.*- Author dc:creator
-
- Winfield, Jordan Carlyle
Subjects
dc:subject × 3Rights
dc:rights- Statement dc:rights
-
- Terms and Conditions: Copyright in works deposited in Minerva Access is retained by the copyright owner. The work may not be altered without permission from the copyright owner. Readers may only download, print and save electronic copies of whole works for their own personal non-commercial use. Any use that exceeds these limits requires permission from the copyright owner. Attribution is essential when quoting or paraphrasing from these works.
Identifiers
dc:identifier.*- Handle dc:identifier.uri
- http://hdl.handle.net/11343/198396
- OAI identifier oai:identifier
- oai:jupiter.its.unimelb.edu.au:11343/198396