Back to results

Kennesaw State University

Heien v. North Carolina and Significant Interpretive Court Cases: An Empirical Examination of Police Officers’ Perceptions and Knowledge

Abstract

dc:description.abstract

<p>This empirical study examines legal aspects of policing in relation to the recent, landmark United States Supreme Court case of <em>Heien v. North Carolina</em>. In <em>Heien</em>, the Court found that objectively reasonable mistakes of law by police can support traffic stops. By doing so, it extends the permissible margin of error for stops by law enforcement officers. Due to the potential, far-reaching implications of the <em>Heien</em> decision, including implications for law enforcement and for the Fourth Amendment privacy protections of individuals, it is important to better understand how the lower courts have interpreted and applied <em>Heien</em>. Therefore, key, recent interpretive lower court case law for <em>Heien</em> is also analyzed. Furthermore, it is also important to discover what law enforcement officers know about the <em>Heien</em> decision and how they may be applying it. This study aims to discern the level, degree, and nature of police officers’ knowledge and perceptions of <em>Heien</em>, including officers’ decision-making behavior with respect to <em>Heien</em> and its core concepts. Utilizing a survey questionnaire administered to line officers, this study seeks to shed light on police officers’ knowledge and perceptions of <em>Heien</em>. This is the first known study to empirically examine officers’ knowledge and perceptions of <em>Heien</em>.</p>

Degree

thesis:*
Name thesis:degree_name
Master of Science in Criminal Justice (MSCJ)
Level thesis:degree_level
Thesis
Discipline thesis:degree_discipline
Sociology and Criminal Justice
Year dc:date.available
2019

Author and committee

dc:creator, dc:contributor.*
Author dc:creator
  • De Leo, Michael
Contributors dc:contributor
  • Dr. Christopher Totten
  • Dr. Gang Lee
  • Dr. Peter Fenton

Subjects

dc:subject × 7

Identifiers

dc:identifier.*
Repository record dc:identifier
https://digitalcommons.kennesaw.edu/mscj_etd/9
OAI identifier oai:identifier
oai:digitalcommons.kennesaw.edu:mscj_etd-1008

Chain of custody

source
Harvested from
Kennesaw State University
Base URL
digitalcommons.kennesaw.edu/do/oai/
Last updated
2026-07-24
Source record
OAI-PMH GetRecord
citation

De Leo, Michael. Heien v. North Carolina and Significant Interpretive Court Cases: An Empirical Examination of Police Officers’ Perceptions and Knowledge. Thesis thesis, 2019. https://digitalcommons.kennesaw.edu/mscj_etd/9