{"id":{"repo_id":"liverpool-jm","oai_identifier":"oai:researchonline.ljmu.ac.uk:4478"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/liverpool-jm/oai:researchonline.ljmu.ac.uk:4478","repository":{"repo_id":"liverpool-jm","name":"Liverpool Jon Moores University","base_url":"https://researchonline.ljmu.ac.uk/cgi/oai2"},"display":{"title":"Probation, Politics, Policy and Practice: From New Labour to the Coalition government","abstract":"The outputs presented in part submission of a PhD by publication represent the body of my published work over the past ten years. They cover policy, practice and legislative developments during both the New Labour and Coalition Governments that have ultimately led to the demise of the Probation Service as a unified public sector organisation. Two main themes are evident in my writing. The first is a critique of how an ideological commitment to economic neo-liberalism and accompanying social conservatism has shaped contemporary probation policy and public sector provision more generally. The second significant strand has been an exploration of the impact of these developments on the occupational culture and working practices of probation work.","abstract_html":"The outputs presented in part submission of a PhD by publication represent the body of my published work over the past ten years. They cover policy, practice and legislative developments during both the New Labour and Coalition Governments that have ultimately led to the demise of the Probation Service as a unified public sector organisation. Two main themes are evident in my writing. The first is a critique of how an ideological commitment to economic neo-liberalism and accompanying social conservatism has shaped contemporary probation policy and public sector provision more generally. The second significant strand has been an exploration of the impact of these developments on the occupational culture and working practices of probation work.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Burke, L"],"institution":"Liverpool John Moores University","degree_name":"phd_by_publication","degree_level":"doctoral","degree_discipline":null,"degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":[],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2016,"date_issued":"2016","date_published":"2016","updated_at":"2026-07-24T06:30:00Z","subjects":["JN101 Great Britain","HV8301 Penology. Prisons. Corrections"],"languages":[],"rights":[],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"https://doi.org/10.24377/LJMU.t.00004478","outbound_label":"DOI","outbound_source":"dc:identifier.doi"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Burke, L"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date","label":"Dc Date","values":["2016"]},{"key":"dc:date.issued","label":"Date","values":["2016"]},{"key":"dc:publisher.department","label":"Dc Publisher Department","values":["Law and Justice Studies","Faculty of Arts, Professional & Social Studies"]},{"key":"dc:publisher.institution","label":"Dc Publisher Institution","values":["Liverpool John Moores University"]},{"key":"dc:relation.isreferencedby","label":"Dc Relation Isreferencedby","values":["https://researchonline.ljmu.ac.uk/id/eprint/4478/"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["Thesis"]},{"key":"dc:type.qualificationlevel","label":"Dc Type Qualificationlevel","values":["doctoral"]},{"key":"dc:type.qualificationname","label":"Dc Type Qualificationname","values":["phd_by_publication"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["JN101 Great Britain","HV8301 Penology. Prisons. Corrections"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier.doi","label":"DOI","values":["10.24377/LJMU.t.00004478"]},{"key":"dc:identifier.uri","label":"Identifier URI","values":["https://researchonline.ljmu.ac.uk/id/eprint/4478/1/158285_Critical%20commentary%20and%20publications.pdf","https://researchonline.ljmu.ac.uk/id/eprint/4478/2/158284_lol%20burke%20cv.pdf"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["The outputs presented in part submission of a PhD by publication represent the body of my published work over the past ten years. They cover policy, practice and legislative developments during both the New Labour and Coalition Governments that have ultimately led to the demise of the Probation Service as a unified public sector organisation. Two main themes are evident in my writing. The first is a critique of how an ideological commitment to economic neo-liberalism and accompanying social conservatism has shaped contemporary probation policy and public sector provision more generally. The second significant strand has been an exploration of the impact of these developments on the occupational culture and working practices of probation work."]},{"key":"dc:format","label":"Dc Format","values":["text"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Probation, Politics, Policy and Practice: From New Labour to the Coalition government"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:creator":["Burke, L"],"dc:date":["2016"],"dc:date.issued":["2016"],"dc:description.abstract":["The outputs presented in part submission of a PhD by publication represent the body of my published work over the past ten years. They cover policy, practice and legislative developments during both the New Labour and Coalition Governments that have ultimately led to the demise of the Probation Service as a unified public sector organisation. Two main themes are evident in my writing. The first is a critique of how an ideological commitment to economic neo-liberalism and accompanying social conservatism has shaped contemporary probation policy and public sector provision more generally. The second significant strand has been an exploration of the impact of these developments on the occupational culture and working practices of probation work."],"dc:format":["text"],"dc:identifier.doi":["10.24377/LJMU.t.00004478"],"dc:identifier.uri":["https://researchonline.ljmu.ac.uk/id/eprint/4478/1/158285_Critical%20commentary%20and%20publications.pdf","https://researchonline.ljmu.ac.uk/id/eprint/4478/2/158284_lol%20burke%20cv.pdf"],"dc:publisher.department":["Law and Justice Studies","Faculty of Arts, Professional & Social Studies"],"dc:publisher.institution":["Liverpool John Moores University"],"dc:relation.isreferencedby":["https://researchonline.ljmu.ac.uk/id/eprint/4478/"],"dc:subject":["JN101 Great Britain","HV8301 Penology. Prisons. Corrections"],"dc:title":["Probation, Politics, Policy and Practice: From New Labour to the Coalition government"],"dc:type":["Thesis"],"dc:type.qualificationlevel":["doctoral"],"dc:type.qualificationname":["phd_by_publication"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-24T06:30:00Z"}