{"id":{"repo_id":"ku","oai_identifier":"oai:kuscholarworks.ku.edu:1808/7424"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/ku/oai:kuscholarworks.ku.edu:1808/7424","repository":{"repo_id":"ku","name":"University of Kansas","base_url":"https://kuscholarworks.ku.edu/server/oai/request"},"display":{"title":"Sacrosanct Values, Controversial Artistic Expression, and Today's Global Society: A Dramatistic Analysis of the Muhammad Cartoon Controversy","abstract":"This study is an exploration into how the Muhammad Cartoon Controversy unfolded at three critical thresholds of the conflict's development vis-à-vis a comprehensive examination of the scope of the phenomenon. First, this study focuses a lens on critical communications that transpired in Denmark among key figures engaged in the conflict. Second, the interviews of Flemming Rose provide insight into how the conflict was dramatized by Jyllands-Posten and Flemming Rose for international dissemination. Third, the televised broadcasts provide examples of how the controversy was dramatized for American audiences. Together, these rhetorical artifacts allow for analysis of the product of the worldviews as expressed through the cartoons, multiplied by the values and traditions of the interlocutors, and multiplied by the amplification of the conflict through televised broadcasts. The ultimate purpose of this study is to determine what lessons learned can be applied to ameliorate future international conflicts involving disparate value systems.","abstract_html":"This study is an exploration into how the Muhammad Cartoon Controversy unfolded at three critical thresholds of the conflict's development vis-à-vis a comprehensive examination of the scope of the phenomenon. First, this study focuses a lens on critical communications that transpired in Denmark among key figures engaged in the conflict. Second, the interviews of Flemming Rose provide insight into how the conflict was dramatized by Jyllands-Posten and Flemming Rose for international dissemination. Third, the televised broadcasts provide examples of how the controversy was dramatized for American audiences. Together, these rhetorical artifacts allow for analysis of the product of the worldviews as expressed through the cartoons, multiplied by the values and traditions of the interlocutors, and multiplied by the amplification of the conflict through televised broadcasts. The ultimate purpose of this study is to determine what lessons learned can be applied to ameliorate future international conflicts involving disparate value systems.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Hall, Zeta C."],"institution":"University of Kansas","degree_name":null,"degree_level":null,"degree_discipline":null,"degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":[],"advisors":["Carlin, Diana B."],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2009,"date_issued":"2009-01-25","date_published":"2009-01-25","updated_at":"2026-07-24T02:46:52Z","subjects":["Language","Rhetoric and composition","Journalism","Mass communication","Art conflict","Freedom of speech","Muhammad cartoons","Rhetoric","Sacrosanct values","The sacred and the profane","Gillerra, Zeta Coneta-Tzipora","Hall, Zeta C."],"languages":["EN"],"rights":["This item is protected by copyright and unless otherwise specified the copyright of this thesis/dissertation is held by the author."],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier.other","label":"Dc Identifier Other","values":["http://dissertations.umi.com/ku:10134"],"render_values":[{"text":"http://dissertations.umi.com/ku:10134","href":"http://dissertations.umi.com/ku:10134","code":true}]}]},"links":{"outbound_url":"http://hdl.handle.net/1808/7424","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier.uri"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor.advisor","label":"Advisor","values":["Carlin, Diana B."]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Hall, Zeta C."]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date.accessioned","label":"Dc Date Accessioned","values":["2011-04-26T03:03:13Z"]},{"key":"dc:date.available","label":"Dc Date Available","values":["2011-04-26T03:03:13Z"]},{"key":"dc:date.issued","label":"Date","values":["2009-01-25"]},{"key":"dc:publisher","label":"Institution","values":["University of Kansas"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["Dissertation"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Language","Rhetoric and composition","Journalism","Mass communication","Art conflict","Freedom of speech","Muhammad cartoons","Rhetoric","Sacrosanct values","The sacred and the profane","Gillerra, Zeta Coneta-Tzipora","Hall, Zeta C."]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language.iso","label":"Language (ISO)","values":["EN"]},{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["This item is protected by copyright and unless otherwise specified the copyright of this thesis/dissertation is held by the author."]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier.other","label":"Dc Identifier Other","values":["http://dissertations.umi.com/ku:10134"]},{"key":"dc:identifier.uri","label":"Identifier URI","values":["http://hdl.handle.net/1808/7424"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description","label":"Description","values":["The author is now Zeta Coneta-Tzipora Gillerra."]},{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["This study is an exploration into how the Muhammad Cartoon Controversy unfolded at three critical thresholds of the conflict's development vis-à-vis a comprehensive examination of the scope of the phenomenon. First, this study focuses a lens on critical communications that transpired in Denmark among key figures engaged in the conflict. Second, the interviews of Flemming Rose provide insight into how the conflict was dramatized by Jyllands-Posten and Flemming Rose for international dissemination. Third, the televised broadcasts provide examples of how the controversy was dramatized for American audiences. Together, these rhetorical artifacts allow for analysis of the product of the worldviews as expressed through the cartoons, multiplied by the values and traditions of the interlocutors, and multiplied by the amplification of the conflict through televised broadcasts. The ultimate purpose of this study is to determine what lessons learned can be applied to ameliorate future international conflicts involving disparate value systems."]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Sacrosanct Values, Controversial Artistic Expression, and Today's Global Society: A Dramatistic Analysis of the Muhammad Cartoon Controversy"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor.advisor":["Carlin, Diana B."],"dc:creator":["Hall, Zeta C."],"dc:date.accessioned":["2011-04-26T03:03:13Z"],"dc:date.available":["2011-04-26T03:03:13Z"],"dc:date.issued":["2009-01-25"],"dc:description":["The author is now Zeta Coneta-Tzipora Gillerra."],"dc:description.abstract":["This study is an exploration into how the Muhammad Cartoon Controversy unfolded at three critical thresholds of the conflict's development vis-à-vis a comprehensive examination of the scope of the phenomenon. First, this study focuses a lens on critical communications that transpired in Denmark among key figures engaged in the conflict. Second, the interviews of Flemming Rose provide insight into how the conflict was dramatized by Jyllands-Posten and Flemming Rose for international dissemination. Third, the televised broadcasts provide examples of how the controversy was dramatized for American audiences. Together, these rhetorical artifacts allow for analysis of the product of the worldviews as expressed through the cartoons, multiplied by the values and traditions of the interlocutors, and multiplied by the amplification of the conflict through televised broadcasts. The ultimate purpose of this study is to determine what lessons learned can be applied to ameliorate future international conflicts involving disparate value systems."],"dc:identifier.other":["http://dissertations.umi.com/ku:10134"],"dc:identifier.uri":["http://hdl.handle.net/1808/7424"],"dc:language.iso":["EN"],"dc:publisher":["University of Kansas"],"dc:rights":["This item is protected by copyright and unless otherwise specified the copyright of this thesis/dissertation is held by the author."],"dc:subject":["Language","Rhetoric and composition","Journalism","Mass communication","Art conflict","Freedom of speech","Muhammad cartoons","Rhetoric","Sacrosanct values","The sacred and the profane","Gillerra, Zeta Coneta-Tzipora","Hall, Zeta C."],"dc:title":["Sacrosanct Values, Controversial Artistic Expression, and Today's Global Society: A Dramatistic Analysis of the Muhammad Cartoon Controversy"],"dc:type":["Dissertation"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-24T02:46:52Z"}