Back to results

University of Lethbridge

Addiction, treatment, and evidence-based medicine

Abstract

How addiction is conceived has important practical implications for how addicts are to be treated. This paper argues that we have a horrible concept of addiction and that has led to horrible treatment results. Examining this concept’s history will show that its main components (especially the brain disease view and the loss of control hypotheses) were invented or assumed by social reformers about 200 years ago, and that they do not map onto the physical world in a rich and systematic fashion. Science has been used to promote these assumptions instead of ever substantively establishing them. There are treatment methods that have been shown to be effective, but these are rarely employed in standard practice. Instead, addicts are provided with interventions that have been shown to be ineffective. Continuing to offer addicts treatment modalities that do not work when there are interventions with proven efficacy, is medical malpractice.

Author and committee

dc:creator, dc:contributor.*
Authors
  • Wilcox, Sean
  • University of Lethbridge. Faculty of Arts and Science

Subjects

dc:subject × 5

Identifiers

dc:identifier.*
Identifier
hdl:10133/4600
OAI identifier oai:identifier
oai:opus.uleth.ca:10133/4600

Chain of custody

source
Harvested from
University of Lethbridge
Base URL
opus.uleth.ca/server/oai/request
Last updated
2026-07-27
Source record
OAI-PMH GetRecord
citation

Wilcox, Sean; University of Lethbridge. Faculty of Arts and Science. Addiction, treatment, and evidence-based medicine. 2016.