Biomechanical and histological evaluation of a new zirconia implant in a canine model
type: CreativeWork
description: Background: Currently titanium implant fixtures are considered as a gold standard because of their biocompatibility and their clinical success rates have been well documented. The esthetic outcome of restorations supported by titanium implants may be compromised if the dark gray color of the implant shows through a thin peri-implant mucosa or if the implant fixture becomes visible following soft tissue recession. Also titanium might cause allergic reactions. For these reasons, zirconia implants have been considered as alternative materials because of their white color, high material properties and biocompatibilities. Still, further investigations are necessary to confirm the in-vivo performance of these implants. Purpose: The purpose of this study is to determine the histomorphometric and biomechanical properties of zirconia implants manufactured by Shofu Inc. with a sand-blasted and acid-etched surface treatment, compared to that of the titanium implants from the same manufacturer with a sand-blasted and acid-etched surface treatment in a canine model. Material and Methods: Six beagle dogs (1-2 years old) will be used in this split mouth trial. After 8 weeks following extraction of the second to fourth mandibular premolars, zirconia implants (experimental group) and titanium implants (control group) were placed on the each side of mandible. At 8 weeks and 12 weeks after implant placement, the animals were sacrificed, and implants were removed in block sections, and histological and histomorphometric analyses were measured. Specifically, the bone-implant contact (BIC), bone area (BA), removal torque (RTQ), mineral apposition rate (MAR), bone forming area (BFA), and Periotest value (PTV) of the two groups were studied and compared. Results: At 12 weeks post operatively, one Shofu thread type Ti implant were not integrated. Over all failure implant was 0/12 in zirconia group, and 1/12 in titanium group. In 8 weeks samples, only statistical differences were higher BA (…
abstract: Background: Currently titanium implant fixtures are considered as a gold standard because of their biocompatibility and their clinical success rates have been well documented. The esthetic outcome of restorations supported by titanium implants may be compromised if the dark gray color of the implant shows through a thin peri-implant mucosa or if the implant fixture becomes visible following soft tissue recession. Also titanium might cause allergic reactions. For these reasons, zirconia implants have been considered as alternative materials because of their white color, high material properties and biocompatibilities. Still, further investigations are necessary to confirm the in-vivo performance of these implants. Purpose: The purpose of this study is to determine the histomorphometric and biomechanical properties of zirconia implants manufactured by Shofu Inc. with a sand-blasted and acid-etched surface treatment, compared to that of the titanium implants from the same manufacturer with a sand-blasted and acid-etched surface treatment in a canine model. Material and Methods: Six beagle dogs (1-2 years old) will be used in this split mouth trial. After 8 weeks following extraction of the second to fourth mandibular premolars, zirconia implants (experimental group) and titanium implants (control group) were placed on the each side of mandible. At 8 weeks and 12 weeks after implant placement, the animals were sacrificed, and implants were removed in block sections, and histological and histomorphometric analyses were measured. Specifically, the bone-implant contact (BIC), bone area (BA), removal torque (RTQ), mineral apposition rate (MAR), bone forming area (BFA), and Periotest value (PTV) of the two groups were studied and compared. Results: At 12 weeks post operatively, one Shofu thread type Ti implant were not integrated. Over all failure implant was 0/12 in zirconia group, and 1/12 in titanium group. In 8 weeks samples, only statistical differences were higher BA (…
author: Hamada, Yusuke
language: en_US
license: http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
date published: 2015
date modified: 2026-07-24T02:40:46Z
provider: IUPUI
publisher: Networked Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations
type: WebPage
source organization: IUPUI

PropertyValue
property ID: Handle
value: https://hdl.handle.net/1805/6555

PropertyValue
property ID: DOI
value: 10.7912/C2/1597