{"id":{"repo_id":"kennesaw","oai_identifier":"oai:digitalcommons.kennesaw.edu:phdba_etd-1000"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/kennesaw/oai:digitalcommons.kennesaw.edu:phdba_etd-1000","repository":{"repo_id":"kennesaw","name":"Kennesaw State University","base_url":"https://digitalcommons.kennesaw.edu/do/oai/"},"display":{"title":"The Examiniation of Entrepreneurial Investment Tax Credits: Angel vs. Crowdfunding Investing","abstract":"<p>Equity-investment credits are prevalent in the United States and other countries (Bell and Woodmansee, 2016), yet little evidence exists about the effectiveness of these credits at incentivizing individuals to invest. The intent of these credits is to spur entrepreneurial activity and in turn economic development (Acs, Asterbro, Audretsch, and Robinson, 2016; Bell, Wilbanks, and Hendon, 2013; Erken, Donselaar, and Thurik, 2016). The current study experimentally tests the influence of a tax credit on an individual’s likelihood to invest in startups across two risk settings, which parallel Angel and Crowdfunding investing methods.</p> <p>The study finds an equity-investment tax credit is effective at incentivizing investors to make risky capital investments in startups <em>when</em> the nature of risk for the investing method is characterized by low market-risk and high agency-risk, parallel to Crowdfunding. Notwithstanding the tax credit, individuals are more likely to invest when market risk is high and agency risk is low (parallel to Angel investing). The level of net-worth of the individual (low vs. high) did not influence the effectiveness of the credit. Yet, low net-worth individuals are more likely to invest overall. These results indicate that current investment tax credit programs, which target Angel investing, may not be necessary to incentivize investors. Instead, tax credit programs may be more effective if they are adapted to align with 2016 Crowdfunding regulation to incentivize investments in startups characterized by low market risk and high agency risk.</p>","abstract_html":"&lt;p&gt;Equity-investment credits are prevalent in the United States and other countries (Bell and Woodmansee, 2016), yet little evidence exists about the effectiveness of these credits at incentivizing individuals to invest. The intent of these credits is to spur entrepreneurial activity and in turn economic development (Acs, Asterbro, Audretsch, and Robinson, 2016; Bell, Wilbanks, and Hendon, 2013; Erken, Donselaar, and Thurik, 2016). The current study experimentally tests the influence of a tax credit on an individual’s likelihood to invest in startups across two risk settings, which parallel Angel and Crowdfunding investing methods.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;The study finds an equity-investment tax credit is effective at incentivizing investors to make risky capital investments in startups &lt;em&gt;when&lt;/em&gt; the nature of risk for the investing method is characterized by low market-risk and high agency-risk, parallel to Crowdfunding. Notwithstanding the tax credit, individuals are more likely to invest when market risk is high and agency risk is low (parallel to Angel investing). The level of net-worth of the individual (low vs. high) did not influence the effectiveness of the credit. Yet, low net-worth individuals are more likely to invest overall. These results indicate that current investment tax credit programs, which target Angel investing, may not be necessary to incentivize investors. Instead, tax credit programs may be more effective if they are adapted to align with 2016 Crowdfunding regulation to incentivize investments in startups characterized by low market risk and high agency risk.&lt;/p&gt;","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Barthel, Laura"],"institution":null,"degree_name":"Accounting","degree_level":"Dissertation","degree_discipline":"Business Administration","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Dr. Jennifer Schafer","Dr. Diana Falsetta"],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2019,"date_issued":"2019-01-24T08:00:00Z","date_published":"2019-01-24T08:00:00Z","updated_at":"2026-07-24T02:43:26Z","subjects":["Tax credits","transferrable credits","crowdfunding","entrepreneurial investments","early stage investors","Accounting","Business","Business Administration, Management, and Operations","Entrepreneurial and Small Business Operations","Taxation"],"languages":[],"rights":[],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"https://digitalcommons.kennesaw.edu/phdba_etd/1","outbound_label":"Repository record","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Dr. Jennifer Schafer","Dr. Diana Falsetta"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Barthel, Laura"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date.available","label":"Dc Date Available","values":["2024-03-28T07:00:00Z"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Business Administration"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Dissertation"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Accounting"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Tax credits","transferrable credits","crowdfunding","entrepreneurial investments","early stage investors","Accounting","Business","Business Administration, Management, and Operations","Entrepreneurial and Small Business Operations","Taxation"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["https://digitalcommons.kennesaw.edu/phdba_etd/1"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["<p>Equity-investment credits are prevalent in the United States and other countries (Bell and Woodmansee, 2016), yet little evidence exists about the effectiveness of these credits at incentivizing individuals to invest. The intent of these credits is to spur entrepreneurial activity and in turn economic development (Acs, Asterbro, Audretsch, and Robinson, 2016; Bell, Wilbanks, and Hendon, 2013; Erken, Donselaar, and Thurik, 2016). The current study experimentally tests the influence of a tax credit on an individual’s likelihood to invest in startups across two risk settings, which parallel Angel and Crowdfunding investing methods.</p> <p>The study finds an equity-investment tax credit is effective at incentivizing investors to make risky capital investments in startups <em>when</em> the nature of risk for the investing method is characterized by low market-risk and high agency-risk, parallel to Crowdfunding. Notwithstanding the tax credit, individuals are more likely to invest when market risk is high and agency risk is low (parallel to Angel investing). The level of net-worth of the individual (low vs. high) did not influence the effectiveness of the credit. Yet, low net-worth individuals are more likely to invest overall. These results indicate that current investment tax credit programs, which target Angel investing, may not be necessary to incentivize investors. Instead, tax credit programs may be more effective if they are adapted to align with 2016 Crowdfunding regulation to incentivize investments in startups characterized by low market risk and high agency risk.</p>"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["The Examiniation of Entrepreneurial Investment Tax Credits: Angel vs. Crowdfunding Investing"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Dr. Jennifer Schafer","Dr. Diana Falsetta"],"dc:creator":["Barthel, Laura"],"dc:date.available":["2024-03-28T07:00:00Z"],"dc:description.abstract":["<p>Equity-investment credits are prevalent in the United States and other countries (Bell and Woodmansee, 2016), yet little evidence exists about the effectiveness of these credits at incentivizing individuals to invest. The intent of these credits is to spur entrepreneurial activity and in turn economic development (Acs, Asterbro, Audretsch, and Robinson, 2016; Bell, Wilbanks, and Hendon, 2013; Erken, Donselaar, and Thurik, 2016). The current study experimentally tests the influence of a tax credit on an individual’s likelihood to invest in startups across two risk settings, which parallel Angel and Crowdfunding investing methods.</p> <p>The study finds an equity-investment tax credit is effective at incentivizing investors to make risky capital investments in startups <em>when</em> the nature of risk for the investing method is characterized by low market-risk and high agency-risk, parallel to Crowdfunding. Notwithstanding the tax credit, individuals are more likely to invest when market risk is high and agency risk is low (parallel to Angel investing). The level of net-worth of the individual (low vs. high) did not influence the effectiveness of the credit. Yet, low net-worth individuals are more likely to invest overall. These results indicate that current investment tax credit programs, which target Angel investing, may not be necessary to incentivize investors. Instead, tax credit programs may be more effective if they are adapted to align with 2016 Crowdfunding regulation to incentivize investments in startups characterized by low market risk and high agency risk.</p>"],"dc:identifier":["https://digitalcommons.kennesaw.edu/phdba_etd/1"],"dc:subject":["Tax credits","transferrable credits","crowdfunding","entrepreneurial investments","early stage investors","Accounting","Business","Business Administration, Management, and Operations","Entrepreneurial and Small Business Operations","Taxation"],"dc:title":["The Examiniation of Entrepreneurial Investment Tax Credits: Angel vs. Crowdfunding Investing"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Business Administration"],"thesis:degree_level":["Dissertation"],"thesis:degree_name":["Accounting"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-24T02:43:26Z"}