Back to results

Massey University

Being a thing : an analysis of neccessitist metaphysics in first-order quantified modal logic : [a thesis presented in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in Philosophy at Massey University, New Zealand]

Abstract

Timothy Williamson, a necessitist, argues that ‘necessarily everything is necessarily something’. However his claim is ambiguous regarding the kind of modal structure it endorses, with each structural candidate resulting in distinct metaphysical stakes. In this piece I outline each of the structural candidates and analyse them —both logically and metaphysically—within and against Kripkean first-order free logic. I show that the problems Williamson raises with contingentist logic similarly cause problems inside necessitist models. I conclude with a surprising suggestion: a modal logic that treats variables as individual-world pairs, along with a radical form of necessitism that treats quantification as metaphysically primitive.

Author and committee

dc:creator, dc:contributor.*
Author
  • Hawkins, Nathan

Identifiers

dc:identifier.*
Identifier
hdl:10179/10069
OAI identifier oai:identifier
oai:mro.massey.ac.nz:10179/10069

Chain of custody

source
Harvested from
Massey University
Base URL
mro.massey.ac.nz/server/oai/request
Last updated
2026-07-27
Source record
OAI-PMH GetRecord
related terms
citation

Hawkins, Nathan. Being a thing : an analysis of neccessitist metaphysics in first-order quantified modal logic : [a thesis presented in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in Philosophy at Massey University, New Zealand]. 2016.