Back to results

IUPUI

The Comparison of the Tensile, Shear-Peel, and Torque Orthodontic Bond Strength Test Methods Performed on a Resin and Two Glass Ionomer Cements

Abstract

dc:description.abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare the tensile, shear-peel, and torque bond strength testing methods using a commercially available resin (R), light-cured (LC), and chemically cured (CC) glass ionomer. Sixty-three bovine incisors were randomly divided into three groups. Stainless steel incisor brackets were bonded to the prepared facial surfaces, and the specimens were stored in deionized water at 37° C for 38 hours. The specimens were then tested to failure using three loading modes. The bracket and enamel surfaces of each specimen were visually examined to determine the site of bond failure. R had the highest mean tensile, shear-peel, and torque bond strength. LC had a higher mean shear-peel and torque bond strength than CC. Tension testing left more adhesive than shear-peel and torque for CC, and more than shear-peel for R. The amount of LC left on enamel is positively correlated with bond strength for tension, shear-peel and torque. R remaining on enamel was positively correlated with bond strength only in tension. This study illustrates that loading mode does not appear to affect the relative bond strengths.

Author and committee

dc:creator, dc:contributor.*
Author dc:creator
  • Madding, Sigrid Elaine
Advisor dc:contributor.advisor
  • Katona, Thomas R.

Subjects

dc:subject × 4

Rights

Language dc:language.iso
en_US

Identifiers

dc:identifier.*
Handle dc:identifier.uri
https://hdl.handle.net/1805/37030
OAI identifier oai:identifier
oai:scholarworks.indianapolis.iu.edu:1805/37030

Chain of custody

source
Harvested from
IUPUI
Base URL
scholarworks.indianapolis.iu.edu/server/oai/request
Last updated
2026-07-24
Source record
OAI-PMH GetRecord
citation

Madding, Sigrid Elaine. The Comparison of the Tensile, Shear-Peel, and Torque Orthodontic Bond Strength Test Methods Performed on a Resin and Two Glass Ionomer Cements. 1996. https://hdl.handle.net/1805/37030