{"id":{"repo_id":"ku","oai_identifier":"oai:kuscholarworks.ku.edu:1808/30075"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/ku/oai:kuscholarworks.ku.edu:1808/30075","repository":{"repo_id":"ku","name":"University of Kansas","base_url":"https://kuscholarworks.ku.edu/server/oai/request"},"display":{"title":"The test-retest reliability of the Western Aphasia Battery-Revised","abstract":"The purpose of the study was to examine the test-retest reliability of the Western Aphasia Battery-Revised (WAB-R). Ten people with stroke-induced aphasia were administered the entire WAB-R twice. Correlation coefficients were .80 for 11/13 WAB-R sections/subtests. Paired t-tests revealed no significant difference between the means at Time 1 and Time 2 for any of the 13 WAB-R sections/subtests. Effect size was less than small for 11/13 WAB-R sections/subtests and small for two subtests. For 8/13 sections/subtests, one WAB-R standard error of measurement (SEM) represented less than 5% of the total number of points possible; thus, 68% of the time, persons with aphasia would be expected to score within 5% of the total number of points possible on repeated testing. For 5/13 sections/subtests, one WAB-R SEM represented more than 5% but less than 10% of the total number of points possible.","abstract_html":"The purpose of the study was to examine the test-retest reliability of the Western Aphasia Battery-Revised (WAB-R). Ten people with stroke-induced aphasia were administered the entire WAB-R twice. Correlation coefficients were .80 for 11/13 WAB-R sections/subtests. Paired t-tests revealed no significant difference between the means at Time 1 and Time 2 for any of the 13 WAB-R sections/subtests. Effect size was less than small for 11/13 WAB-R sections/subtests and small for two subtests. For 8/13 sections/subtests, one WAB-R standard error of measurement (SEM) represented less than 5% of the total number of points possible; thus, 68% of the time, persons with aphasia would be expected to score within 5% of the total number of points possible on repeated testing. For 5/13 sections/subtests, one WAB-R SEM represented more than 5% but less than 10% of the total number of points possible.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Bond, Brandall"],"institution":"University of Kansas","degree_name":null,"degree_level":null,"degree_discipline":null,"degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":[],"advisors":["Jackson, Susan T","Mumy, Ana Paula"],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2019,"date_issued":"2019-05-31","date_published":"2019-05-31","updated_at":"2026-07-24T02:45:31Z","subjects":["Speech therapy","Language","aphasia","assessment","score stability","test-retest reliability","Western Aphasia Battery-Revised"],"languages":["en"],"rights":["Copyright held by the author."],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier.other","label":"Dc Identifier Other","values":["http://dissertations.umi.com/ku:16541"],"render_values":[{"text":"http://dissertations.umi.com/ku:16541","href":"http://dissertations.umi.com/ku:16541","code":true}]}]},"links":{"outbound_url":"http://hdl.handle.net/1808/30075","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier.uri"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor.advisor","label":"Advisor","values":["Jackson, Susan T","Mumy, Ana Paula"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Bond, Brandall"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date.accessioned","label":"Dc Date Accessioned","values":["2020-03-16T20:40:04Z"]},{"key":"dc:date.available","label":"Dc Date Available","values":["2020-03-16T20:40:04Z"]},{"key":"dc:date.issued","label":"Date","values":["2019-05-31"]},{"key":"dc:publisher","label":"Institution","values":["University of Kansas"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["Thesis"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Speech therapy","Language","aphasia","assessment","score stability","test-retest reliability","Western Aphasia Battery-Revised"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language.iso","label":"Language (ISO)","values":["en"]},{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["Copyright held by the author."]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier.other","label":"Dc Identifier Other","values":["http://dissertations.umi.com/ku:16541"]},{"key":"dc:identifier.uri","label":"Identifier URI","values":["http://hdl.handle.net/1808/30075"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["The purpose of the study was to examine the test-retest reliability of the Western Aphasia Battery-Revised (WAB-R). Ten people with stroke-induced aphasia were administered the entire WAB-R twice. Correlation coefficients were .80 for 11/13 WAB-R sections/subtests. Paired t-tests revealed no significant difference between the means at Time 1 and Time 2 for any of the 13 WAB-R sections/subtests. Effect size was less than small for 11/13 WAB-R sections/subtests and small for two subtests. For 8/13 sections/subtests, one WAB-R standard error of measurement (SEM) represented less than 5% of the total number of points possible; thus, 68% of the time, persons with aphasia would be expected to score within 5% of the total number of points possible on repeated testing. For 5/13 sections/subtests, one WAB-R SEM represented more than 5% but less than 10% of the total number of points possible."]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["The test-retest reliability of the Western Aphasia Battery-Revised"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor.advisor":["Jackson, Susan T","Mumy, Ana Paula"],"dc:creator":["Bond, Brandall"],"dc:date.accessioned":["2020-03-16T20:40:04Z"],"dc:date.available":["2020-03-16T20:40:04Z"],"dc:date.issued":["2019-05-31"],"dc:description.abstract":["The purpose of the study was to examine the test-retest reliability of the Western Aphasia Battery-Revised (WAB-R). Ten people with stroke-induced aphasia were administered the entire WAB-R twice. Correlation coefficients were .80 for 11/13 WAB-R sections/subtests. Paired t-tests revealed no significant difference between the means at Time 1 and Time 2 for any of the 13 WAB-R sections/subtests. Effect size was less than small for 11/13 WAB-R sections/subtests and small for two subtests. For 8/13 sections/subtests, one WAB-R standard error of measurement (SEM) represented less than 5% of the total number of points possible; thus, 68% of the time, persons with aphasia would be expected to score within 5% of the total number of points possible on repeated testing. For 5/13 sections/subtests, one WAB-R SEM represented more than 5% but less than 10% of the total number of points possible."],"dc:identifier.other":["http://dissertations.umi.com/ku:16541"],"dc:identifier.uri":["http://hdl.handle.net/1808/30075"],"dc:language.iso":["en"],"dc:publisher":["University of Kansas"],"dc:rights":["Copyright held by the author."],"dc:subject":["Speech therapy","Language","aphasia","assessment","score stability","test-retest reliability","Western Aphasia Battery-Revised"],"dc:title":["The test-retest reliability of the Western Aphasia Battery-Revised"],"dc:type":["Thesis"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-24T02:45:31Z"}