{"id":{"repo_id":"loma-linda","oai_identifier":"oai:scholarsrepository.llu.edu:etd-2109"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/loma-linda/oai:scholarsrepository.llu.edu:etd-2109","repository":{"repo_id":"loma-linda","name":"Loma Linda University","base_url":"https://scholarsrepository.llu.edu/do/oai/"},"display":{"title":"Evaluation of a Special Teaching Program with Ambulatory Cardiac Patients","abstract":"<p>This study was designed to test the hypotheses that ambulatory cardiac patients given a special teaching program would have increased understanding about their medication, make fewer medication errors, and know more about undesirable effects and how to handle them than patients not included in the special teaching program. Forty-one ambulatory cardiac patients were, after a random start, alternately assigned to an experimental or to a control group. All the patients were taking one or more of three different medications before hospitalization, during their hospital stay, and after their discharge. Three medications, digoxin (lanoxin), lasix, and nitroglycerin, were studied. The program for the experimental group included planned instruction and practice in self-administered medication while the patients were hospitalized.</p> <p>The program, planned by the investigator, was implemented by three hospital staff medicine nurses. The investigator administered the pretests before the program and the post-tests 8 to 15 days after the patients were discharged. She also made a tablet count as one way of identifying medication errors.</p> <p>Findings were in the direction supporting the hypotheses (no statistical procedures were performed). Pretest to post-test differences between the control and experimental groups were higher in most instances for the experimental group; i.e., , 7 of 9 questions on understanding of medication, 3 of 6 questions on medication errors, and 9 of 9 questions on knowledge of undesirable effects. The experimental group had no errors as determined by tablet count, whereas the control group had 23 out of a possible 31.</p> <p>The data suggest that the special teaching program was effective in helping cardiac patients comply with their medication regimen insofar as compliance can be measured.</p>","abstract_html":"&lt;p&gt;This study was designed to test the hypotheses that ambulatory cardiac patients given a special teaching program would have increased understanding about their medication, make fewer medication errors, and know more about undesirable effects and how to handle them than patients not included in the special teaching program. Forty-one ambulatory cardiac patients were, after a random start, alternately assigned to an experimental or to a control group. All the patients were taking one or more of three different medications before hospitalization, during their hospital stay, and after their discharge. Three medications, digoxin (lanoxin), lasix, and nitroglycerin, were studied. The program for the experimental group included planned instruction and practice in self-administered medication while the patients were hospitalized.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;The program, planned by the investigator, was implemented by three hospital staff medicine nurses. The investigator administered the pretests before the program and the post-tests 8 to 15 days after the patients were discharged. She also made a tablet count as one way of identifying medication errors.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Findings were in the direction supporting the hypotheses (no statistical procedures were performed). Pretest to post-test differences between the control and experimental groups were higher in most instances for the experimental group; i.e., , 7 of 9 questions on understanding of medication, 3 of 6 questions on medication errors, and 9 of 9 questions on knowledge of undesirable effects. The experimental group had no errors as determined by tablet count, whereas the control group had 23 out of a possible 31.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;The data suggest that the special teaching program was effective in helping cardiac patients comply with their medication regimen insofar as compliance can be measured.&lt;/p&gt;","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["McGregor Minns, Mary L."],"institution":null,"degree_name":"Master of Science (MS)","degree_level":"Thesis","degree_discipline":"Nursing","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Lucile Lewis","Matilda Annabelle Mills","Raymond Crawford"],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":1976,"date_issued":"1976-04-01T08:00:00Z","date_published":"1976-04-01T08:00:00Z","updated_at":"2026-07-24T02:53:37Z","subjects":["Cardiovascular Diseases","Nursing","Public Health Education and Promotion","Cardiovascular Diseases -- drug therapy; Patient Education"],"languages":["English"],"rights":["This title appears here courtesy of the author, who has granted Loma Linda University a limited, non-exclusive right to make this publication available to the public. The author retains all other copyrights."],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"https://scholarsrepository.llu.edu/etd/1328","outbound_label":"Repository record","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Lucile Lewis","Matilda Annabelle Mills","Raymond Crawford"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["McGregor Minns, Mary L."]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Nursing"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Thesis"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Master of Science (MS)"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Cardiovascular Diseases","Nursing","Public Health Education and Promotion","Cardiovascular Diseases -- drug therapy; Patient Education"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language","label":"Dc Language","values":["English"]},{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["This title appears here courtesy of the author, who has granted Loma Linda University a limited, non-exclusive right to make this publication available to the public. The author retains all other copyrights."]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["https://scholarsrepository.llu.edu/etd/1328"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["<p>This study was designed to test the hypotheses that ambulatory cardiac patients given a special teaching program would have increased understanding about their medication, make fewer medication errors, and know more about undesirable effects and how to handle them than patients not included in the special teaching program. Forty-one ambulatory cardiac patients were, after a random start, alternately assigned to an experimental or to a control group. All the patients were taking one or more of three different medications before hospitalization, during their hospital stay, and after their discharge. Three medications, digoxin (lanoxin), lasix, and nitroglycerin, were studied. The program for the experimental group included planned instruction and practice in self-administered medication while the patients were hospitalized.</p> <p>The program, planned by the investigator, was implemented by three hospital staff medicine nurses. The investigator administered the pretests before the program and the post-tests 8 to 15 days after the patients were discharged. She also made a tablet count as one way of identifying medication errors.</p> <p>Findings were in the direction supporting the hypotheses (no statistical procedures were performed). Pretest to post-test differences between the control and experimental groups were higher in most instances for the experimental group; i.e., , 7 of 9 questions on understanding of medication, 3 of 6 questions on medication errors, and 9 of 9 questions on knowledge of undesirable effects. The experimental group had no errors as determined by tablet count, whereas the control group had 23 out of a possible 31.</p> <p>The data suggest that the special teaching program was effective in helping cardiac patients comply with their medication regimen insofar as compliance can be measured.</p>"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Evaluation of a Special Teaching Program with Ambulatory Cardiac Patients"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Lucile Lewis","Matilda Annabelle Mills","Raymond Crawford"],"dc:creator":["McGregor Minns, Mary L."],"dc:description.abstract":["<p>This study was designed to test the hypotheses that ambulatory cardiac patients given a special teaching program would have increased understanding about their medication, make fewer medication errors, and know more about undesirable effects and how to handle them than patients not included in the special teaching program. Forty-one ambulatory cardiac patients were, after a random start, alternately assigned to an experimental or to a control group. All the patients were taking one or more of three different medications before hospitalization, during their hospital stay, and after their discharge. Three medications, digoxin (lanoxin), lasix, and nitroglycerin, were studied. The program for the experimental group included planned instruction and practice in self-administered medication while the patients were hospitalized.</p> <p>The program, planned by the investigator, was implemented by three hospital staff medicine nurses. The investigator administered the pretests before the program and the post-tests 8 to 15 days after the patients were discharged. She also made a tablet count as one way of identifying medication errors.</p> <p>Findings were in the direction supporting the hypotheses (no statistical procedures were performed). Pretest to post-test differences between the control and experimental groups were higher in most instances for the experimental group; i.e., , 7 of 9 questions on understanding of medication, 3 of 6 questions on medication errors, and 9 of 9 questions on knowledge of undesirable effects. The experimental group had no errors as determined by tablet count, whereas the control group had 23 out of a possible 31.</p> <p>The data suggest that the special teaching program was effective in helping cardiac patients comply with their medication regimen insofar as compliance can be measured.</p>"],"dc:identifier":["https://scholarsrepository.llu.edu/etd/1328"],"dc:language":["English"],"dc:rights":["This title appears here courtesy of the author, who has granted Loma Linda University a limited, non-exclusive right to make this publication available to the public. The author retains all other copyrights."],"dc:subject":["Cardiovascular Diseases","Nursing","Public Health Education and Promotion","Cardiovascular Diseases -- drug therapy; Patient Education"],"dc:title":["Evaluation of a Special Teaching Program with Ambulatory Cardiac Patients"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Nursing"],"thesis:degree_level":["Thesis"],"thesis:degree_name":["Master of Science (MS)"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-24T02:53:37Z"}