{"id":{"repo_id":"ku","oai_identifier":"oai:kuscholarworks.ku.edu:1808/37140"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/ku/oai:kuscholarworks.ku.edu:1808/37140","repository":{"repo_id":"ku","name":"University of Kansas","base_url":"https://kuscholarworks.ku.edu/server/oai/request"},"display":{"title":"Spillover Effects in Board Structure: Evidence from SB 826","abstract":"Peer effects have been found to exist in a variety of contexts, but it is uncertain whether an exogenous shock to board governance structure of a subset of firms can affect the governance structure of peer firms. I test this proposition in a board structure setting using the swift and unexpected passage of California law SB 826, which mandated that all publicly traded California-headquartered firms have at least one female director by the end of 2019. I predict and find a significant increase in the likelihood of new female director appointments for non-California peer firms following the passage of SB 826. Further, and consistent with theory, the likelihood of a new female appointment is significantly stronger for peer firms that are more closely connected to California firms. My results not only speak to the demand for gender diversity in governance practices but also provide novel empirical evidence that a shock to the board governance structure of a subset of firms can spillover to other peer firms.","abstract_html":"Peer effects have been found to exist in a variety of contexts, but it is uncertain whether an exogenous shock to board governance structure of a subset of firms can affect the governance structure of peer firms. I test this proposition in a board structure setting using the swift and unexpected passage of California law SB 826, which mandated that all publicly traded California-headquartered firms have at least one female director by the end of 2019. I predict and find a significant increase in the likelihood of new female director appointments for non-California peer firms following the passage of SB 826. Further, and consistent with theory, the likelihood of a new female appointment is significantly stronger for peer firms that are more closely connected to California firms. My results not only speak to the demand for gender diversity in governance practices but also provide novel empirical evidence that a shock to the board governance structure of a subset of firms can spillover to other peer firms.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Yazzie, Courtney Elaine"],"institution":"University of Kansas","degree_name":null,"degree_level":null,"degree_discipline":null,"degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":[],"advisors":["Kubick, Thomas","Jones, Keith"],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2022,"date_issued":"2022-05-31","date_published":"2022-05-31","updated_at":"2026-07-24T02:46:40Z","subjects":["Accounting","board structure","female","gender diversity","governance","peer effects","SB 826"],"languages":["en"],"rights":["Copyright held by the author."],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier.other","label":"Dc Identifier Other","values":["http://dissertations.umi.com/ku:18244"],"render_values":[{"text":"http://dissertations.umi.com/ku:18244","href":"http://dissertations.umi.com/ku:18244","code":true}]}]},"links":{"outbound_url":"https://hdl.handle.net/1808/37140","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier.uri"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor.advisor","label":"Advisor","values":["Kubick, Thomas","Jones, Keith"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Yazzie, Courtney Elaine"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date.accessioned","label":"Dc Date Accessioned","values":["2026-04-13T21:26:50Z"]},{"key":"dc:date.available","label":"Dc Date Available","values":["2026-04-13T21:26:50Z"]},{"key":"dc:date.issued","label":"Date","values":["2022-05-31"]},{"key":"dc:publisher","label":"Institution","values":["University of Kansas"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["Dissertation"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Accounting","board structure","female","gender diversity","governance","peer effects","SB 826"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language.iso","label":"Language (ISO)","values":["en"]},{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["Copyright held by the author."]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier.other","label":"Dc Identifier Other","values":["http://dissertations.umi.com/ku:18244"]},{"key":"dc:identifier.uri","label":"Identifier URI","values":["https://hdl.handle.net/1808/37140"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["Peer effects have been found to exist in a variety of contexts, but it is uncertain whether an exogenous shock to board governance structure of a subset of firms can affect the governance structure of peer firms. I test this proposition in a board structure setting using the swift and unexpected passage of California law SB 826, which mandated that all publicly traded California-headquartered firms have at least one female director by the end of 2019. I predict and find a significant increase in the likelihood of new female director appointments for non-California peer firms following the passage of SB 826. Further, and consistent with theory, the likelihood of a new female appointment is significantly stronger for peer firms that are more closely connected to California firms. My results not only speak to the demand for gender diversity in governance practices but also provide novel empirical evidence that a shock to the board governance structure of a subset of firms can spillover to other peer firms."]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Spillover Effects in Board Structure: Evidence from SB 826"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor.advisor":["Kubick, Thomas","Jones, Keith"],"dc:creator":["Yazzie, Courtney Elaine"],"dc:date.accessioned":["2026-04-13T21:26:50Z"],"dc:date.available":["2026-04-13T21:26:50Z"],"dc:date.issued":["2022-05-31"],"dc:description.abstract":["Peer effects have been found to exist in a variety of contexts, but it is uncertain whether an exogenous shock to board governance structure of a subset of firms can affect the governance structure of peer firms. I test this proposition in a board structure setting using the swift and unexpected passage of California law SB 826, which mandated that all publicly traded California-headquartered firms have at least one female director by the end of 2019. I predict and find a significant increase in the likelihood of new female director appointments for non-California peer firms following the passage of SB 826. Further, and consistent with theory, the likelihood of a new female appointment is significantly stronger for peer firms that are more closely connected to California firms. My results not only speak to the demand for gender diversity in governance practices but also provide novel empirical evidence that a shock to the board governance structure of a subset of firms can spillover to other peer firms."],"dc:identifier.other":["http://dissertations.umi.com/ku:18244"],"dc:identifier.uri":["https://hdl.handle.net/1808/37140"],"dc:language.iso":["en"],"dc:publisher":["University of Kansas"],"dc:rights":["Copyright held by the author."],"dc:subject":["Accounting","board structure","female","gender diversity","governance","peer effects","SB 826"],"dc:title":["Spillover Effects in Board Structure: Evidence from SB 826"],"dc:type":["Dissertation"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-24T02:46:40Z"}