{"id":{"repo_id":"ku","oai_identifier":"oai:kuscholarworks.ku.edu:1808/18416"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/ku/oai:kuscholarworks.ku.edu:1808/18416","repository":{"repo_id":"ku","name":"University of Kansas","base_url":"https://kuscholarworks.ku.edu/server/oai/request"},"display":{"title":"LONG-TERM EFFECTS OF CONFIRMATION LIGHTS AND FACTORS THAT LEAD TO RED LIGHT RUNNING","abstract":"Red Light Running (RLR) is a safety concern for communities nationwide. The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) reported a total of 676 fatalities in 2009 were due to RLR. The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) reported that more than half of RLR crash fatalities are other than the driver (pedestrians, occupants, etc.). There are many strategies to mitigate RLR violations that fall in the category of engineering, enforcement, or education. This dissertation focused on confirmation lights which are a low-cost countermeasure that enhance enforcement at four-approach intersections. Confirmation lights were deployed at two intersections in Overland Park, Kansas. Traffic was observed at the treatment sites, nearby signalized intersections (spillover), and control sites. Traffic was recorded before deployment, one-month after, and three-months after deployment. A total 14 intersections were recorded during the morning peak hours (7 a.m. to 9 a.m.) and the afternoon peak hours (4 p.m. to 6 p.m.) for a total of 583 hours of traffic video. A test of proportions showed that overall the confirmation lights did not significantly reduce RLR violations. A violation analysis showed that there was a global increase in RLR violations after deployment, showing that other factors were involved in the increase of violations observed. Time into the red analysis showed that the majority of RLR violations occurred within one second into the red. The negative binomial regression model re-affirmed that the confirmation lights were not a significant factor in the RLR violations observed. The model showed that lane volume, presence of a right turn lane, and traffic movement (left or through movement) were significant factors.","abstract_html":"Red Light Running (RLR) is a safety concern for communities nationwide. The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) reported a total of 676 fatalities in 2009 were due to RLR. The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) reported that more than half of RLR crash fatalities are other than the driver (pedestrians, occupants, etc.). There are many strategies to mitigate RLR violations that fall in the category of engineering, enforcement, or education. This dissertation focused on confirmation lights which are a low-cost countermeasure that enhance enforcement at four-approach intersections. Confirmation lights were deployed at two intersections in Overland Park, Kansas. Traffic was observed at the treatment sites, nearby signalized intersections (spillover), and control sites. Traffic was recorded before deployment, one-month after, and three-months after deployment. A total 14 intersections were recorded during the morning peak hours (7 a.m. to 9 a.m.) and the afternoon peak hours (4 p.m. to 6 p.m.) for a total of 583 hours of traffic video. A test of proportions showed that overall the confirmation lights did not significantly reduce RLR violations. A violation analysis showed that there was a global increase in RLR violations after deployment, showing that other factors were involved in the increase of violations observed. Time into the red analysis showed that the majority of RLR violations occurred within one second into the red. The negative binomial regression model re-affirmed that the confirmation lights were not a significant factor in the RLR violations observed. The model showed that lane volume, presence of a right turn lane, and traffic movement (left or through movement) were significant factors.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Lindheimer, Tomas Ernesto"],"institution":"University of Kansas","degree_name":null,"degree_level":null,"degree_discipline":null,"degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":[],"advisors":["Schrock, Steve"],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2014,"date_issued":"2014-12-31","date_published":"2014-12-31","updated_at":"2026-07-24T02:46:40Z","subjects":["Civil engineering","Confirmation Lights","Law Enforcement","Red Light Running","Traffic Safety"],"languages":["en"],"rights":["Copyright held by the author."],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier.other","label":"Dc Identifier Other","values":["http://dissertations.umi.com/ku:13674"],"render_values":[{"text":"http://dissertations.umi.com/ku:13674","href":"http://dissertations.umi.com/ku:13674","code":true}]}]},"links":{"outbound_url":"http://hdl.handle.net/1808/18416","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier.uri"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor.advisor","label":"Advisor","values":["Schrock, Steve"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Lindheimer, Tomas Ernesto"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date.accessioned","label":"Dc Date Accessioned","values":["2015-09-07T22:26:26Z"]},{"key":"dc:date.available","label":"Dc Date Available","values":["2015-09-07T22:26:26Z"]},{"key":"dc:date.issued","label":"Date","values":["2014-12-31"]},{"key":"dc:publisher","label":"Institution","values":["University of Kansas"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["Dissertation"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Civil engineering","Confirmation Lights","Law Enforcement","Red Light Running","Traffic Safety"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language.iso","label":"Language (ISO)","values":["en"]},{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["Copyright held by the author."]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier.other","label":"Dc Identifier Other","values":["http://dissertations.umi.com/ku:13674"]},{"key":"dc:identifier.uri","label":"Identifier URI","values":["http://hdl.handle.net/1808/18416"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["Red Light Running (RLR) is a safety concern for communities nationwide. The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) reported a total of 676 fatalities in 2009 were due to RLR. The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) reported that more than half of RLR crash fatalities are other than the driver (pedestrians, occupants, etc.). There are many strategies to mitigate RLR violations that fall in the category of engineering, enforcement, or education. This dissertation focused on confirmation lights which are a low-cost countermeasure that enhance enforcement at four-approach intersections. Confirmation lights were deployed at two intersections in Overland Park, Kansas. Traffic was observed at the treatment sites, nearby signalized intersections (spillover), and control sites. Traffic was recorded before deployment, one-month after, and three-months after deployment. A total 14 intersections were recorded during the morning peak hours (7 a.m. to 9 a.m.) and the afternoon peak hours (4 p.m. to 6 p.m.) for a total of 583 hours of traffic video. A test of proportions showed that overall the confirmation lights did not significantly reduce RLR violations. A violation analysis showed that there was a global increase in RLR violations after deployment, showing that other factors were involved in the increase of violations observed. Time into the red analysis showed that the majority of RLR violations occurred within one second into the red. The negative binomial regression model re-affirmed that the confirmation lights were not a significant factor in the RLR violations observed. The model showed that lane volume, presence of a right turn lane, and traffic movement (left or through movement) were significant factors."]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["LONG-TERM EFFECTS OF CONFIRMATION LIGHTS AND FACTORS THAT LEAD TO RED LIGHT RUNNING"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor.advisor":["Schrock, Steve"],"dc:creator":["Lindheimer, Tomas Ernesto"],"dc:date.accessioned":["2015-09-07T22:26:26Z"],"dc:date.available":["2015-09-07T22:26:26Z"],"dc:date.issued":["2014-12-31"],"dc:description.abstract":["Red Light Running (RLR) is a safety concern for communities nationwide. The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) reported a total of 676 fatalities in 2009 were due to RLR. The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) reported that more than half of RLR crash fatalities are other than the driver (pedestrians, occupants, etc.). There are many strategies to mitigate RLR violations that fall in the category of engineering, enforcement, or education. This dissertation focused on confirmation lights which are a low-cost countermeasure that enhance enforcement at four-approach intersections. Confirmation lights were deployed at two intersections in Overland Park, Kansas. Traffic was observed at the treatment sites, nearby signalized intersections (spillover), and control sites. Traffic was recorded before deployment, one-month after, and three-months after deployment. A total 14 intersections were recorded during the morning peak hours (7 a.m. to 9 a.m.) and the afternoon peak hours (4 p.m. to 6 p.m.) for a total of 583 hours of traffic video. A test of proportions showed that overall the confirmation lights did not significantly reduce RLR violations. A violation analysis showed that there was a global increase in RLR violations after deployment, showing that other factors were involved in the increase of violations observed. Time into the red analysis showed that the majority of RLR violations occurred within one second into the red. The negative binomial regression model re-affirmed that the confirmation lights were not a significant factor in the RLR violations observed. The model showed that lane volume, presence of a right turn lane, and traffic movement (left or through movement) were significant factors."],"dc:identifier.other":["http://dissertations.umi.com/ku:13674"],"dc:identifier.uri":["http://hdl.handle.net/1808/18416"],"dc:language.iso":["en"],"dc:publisher":["University of Kansas"],"dc:rights":["Copyright held by the author."],"dc:subject":["Civil engineering","Confirmation Lights","Law Enforcement","Red Light Running","Traffic Safety"],"dc:title":["LONG-TERM EFFECTS OF CONFIRMATION LIGHTS AND FACTORS THAT LEAD TO RED LIGHT RUNNING"],"dc:type":["Dissertation"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-24T02:46:40Z"}