Assessment of instructional methodologies and student information processing styles in a terrorism preparedness course
type: CreativeWork
description: The focus of the research was the evaluation of two instructional methodologies for teaching terrorism preparedness at several universities in Louisiana. Participants were taught a curriculum for an audience who may work at a potential terrorist target. The purpose of the research was to determine if processing styles based instruction improved learning. The objectives of the study were to: 1) Describe participant demographics: a) age, b) gender, c) credit hours, d) field of study; and e) preferred Strategic Information Processing Style (SIPS); 2) Determine if changes occur in knowledge of terrorism preparedness as measured by the Terrorism Awareness test; 3) Determine if there are differences in the test scores based on instructional methodology; 4) Determine if test scores differ by preferred Information Processing Style (IPS); and 5) Determine if selected variables explain a significant portion of the variability in the Terrorism Awareness Test scores. The majority of students were female. The average age was 21 years, and the range was 17 - 52. The mean number of credit hours completed was 55.69. Students, for the most part (n = 141 or 45.8%), reported majoring in social sciences. Assessment of students’ Information Processing Style (IPS) revealed that two thirds (n = 210 or 68.2%) preferred the Analytical Processing Style. A Paired Samples t-test revealed that the student’s post-test score (M = 14.02) were higher than the pre-test score (M = 13.61). The Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) revealed that the students taught using traditional lecture style scored higher on the Terrorism Awareness Test then those taught using the learning style based method. Regression analysis revealed that demographic variables did not explain a significant proportion of the variance. The model explains a moderate amount of the variance (25.5%). The instruction methodology variable by itself explains a low amount of variance. This study suggests that this particular curriculum which …
abstract: The focus of the research was the evaluation of two instructional methodologies for teaching terrorism preparedness at several universities in Louisiana. Participants were taught a curriculum for an audience who may work at a potential terrorist target. The purpose of the research was to determine if processing styles based instruction improved learning. The objectives of the study were to: 1) Describe participant demographics: a) age, b) gender, c) credit hours, d) field of study; and e) preferred Strategic Information Processing Style (SIPS); 2) Determine if changes occur in knowledge of terrorism preparedness as measured by the Terrorism Awareness test; 3) Determine if there are differences in the test scores based on instructional methodology; 4) Determine if test scores differ by preferred Information Processing Style (IPS); and 5) Determine if selected variables explain a significant portion of the variability in the Terrorism Awareness Test scores. The majority of students were female. The average age was 21 years, and the range was 17 - 52. The mean number of credit hours completed was 55.69. Students, for the most part (n = 141 or 45.8%), reported majoring in social sciences. Assessment of students’ Information Processing Style (IPS) revealed that two thirds (n = 210 or 68.2%) preferred the Analytical Processing Style. A Paired Samples t-test revealed that the student’s post-test score (M = 14.02) were higher than the pre-test score (M = 13.61). The Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) revealed that the students taught using traditional lecture style scored higher on the Terrorism Awareness Test then those taught using the learning style based method. Regression analysis revealed that demographic variables did not explain a significant proportion of the variance. The model explains a moderate amount of the variance (25.5%). The instruction methodology variable by itself explains a low amount of variance. This study suggests that this particular curriculum which …
author: McCarthy, William James
keywords: terrorism, terrorism preparedness, learning styles
date published: 2004-01-01T08:00:00Z
date modified: 2026-07-24T02:57:39Z
provider: Lousiana State University
publisher: Networked Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations
type: WebPage
source organization: Human Resource Education and Workforce Development

PropertyValue
property ID: DOI
value: 10.31390/gradschool_dissertations.467