{"id":{"repo_id":"lsu-thes","oai_identifier":"oai:repository.lsu.edu:gradschool_dissertations-2137"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/lsu-thes/oai:repository.lsu.edu:gradschool_dissertations-2137","repository":{"repo_id":"lsu-thes","name":"Lousiana State University","base_url":"https://repository.lsu.edu/do/oai/"},"display":{"title":"Public relations ethics: a cross-cultural analysis","abstract":"This two-part study employed 11 qualitative interviews, the Defining Issues Test (DIT) and a quantitative version of the five-factor TARES test to complete the first cross-cultural analysis of the ethical decision-making patterns of public relations practitioners. The DIT is an instrument based on Kohlberg’s (1969) moral development theory, the TARES test composed of 14 self-enforced, ethical consideration statements derived from the research of Baker and Martinson (2001). Results indicate no statistically significant difference in levels of moral development and ethical consideration between sampled practitioners in Australia, New Zealand and the United States (Lieber, 2003). This finding argues for a vocational uniformity in moral and ethical reasoning across these countries despite geographic, cultural, economic and ethnic disparities.","abstract_html":"This two-part study employed 11 qualitative interviews, the Defining Issues Test (DIT) and a quantitative version of the five-factor TARES test to complete the first cross-cultural analysis of the ethical decision-making patterns of public relations practitioners. The DIT is an instrument based on Kohlberg’s (1969) moral development theory, the TARES test composed of 14 self-enforced, ethical consideration statements derived from the research of Baker and Martinson (2001). Results indicate no statistically significant difference in levels of moral development and ethical consideration between sampled practitioners in Australia, New Zealand and the United States (Lieber, 2003). This finding argues for a vocational uniformity in moral and ethical reasoning across these countries despite geographic, cultural, economic and ethnic disparities.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Lieber, Paul Stuart"],"institution":"Mass Communication","degree_name":"Doctor of Philosophy (PhD)","degree_level":"Dissertation","degree_discipline":"Mass Communication","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":[],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2005,"date_issued":"2005-01-01T08:00:00Z","date_published":"2005-01-01T08:00:00Z","updated_at":"2026-07-24T02:59:03Z","subjects":["New Zealand","Australia","moral development","cross-cultural","ethics","public relations","TARES","defining issues test"],"languages":[],"rights":["unrestricted","Release the entire work immediately for access worldwide."],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["etd-12092004-163021","https://repository.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations/1138"],"render_values":[{"text":"etd-12092004-163021","href":null,"code":true},{"text":"https://repository.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations/1138","href":"https://repository.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations/1138","code":true}]}]},"links":{"outbound_url":"https://doi.org/10.31390/gradschool_dissertations.1138","outbound_label":"DOI","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Lieber, Paul Stuart"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date","label":"Dc Date","values":["2004-12-02"]},{"key":"dc:date.available","label":"Dc Date Available","values":["2022-05-12T23:11:08Z"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Mass Communication"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Dissertation"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Doctor of Philosophy (PhD)"]},{"key":"thesis:institution_name","label":"Thesis Institution Name","values":["Mass Communication"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["New Zealand","Australia","moral development","cross-cultural","ethics","public relations","TARES","defining issues test"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["unrestricted","Release the entire work immediately for access worldwide."]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["etd-12092004-163021","10.31390/gradschool_dissertations.1138","https://repository.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations/1138"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["This two-part study employed 11 qualitative interviews, the Defining Issues Test (DIT) and a quantitative version of the five-factor TARES test to complete the first cross-cultural analysis of the ethical decision-making patterns of public relations practitioners. The DIT is an instrument based on Kohlberg’s (1969) moral development theory, the TARES test composed of 14 self-enforced, ethical consideration statements derived from the research of Baker and Martinson (2001). Results indicate no statistically significant difference in levels of moral development and ethical consideration between sampled practitioners in Australia, New Zealand and the United States (Lieber, 2003). This finding argues for a vocational uniformity in moral and ethical reasoning across these countries despite geographic, cultural, economic and ethnic disparities."]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Public relations ethics: a cross-cultural analysis"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:creator":["Lieber, Paul Stuart"],"dc:date":["2004-12-02"],"dc:date.available":["2022-05-12T23:11:08Z"],"dc:description.abstract":["This two-part study employed 11 qualitative interviews, the Defining Issues Test (DIT) and a quantitative version of the five-factor TARES test to complete the first cross-cultural analysis of the ethical decision-making patterns of public relations practitioners. The DIT is an instrument based on Kohlberg’s (1969) moral development theory, the TARES test composed of 14 self-enforced, ethical consideration statements derived from the research of Baker and Martinson (2001). Results indicate no statistically significant difference in levels of moral development and ethical consideration between sampled practitioners in Australia, New Zealand and the United States (Lieber, 2003). This finding argues for a vocational uniformity in moral and ethical reasoning across these countries despite geographic, cultural, economic and ethnic disparities."],"dc:identifier":["etd-12092004-163021","10.31390/gradschool_dissertations.1138","https://repository.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations/1138"],"dc:rights":["unrestricted","Release the entire work immediately for access worldwide."],"dc:subject":["New Zealand","Australia","moral development","cross-cultural","ethics","public relations","TARES","defining issues test"],"dc:title":["Public relations ethics: a cross-cultural analysis"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Mass Communication"],"thesis:degree_level":["Dissertation"],"thesis:degree_name":["Doctor of Philosophy (PhD)"],"thesis:institution_name":["Mass Communication"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-24T02:59:03Z"}