Back to results

Loma Linda University

A Comparison of the Nance Holding Arch and Kloehn Headgear in Maxilliary Molar Anchorage

Abstract

dc:description.abstract

<p>A sample of thirty first bicuspid extraction patients, ages 9 through adult, were evaluated for maxillary molar anchorage loss during cuspid retraction. The Nance Holding Arch and Kloehn cervical headgear were compared as anchorage devices. A control group received no anchorage mechanics during cuspid retraction. All cuspids were retracted with Hilger's loop retractors.</p> <p>Anchorage loss was measured cephalometrically by comparing the difference in the 6 to PTV measurement on the initial and post cuspid retraction lateral head films.</p> <p>Anchorage loss, as the dependent variable, was compared to the study groups, Angle class, facial type, treatment length, palatal angle and distance of cuspid retraction as independent variables.</p> <p>Eighteen patients were treated with the Nance Holding Arch, six with Kloehn cervical headgear and six with no anchorage mechanics during cuspid retraction. Results show no significant difference in mean anchorage loss in the three groups (Nance = 1.288 mm loss; Headgear = 0.833 mm loss; Control = 1.583 mm loss).</p> <p>Initial molar Angle classification had no significant effect on maxillary molar anchorage. This study showed the least anchorage loss in the Class II end-on sample and the greatest loss in the Class I sample.</p> <p>Dolichofacial patients demonstrated greater anchorage loss than Brachyfacial patients but the difference was not significant. (1.76 mm and 1.26 mm respectively.)</p> <p>Although not significant statistically, steeper, high vaulted palates tend to provide greater molar anchorage when the Nance Holding Arch is used.</p> <p>No correlation was demonstrated between anchorage loss and length of treatment (T<sub>1</sub> radiograph to cuspids retracted radiograph).</p> <p>The study showed that the upper molar position can be reliably traced and evaluated for anchorage loss.</p>

Degree

thesis:*
Name thesis:degree_name
Master of Science (MS)
Level thesis:degree_level
Thesis
Discipline thesis:degree_discipline
Dentistry
Year
1984

Author and committee

dc:creator, dc:contributor.*
Author dc:creator
  • Fillman, Michael J.
Contributors dc:contributor
  • J. Milford Anholm
  • Alden B. Chase
  • Lawrence McEwen
  • Willis L. Schlenker

Subjects

dc:subject × 2

Rights

dc:rights
Statement dc:rights
  • This title appears here courtesy of the author, who has granted Loma Linda University a limited, non-exclusive right to make this publication available to the public. The author retains all other copyrights.
Language dc:language
English

Identifiers

dc:identifier.*
Repository record dc:identifier
https://scholarsrepository.llu.edu/etd/1336
OAI identifier oai:identifier
oai:scholarsrepository.llu.edu:etd-2787

Chain of custody

source
Harvested from
Loma Linda University
Base URL
scholarsrepository.llu.edu/do/oai/
Last updated
2026-07-24
Source record
OAI-PMH GetRecord
citation

Fillman, Michael J.. A Comparison of the Nance Holding Arch and Kloehn Headgear in Maxilliary Molar Anchorage. Thesis thesis, 1984. https://scholarsrepository.llu.edu/etd/1336