{"id":{"repo_id":"london-metro","oai_identifier":"oai:repository.londonmet.ac.uk:7417"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/london-metro/oai:repository.londonmet.ac.uk:7417","repository":{"repo_id":"london-metro","name":"London Metropolitan University","base_url":"https://repository.londonmet.ac.uk/cgi/oai2"},"display":{"title":"Understanding the relationship between religion and well-being: a mixed methods investigation into religious maturity and psychological well-being","abstract":"Despite a recent resurgence of interest in the field of religion and well-being, the psychological understanding of the relationship between these 2 phenomena remains limited. A review of relevant literature indicated that focusing on the potential relationship between religious maturity (RM) as conceptualised by Allport (1950) and a multidimensional conceptualisation of psychological well-being (PWB) might represent a fruitful way forward. The mixed parallel design adopted by this research was composed of a quantitative strand (Study-l) investigating the extent to which RM predicted PWB and the mediating impact of self-actualisation, meaning in life and self-esteem and a qualitative strand (Study-2) exploring the hypothesized relationship and possible intennediary mechanisms and processes in a more open-ended manner. A sample of 138 adult UK residents from a Catholic or Protestant religious background were recruited for Study-l 's purposes while, using maximum variation sampling, 4 interviewees were selected for Study-2 from the initial pool of participants. Study-l's findings indicated that, although RM was not a significant predictor of PWB, higher levels of master-motive predicted higher levels of PWB, mainly through meaning in life, while higher levels of openness predicted lower levels of PWB, mainly through selfesteem. Study-2 yielded a theoretical model postulating a set of diverse religiosity facets impacting well-being through a series of intermediary processes involving multiple psychological domains. In conjunction, both studies seemed to point towards affording religiosity a central and pervasive role in life as having a salubrious effect, offered support for the explanatory benefits of employing a humanistic-existential theoretical frame in this inquiry field and placed an emphasis on meaning-making playing a primary intennediary role in the relationship of interest. Finally, suggestions for future research are proposed and implications for both the theory and practice of CoP are explored.","abstract_html":"Despite a recent resurgence of interest in the field of religion and well-being, the psychological understanding of the relationship between these 2 phenomena remains limited. A review of relevant literature indicated that focusing on the potential relationship between religious maturity (RM) as conceptualised by Allport (1950) and a multidimensional conceptualisation of psychological well-being (PWB) might represent a fruitful way forward. The mixed parallel design adopted by this research was composed of a quantitative strand (Study-l) investigating the extent to which RM predicted PWB and the mediating impact of self-actualisation, meaning in life and self-esteem and a qualitative strand (Study-2) exploring the hypothesized relationship and possible intennediary mechanisms and processes in a more open-ended manner. A sample of 138 adult UK residents from a Catholic or Protestant religious background were recruited for Study-l 's purposes while, using maximum variation sampling, 4 interviewees were selected for Study-2 from the initial pool of participants. Study-l's findings indicated that, although RM was not a significant predictor of PWB, higher levels of master-motive predicted higher levels of PWB, mainly through meaning in life, while higher levels of openness predicted lower levels of PWB, mainly through selfesteem. Study-2 yielded a theoretical model postulating a set of diverse religiosity facets impacting well-being through a series of intermediary processes involving multiple psychological domains. In conjunction, both studies seemed to point towards affording religiosity a central and pervasive role in life as having a salubrious effect, offered support for the explanatory benefits of employing a humanistic-existential theoretical frame in this inquiry field and placed an emphasis on meaning-making playing a primary intennediary role in the relationship of interest. Finally, suggestions for future research are proposed and implications for both the theory and practice of CoP are explored.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Caruana, Julian"],"institution":"London Metropolitan University","degree_name":"other","degree_level":"doctoral","degree_discipline":null,"degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":[],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2013,"date_issued":"2013","date_published":"2013","updated_at":"2026-07-24T02:54:38Z","subjects":["150 Psychology"],"languages":[],"rights":[],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier.grantnumber","label":"Dc Identifier Grantnumber","values":["N/A"],"render_values":[{"text":"N/A","href":null,"code":true}]}]},"links":{"outbound_url":null,"outbound_label":null,"outbound_source":null},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor.sponsor","label":"Sponsor","values":["London Metropolitan University"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Caruana, Julian"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date","label":"Dc Date","values":["2013"]},{"key":"dc:date.issued","label":"Date","values":["2013"]},{"key":"dc:publisher.department","label":"Dc Publisher Department","values":["School of Social Professions - to June 2021","School of Social Professions"]},{"key":"dc:publisher.institution","label":"Dc Publisher Institution","values":["London Metropolitan University"]},{"key":"dc:relation.isreferencedby","label":"Dc Relation Isreferencedby","values":["https://repository.londonmet.ac.uk/7417/"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["Thesis"]},{"key":"dc:type.qualificationlevel","label":"Dc Type Qualificationlevel","values":["doctoral"]},{"key":"dc:type.qualificationname","label":"Dc Type Qualificationname","values":["other"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["150 Psychology"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier.grantnumber","label":"Dc Identifier Grantnumber","values":["N/A"]},{"key":"dc:identifier.uri","label":"Identifier URI","values":["https://repository.londonmet.ac.uk/7417/1/595665.pdf"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["Despite a recent resurgence of interest in the field of religion and well-being, the psychological understanding of the relationship between these 2 phenomena remains limited. A review of relevant literature indicated that focusing on the potential relationship between religious maturity (RM) as conceptualised by Allport (1950) and a multidimensional conceptualisation of psychological well-being (PWB) might represent a fruitful way forward. The mixed parallel design adopted by this research was composed of a quantitative strand (Study-l) investigating the extent to which RM predicted PWB and the mediating impact of self-actualisation, meaning in life and self-esteem and a qualitative strand (Study-2) exploring the hypothesized relationship and possible intennediary mechanisms and processes in a more open-ended manner. A sample of 138 adult UK residents from a Catholic or Protestant religious background were recruited for Study-l 's purposes while, using maximum variation sampling, 4 interviewees were selected for Study-2 from the initial pool of participants. Study-l's findings indicated that, although RM was not a significant predictor of PWB, higher levels of master-motive predicted higher levels of PWB, mainly through meaning in life, while higher levels of openness predicted lower levels of PWB, mainly through selfesteem. Study-2 yielded a theoretical model postulating a set of diverse religiosity facets impacting well-being through a series of intermediary processes involving multiple psychological domains. In conjunction, both studies seemed to point towards affording religiosity a central and pervasive role in life as having a salubrious effect, offered support for the explanatory benefits of employing a humanistic-existential theoretical frame in this inquiry field and placed an emphasis on meaning-making playing a primary intennediary role in the relationship of interest. Finally, suggestions for future research are proposed and implications for both the theory and practice of CoP are explored."]},{"key":"dc:format","label":"Dc Format","values":["text"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Understanding the relationship between religion and well-being: a mixed methods investigation into religious maturity and psychological well-being"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor.sponsor":["London Metropolitan University"],"dc:creator":["Caruana, Julian"],"dc:date":["2013"],"dc:date.issued":["2013"],"dc:description.abstract":["Despite a recent resurgence of interest in the field of religion and well-being, the psychological understanding of the relationship between these 2 phenomena remains limited. A review of relevant literature indicated that focusing on the potential relationship between religious maturity (RM) as conceptualised by Allport (1950) and a multidimensional conceptualisation of psychological well-being (PWB) might represent a fruitful way forward. The mixed parallel design adopted by this research was composed of a quantitative strand (Study-l) investigating the extent to which RM predicted PWB and the mediating impact of self-actualisation, meaning in life and self-esteem and a qualitative strand (Study-2) exploring the hypothesized relationship and possible intennediary mechanisms and processes in a more open-ended manner. A sample of 138 adult UK residents from a Catholic or Protestant religious background were recruited for Study-l 's purposes while, using maximum variation sampling, 4 interviewees were selected for Study-2 from the initial pool of participants. Study-l's findings indicated that, although RM was not a significant predictor of PWB, higher levels of master-motive predicted higher levels of PWB, mainly through meaning in life, while higher levels of openness predicted lower levels of PWB, mainly through selfesteem. Study-2 yielded a theoretical model postulating a set of diverse religiosity facets impacting well-being through a series of intermediary processes involving multiple psychological domains. In conjunction, both studies seemed to point towards affording religiosity a central and pervasive role in life as having a salubrious effect, offered support for the explanatory benefits of employing a humanistic-existential theoretical frame in this inquiry field and placed an emphasis on meaning-making playing a primary intennediary role in the relationship of interest. Finally, suggestions for future research are proposed and implications for both the theory and practice of CoP are explored."],"dc:format":["text"],"dc:identifier.grantnumber":["N/A"],"dc:identifier.uri":["https://repository.londonmet.ac.uk/7417/1/595665.pdf"],"dc:publisher.department":["School of Social Professions - to June 2021","School of Social Professions"],"dc:publisher.institution":["London Metropolitan University"],"dc:relation.isreferencedby":["https://repository.londonmet.ac.uk/7417/"],"dc:subject":["150 Psychology"],"dc:title":["Understanding the relationship between religion and well-being: a mixed methods investigation into religious maturity and psychological well-being"],"dc:type":["Thesis"],"dc:type.qualificationlevel":["doctoral"],"dc:type.qualificationname":["other"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-24T02:54:38Z"}