The Story of Medicine: From Paternalism to Partnership

Physicians were interviewed and asked about their perspectives on communicating with patients, media, and the ways in which the biomedical and biopsychosocial models function in the practice of medicine. Fisher’s Narrative Paradigm was the primary critical method applied to themes that emerged from the interviews. Those emergent themes included the importance of a team approach to patient care; perspectives on physicians as bad communicators; and successful communication strategies when talking to patients. Physicians rely on nurses and other support staff, but the most important partnership is that between the physician and patient. Narrative fidelity and probability are satisfied by strategies physicians use in communicating with patients: using understandable language when talking to patients; engaging in nonverbal tactics of sitting down with patients, making eye contact with patients, and making appropriate physical contact with them in the form of a handshake or a light touch on the arm. Physicians are frustrated by media’s reporting of preliminary study results that omit details as well as media’s fostering of expectations for quick diagnostic processes and magical cures within the public. Furthermore, physicians see the biomedical and biopsychosocial models becoming increasingly interdependent in the practice of medicine, which carries the story of contemporary medicine further into the realm of partnership, revealing its humanity as well as its fading paternalism.

Author dc:creator

• Marks, Jennifer Lynn

Advisor dc:contributor.advisor

• Parrish-Sprowl, John

• medicine
• physician
• communication
• patient
• partnership
• narrative
• story
• structural coherence
• material coherence
• characterological coherence

Language dc:language.iso

en_US

Identifier URI

http://dx.doi.org/10.7912/C2/454

OAI identifier oai:identifier

oai:scholarworks.indianapolis.iu.edu:1805/3202