Capital regulation and bank behavior: Empirical evidence from Asia : A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at Lincoln University
type: CreativeWork
description: Capital regulation is one of regulators’ primary focus in assessing and controlling bank operations. Bank capital represents the shareholders’ benefits and induces them to manage risk properly. This effect is of great significance due to banks’ interconnectedness that quickly spreads the failure of a specific institution over the whole system. In addition, when losses occur, bank capital acts as the first absorber of loss and reduces the probability of bankruptcy. This can eventually reduce the likelihood and amount of any government bailouts, as well as a tax burden on citizens. However, given the high costs associated with capital, banks prefer to keep lower levels of capital. This study considers the effects of capital regulation on bank behavior. More specifically, it investigates bank responses to capital regulation to determine whether it encourages banks to operate safely or not. This study focuses on Asian banks, which have received limited scholarly attention, compared to the U.S and European countries. Given more convergence in implementing Basel III (international capital standards) among Asian countries, understanding the effects of capital regulation on bank behavior in these countries is of great importance. Firstly, we examine how capital regulation affects bank capital ratios by adopting the Partial Adjustment Model and employing two-step system Generalized Method of Moments (GMM) regression. Our study confirms that, during the study period (from 2001 to 2016), capital regulation is effective in inducing banks to raise their capital ratios (regardless of different measurements). Secondly, we investigate the effects of capital regulation on bank capital and risk behavior using a Simultaneous Equation Model with Partial Adjustment. The emphasis is on the existence of fixed effects, which are commonly ignored in prior studies. The results show that capital regulation exerts a negative effect on capital adjustments and has no effect on bank risk. Instead…
abstract: Capital regulation is one of regulators’ primary focus in assessing and controlling bank operations. Bank capital represents the shareholders’ benefits and induces them to manage risk properly. This effect is of great significance due to banks’ interconnectedness that quickly spreads the failure of a specific institution over the whole system. In addition, when losses occur, bank capital acts as the first absorber of loss and reduces the probability of bankruptcy. This can eventually reduce the likelihood and amount of any government bailouts, as well as a tax burden on citizens. However, given the high costs associated with capital, banks prefer to keep lower levels of capital. This study considers the effects of capital regulation on bank behavior. More specifically, it investigates bank responses to capital regulation to determine whether it encourages banks to operate safely or not. This study focuses on Asian banks, which have received limited scholarly attention, compared to the U.S and European countries. Given more convergence in implementing Basel III (international capital standards) among Asian countries, understanding the effects of capital regulation on bank behavior in these countries is of great importance. Firstly, we examine how capital regulation affects bank capital ratios by adopting the Partial Adjustment Model and employing two-step system Generalized Method of Moments (GMM) regression. Our study confirms that, during the study period (from 2001 to 2016), capital regulation is effective in inducing banks to raise their capital ratios (regardless of different measurements). Secondly, we investigate the effects of capital regulation on bank capital and risk behavior using a Simultaneous Equation Model with Partial Adjustment. The emphasis is on the existence of fixed effects, which are commonly ignored in prior studies. The results show that capital regulation exerts a negative effect on capital adjustments and has no effect on bank risk. Instead…
author: Nguyen, Thi Thieu Quang
language: en
keywords: Asia, Basel III, bank risk-taking, bank behaviour, balance sheet adjustment, capital structure, capital regulation, dynamic panel data, endogeneity, partial adjustment model, system GMM, simultaneous equations model, banking industry, ANZSRC::1502 Banking, Finance and Investment
license: https://researcharchive.lincoln.ac.nz/pages/rights
date published: 2018
date modified: 2026-07-24T02:50:54Z
provider: Lincoln University
publisher: Networked Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations
type: WebPage
source organization: Lincoln University

PropertyValue
property ID: Handle
value: https://hdl.handle.net/10182/10659