{"id":{"repo_id":"ku","oai_identifier":"oai:kuscholarworks.ku.edu:1808/26997"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/ku/oai:kuscholarworks.ku.edu:1808/26997","repository":{"repo_id":"ku","name":"University of Kansas","base_url":"https://kuscholarworks.ku.edu/server/oai/request"},"display":{"title":"Language in the U.S. and the Law: A Corpus Analysis of the Language of Language Policy","abstract":"The aim of this thesis is to study the textual positioning and portrayal of English and other languages in U.S. language policy and to see what implications that positioning and portrayal has for understanding possible impacts and interpretations of U.S. language policies. In order to do this, I use corpus linguistic techniques to study the ways that the terms English and other languages collocate with other words in the way that the policies themselves are written. I further this analysis with a reading of the policies that looks for themes across multiple texts. This kind of textual positioning is analyzed in detail to show how the portrayals of English and other languages might differ and what that could mean for our understanding of the implications, intentions, or possible interpretations of the policies.","abstract_html":"The aim of this thesis is to study the textual positioning and portrayal of English and other languages in U.S. language policy and to see what implications that positioning and portrayal has for understanding possible impacts and interpretations of U.S. language policies. In order to do this, I use corpus linguistic techniques to study the ways that the terms English and other languages collocate with other words in the way that the policies themselves are written. I further this analysis with a reading of the policies that looks for themes across multiple texts. This kind of textual positioning is analyzed in detail to show how the portrayals of English and other languages might differ and what that could mean for our understanding of the implications, intentions, or possible interpretations of the policies.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Carrillo, Peter William"],"institution":"University of Kansas","degree_name":null,"degree_level":null,"degree_discipline":null,"degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":[],"advisors":["Grund, Peter"],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2017,"date_issued":"2017-12-31","date_published":"2017-12-31","updated_at":"2026-07-24T02:46:05Z","subjects":["Linguistics","Corpus linguistics","Language ideology","Language policy"],"languages":["en"],"rights":["Copyright held by the author."],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier.other","label":"Dc Identifier Other","values":["http://dissertations.umi.com/ku:15696"],"render_values":[{"text":"http://dissertations.umi.com/ku:15696","href":"http://dissertations.umi.com/ku:15696","code":true}]}]},"links":{"outbound_url":"http://hdl.handle.net/1808/26997","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier.uri"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor.advisor","label":"Advisor","values":["Grund, Peter"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Carrillo, Peter William"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date.accessioned","label":"Dc Date Accessioned","values":["2018-10-24T21:56:48Z"]},{"key":"dc:date.available","label":"Dc Date Available","values":["2018-10-24T21:56:48Z"]},{"key":"dc:date.issued","label":"Date","values":["2017-12-31"]},{"key":"dc:publisher","label":"Institution","values":["University of Kansas"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["Thesis"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Linguistics","Corpus linguistics","Language ideology","Language policy"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language.iso","label":"Language (ISO)","values":["en"]},{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["Copyright held by the author."]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier.other","label":"Dc Identifier Other","values":["http://dissertations.umi.com/ku:15696"]},{"key":"dc:identifier.uri","label":"Identifier URI","values":["http://hdl.handle.net/1808/26997"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["The aim of this thesis is to study the textual positioning and portrayal of English and other languages in U.S. language policy and to see what implications that positioning and portrayal has for understanding possible impacts and interpretations of U.S. language policies. In order to do this, I use corpus linguistic techniques to study the ways that the terms English and other languages collocate with other words in the way that the policies themselves are written. I further this analysis with a reading of the policies that looks for themes across multiple texts. This kind of textual positioning is analyzed in detail to show how the portrayals of English and other languages might differ and what that could mean for our understanding of the implications, intentions, or possible interpretations of the policies."]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Language in the U.S. and the Law: A Corpus Analysis of the Language of Language Policy"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor.advisor":["Grund, Peter"],"dc:creator":["Carrillo, Peter William"],"dc:date.accessioned":["2018-10-24T21:56:48Z"],"dc:date.available":["2018-10-24T21:56:48Z"],"dc:date.issued":["2017-12-31"],"dc:description.abstract":["The aim of this thesis is to study the textual positioning and portrayal of English and other languages in U.S. language policy and to see what implications that positioning and portrayal has for understanding possible impacts and interpretations of U.S. language policies. In order to do this, I use corpus linguistic techniques to study the ways that the terms English and other languages collocate with other words in the way that the policies themselves are written. I further this analysis with a reading of the policies that looks for themes across multiple texts. This kind of textual positioning is analyzed in detail to show how the portrayals of English and other languages might differ and what that could mean for our understanding of the implications, intentions, or possible interpretations of the policies."],"dc:identifier.other":["http://dissertations.umi.com/ku:15696"],"dc:identifier.uri":["http://hdl.handle.net/1808/26997"],"dc:language.iso":["en"],"dc:publisher":["University of Kansas"],"dc:rights":["Copyright held by the author."],"dc:subject":["Linguistics","Corpus linguistics","Language ideology","Language policy"],"dc:title":["Language in the U.S. and the Law: A Corpus Analysis of the Language of Language Policy"],"dc:type":["Thesis"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-24T02:46:05Z"}