P(L)AYING FOR THE FUTURE: THE COALESCING OF YOUTH, SPORT, AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT IN CHARM CITY
This project explores how Sport-Based Youth Development (SBYD) has been arrived at as an ideal vehicle for youth development in contemporary Baltimore. To understand the SBYD approach, the project seeks to explore four interrelated empirically grounded sites/questions that explain why sport is expected to help develop, discipline, and prepare youth and communities for the future. Three key themes emerged from this work: 1) that youth must be problematized by different ideas, beliefs, and discourses to make them ‘amenable’ to being targets of SBYD; 2) that organizations are pushed into competing with one another rather than collaborating due to the need of the state to maintain control of how youth are incorporated into society; and 3) that various tools and techniques are used through the vehicle of sport to inculcate specific values into underserved youth and their communities. The first chapter identifies two of the key theoretical positions/approaches that inform the project: Governmentality and Articulation as theory/method. The second chapter provides an overview of how scholars have examined the phenomenon of Sport for Development and Peace as a historical, methodological, and empirical site. The third chapter identifies the methods and methodologies that underpin the project. The fourth chapter provides a brief reflexive overview of how I arrived in Baltimore to conduct the project. The fifth chapter seeks to (explore) how Baltimore’s underserved citizens have been positioned as targets of SBYD as conceived of by politicians, providers, public servants, and citizens of the city, state, and nation. The project found that SBYD in Baltimore is a product of specific policies, processes, decisions, ideologies, and discourses that conspire to create a specific understanding of youth and communities as ripe for and requiring intervention through sport and other recreational pursuits to reform their behavior and orientation towards neoliberal social values that has evolved over the last fifty years. The sixth chapter examines/explicates how discourses of youth, their future, and the role of sport are used by three SBYD organizations to connect with potential participants, to obtain resources and funding, and to report on their activities and programming to measure the impact on the targeted community. The project found that underserved youth and communities are subjectivated by discourses of responsibility, deficiency, the unknown future, and the perceived American values of neoliberal meritocracy. These discourses were conveyed by programs via their websites, curricula, tax documents, and other forms of media to funders, participants and other valueholders. The seventh chapter identifies how organizations make use of formal and informal relationships to support the implementation of programming, to obtain funding, and to support organizations as they seek to legitimize their operations and activities in the eyes of valueholders. The project found that the use of formal and informal relationships by valueholders and organizations enables SBYD providers to secure access to funding, space, and capacity to support program initiatives. The eighth chapter seeks to engage with the beliefs, perspectives, and values of SBYD providers and valueholders to understand how these personal ideas and views shape the implementation of SBYD in Baltimore by speaking to the staff of three organizations operating within the city. The project found that the production of SBYD programming is facilitated and challenged by perceptions of the youth and community, ideas about the purpose and value of sport, and a broader rooting of ideas about youth and communities in urban stereotypes. By examining these four sites/questions, the project identifies how SBYD is assembled into a disciplining, educating, rationalizing tool to create productive youth for the future. The project ends by identifying new areas of research such as education initiatives for volunteers to contextualize the communities they work in, challenges and limitations such as completing research during the COVID-19 Pandemic, and key takeaways such as connecting with youth to move away from abstract stereotypes of urban life.
Networked Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations