Back to results

University of Lethbridge

An Early history of the 'By the Court' decisions on the Supreme Court of Canada

Abstract

The Supreme Court of Canada has developed a practice of releasing some of the most important constitutional decisions as anonymous, which disregards a long standing judicial tradition of acknowledging which judge authored the opinion. Judgments that fit this style have been coined the ‘By the Court” decisions. Supreme Court scholars have recognized this practice, but there has been no scholarship dedicated to explaining its emergence. It is widely accepted that this practice emerged on the Supreme Court on our modern court in the 1970s, and it was a borrowed practice from a neighboring country. This thesis uses empirical evidence to demonstrate that the Supreme Court has used the By the Court style for nearly a century before the 1970s. It argues that this practice has organically grown through the Supreme Court of Canada’s own functioning, and identifies critical junctures to explain its evolution.

Author and committee

dc:creator, dc:contributor.*
Authors
  • Zanoni, Marc
  • University of Lethbridge. Faculty of Arts and Science

Subjects

dc:subject × 4

Identifiers

dc:identifier.*
Identifier
hdl:10133/4421
OAI identifier oai:identifier
oai:opus.uleth.ca:10133/4421

Chain of custody

source
Harvested from
University of Lethbridge
Base URL
opus.uleth.ca/server/oai/request
Last updated
2026-07-27
Source record
OAI-PMH GetRecord
citation

Zanoni, Marc; University of Lethbridge. Faculty of Arts and Science. An Early history of the 'By the Court' decisions on the Supreme Court of Canada. 2015.