Most theories in merger and acquisition (M&A) research use an individual or group level of analysis and address behavioral issues in M&A integration and adaptation. Relatively few studies apply a firm level analysis to investigate strategic issues pertaining to autonomy and decision-making authority. This study used neo-institutional theory to investigate the relationship between acquired firm autonomy and integration success at the firm level. It also sought to identify possible moderating impacts of an acquired firm’s pre-acquisition organizational archetype, e.g. professionally managed private, or founder owned and operated, as well as the acquired firm’s leadership experience with previous M&A integration. Furthermore, unlike the majority of extant M&A literature, which commonly takes the perspective of the acquirer firm, I explored the perspective of the acquired firm. The study focused on middle market firms acquired by public corporations to provide variation of acquired firm organizational archetypes. Our results underscore the complexities of measuring a relationship between autonomy allocation and integrations success. It additionally expands the exploration of causal antecedents that influence that relationship.
","abstract_html":"<p>Most theories in merger and acquisition (M&A) research use an individual or group level of analysis and address behavioral issues in M&A integration and adaptation. Relatively few studies apply a firm level analysis to investigate strategic issues pertaining to autonomy and decision-making authority. This study used neo-institutional theory to investigate the relationship between acquired firm autonomy and integration success at the firm level. It also sought to identify possible moderating impacts of an acquired firm’s pre-acquisition organizational archetype, e.g. professionally managed private, or founder owned and operated, as well as the acquired firm’s leadership experience with previous M&A integration. Furthermore, unlike the majority of extant M&A literature, which commonly takes the perspective of the acquirer firm, I explored the perspective of the acquired firm. The study focused on middle market firms acquired by public corporations to provide variation of acquired firm organizational archetypes. Our results underscore the complexities of measuring a relationship between autonomy allocation and integrations success. It additionally expands the exploration of causal antecedents that influence that relationship.</p>","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Reich, Robert Weichel"],"institution":null,"degree_name":"Doctor of Business Administration (DBA)","degree_level":"Dissertation","degree_discipline":"Management","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Dr. Franz W. Kellermanns","Dr. Torsten M. Pieper","Dr. Rajaram Veliyath"],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2013,"date_issued":"2013-07-01T07:00:00Z","date_published":"2013-07-01T07:00:00Z","updated_at":"2026-07-24T02:42:53Z","subjects":["mergers and acquisitions","strategic issues","organizational archetypes","autonomy","integration","acquired firms","Entrepreneurial and Small Business Operations"],"languages":[],"rights":[],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"https://digitalcommons.kennesaw.edu/etd/575","outbound_label":"Repository record","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Dr. Franz W. Kellermanns","Dr. Torsten M. Pieper","Dr. Rajaram Veliyath"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Reich, Robert Weichel"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date.available","label":"Dc Date Available","values":["2013-07-11T07:00:00Z"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Management"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Dissertation"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Doctor of Business Administration (DBA)"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["mergers and acquisitions","strategic issues","organizational archetypes","autonomy","integration","acquired firms","Entrepreneurial and Small Business Operations"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["https://digitalcommons.kennesaw.edu/etd/575"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["Most theories in merger and acquisition (M&A) research use an individual or group level of analysis and address behavioral issues in M&A integration and adaptation. Relatively few studies apply a firm level analysis to investigate strategic issues pertaining to autonomy and decision-making authority. This study used neo-institutional theory to investigate the relationship between acquired firm autonomy and integration success at the firm level. It also sought to identify possible moderating impacts of an acquired firm’s pre-acquisition organizational archetype, e.g. professionally managed private, or founder owned and operated, as well as the acquired firm’s leadership experience with previous M&A integration. Furthermore, unlike the majority of extant M&A literature, which commonly takes the perspective of the acquirer firm, I explored the perspective of the acquired firm. The study focused on middle market firms acquired by public corporations to provide variation of acquired firm organizational archetypes. Our results underscore the complexities of measuring a relationship between autonomy allocation and integrations success. It additionally expands the exploration of causal antecedents that influence that relationship.
"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["The Impact of Post-Acquisition Autonomy upon Small to Medium Enterprise Integration Success"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Dr. Franz W. Kellermanns","Dr. Torsten M. Pieper","Dr. Rajaram Veliyath"],"dc:creator":["Reich, Robert Weichel"],"dc:date.available":["2013-07-11T07:00:00Z"],"dc:description.abstract":["Most theories in merger and acquisition (M&A) research use an individual or group level of analysis and address behavioral issues in M&A integration and adaptation. Relatively few studies apply a firm level analysis to investigate strategic issues pertaining to autonomy and decision-making authority. This study used neo-institutional theory to investigate the relationship between acquired firm autonomy and integration success at the firm level. It also sought to identify possible moderating impacts of an acquired firm’s pre-acquisition organizational archetype, e.g. professionally managed private, or founder owned and operated, as well as the acquired firm’s leadership experience with previous M&A integration. Furthermore, unlike the majority of extant M&A literature, which commonly takes the perspective of the acquirer firm, I explored the perspective of the acquired firm. The study focused on middle market firms acquired by public corporations to provide variation of acquired firm organizational archetypes. Our results underscore the complexities of measuring a relationship between autonomy allocation and integrations success. It additionally expands the exploration of causal antecedents that influence that relationship.
"],"dc:identifier":["https://digitalcommons.kennesaw.edu/etd/575"],"dc:subject":["mergers and acquisitions","strategic issues","organizational archetypes","autonomy","integration","acquired firms","Entrepreneurial and Small Business Operations"],"dc:title":["The Impact of Post-Acquisition Autonomy upon Small to Medium Enterprise Integration Success"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Management"],"thesis:degree_level":["Dissertation"],"thesis:degree_name":["Doctor of Business Administration (DBA)"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-24T02:42:53Z"}