{"id":{"repo_id":"ku","oai_identifier":"oai:kuscholarworks.ku.edu:1808/38731"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/ku/oai:kuscholarworks.ku.edu:1808/38731","repository":{"repo_id":"ku","name":"University of Kansas","base_url":"https://kuscholarworks.ku.edu/server/oai/request"},"display":{"title":"Reassessing the Power of One Reinforcer with an Evaluation of Learning Histories","abstract":"Best practices for shaping procedures have yet to be established. Previous research has evaluated the impact of a single conditioned reinforcer delivered for a non-target behavior during shaping following a period of time without reinforcement (Hunter & Rosales-Ruiz, 2019). Findings suggested that the non-target behavior consequated with the conditioned reinforcer persisted into a 1-min extinction phase at similar or greater levels than behaviors that had been repeatedly reinforced. Persistence of a non-target response may be due to the acquired learning history of participants. This study sought to replicate the findings of Hunter and Rosales-Ruiz and further evaluate the role of the experimental learning history in the persistence of the non-target behavior. Major findings of the initial study were replicated. The present research also found evidence that the conditioned reinforcers may have acquired discriminative properties as a result of the experimental history such that they induced continued responding after a single delivery.","abstract_html":"Best practices for shaping procedures have yet to be established. Previous research has evaluated the impact of a single conditioned reinforcer delivered for a non-target behavior during shaping following a period of time without reinforcement (Hunter & Rosales-Ruiz, 2019). Findings suggested that the non-target behavior consequated with the conditioned reinforcer persisted into a 1-min extinction phase at similar or greater levels than behaviors that had been repeatedly reinforced. Persistence of a non-target response may be due to the acquired learning history of participants. This study sought to replicate the findings of Hunter and Rosales-Ruiz and further evaluate the role of the experimental learning history in the persistence of the non-target behavior. Major findings of the initial study were replicated. The present research also found evidence that the conditioned reinforcers may have acquired discriminative properties as a result of the experimental history such that they induced continued responding after a single delivery.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Messiah, Emily L"],"institution":"University of Kansas","degree_name":null,"degree_level":null,"degree_discipline":null,"degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":[],"advisors":["Kuhn, Robin M"],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2023,"date_issued":"2023-12-31","date_published":"2023-12-31","updated_at":"2026-07-24T02:46:05Z","subjects":["Behavioral sciences","history effects","reinforcer","shaping"],"languages":["en"],"rights":["Copyright held by the author."],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier.other","label":"Dc Identifier Other","values":["http://dissertations.umi.com/ku:19257"],"render_values":[{"text":"http://dissertations.umi.com/ku:19257","href":"http://dissertations.umi.com/ku:19257","code":true}]}]},"links":{"outbound_url":"https://hdl.handle.net/1808/38731","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier.uri"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor.advisor","label":"Advisor","values":["Kuhn, Robin M"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Messiah, Emily L"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date.accessioned","label":"Dc Date Accessioned","values":["2026-04-24T16:39:20Z"]},{"key":"dc:date.available","label":"Dc Date Available","values":["2026-04-24T16:39:20Z"]},{"key":"dc:date.issued","label":"Date","values":["2023-12-31"]},{"key":"dc:publisher","label":"Institution","values":["University of Kansas"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["Thesis"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Behavioral sciences","history effects","reinforcer","shaping"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language.iso","label":"Language (ISO)","values":["en"]},{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["Copyright held by the author."]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier.other","label":"Dc Identifier Other","values":["http://dissertations.umi.com/ku:19257"]},{"key":"dc:identifier.uri","label":"Identifier URI","values":["https://hdl.handle.net/1808/38731"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["Best practices for shaping procedures have yet to be established. Previous research has evaluated the impact of a single conditioned reinforcer delivered for a non-target behavior during shaping following a period of time without reinforcement (Hunter & Rosales-Ruiz, 2019). Findings suggested that the non-target behavior consequated with the conditioned reinforcer persisted into a 1-min extinction phase at similar or greater levels than behaviors that had been repeatedly reinforced. Persistence of a non-target response may be due to the acquired learning history of participants. This study sought to replicate the findings of Hunter and Rosales-Ruiz and further evaluate the role of the experimental learning history in the persistence of the non-target behavior. Major findings of the initial study were replicated. The present research also found evidence that the conditioned reinforcers may have acquired discriminative properties as a result of the experimental history such that they induced continued responding after a single delivery."]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Reassessing the Power of One Reinforcer with an Evaluation of Learning Histories"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor.advisor":["Kuhn, Robin M"],"dc:creator":["Messiah, Emily L"],"dc:date.accessioned":["2026-04-24T16:39:20Z"],"dc:date.available":["2026-04-24T16:39:20Z"],"dc:date.issued":["2023-12-31"],"dc:description.abstract":["Best practices for shaping procedures have yet to be established. Previous research has evaluated the impact of a single conditioned reinforcer delivered for a non-target behavior during shaping following a period of time without reinforcement (Hunter & Rosales-Ruiz, 2019). Findings suggested that the non-target behavior consequated with the conditioned reinforcer persisted into a 1-min extinction phase at similar or greater levels than behaviors that had been repeatedly reinforced. Persistence of a non-target response may be due to the acquired learning history of participants. This study sought to replicate the findings of Hunter and Rosales-Ruiz and further evaluate the role of the experimental learning history in the persistence of the non-target behavior. Major findings of the initial study were replicated. The present research also found evidence that the conditioned reinforcers may have acquired discriminative properties as a result of the experimental history such that they induced continued responding after a single delivery."],"dc:identifier.other":["http://dissertations.umi.com/ku:19257"],"dc:identifier.uri":["https://hdl.handle.net/1808/38731"],"dc:language.iso":["en"],"dc:publisher":["University of Kansas"],"dc:rights":["Copyright held by the author."],"dc:subject":["Behavioral sciences","history effects","reinforcer","shaping"],"dc:title":["Reassessing the Power of One Reinforcer with an Evaluation of Learning Histories"],"dc:type":["Thesis"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-24T02:46:05Z"}