{"id":{"repo_id":"iastate","oai_identifier":"oai:dr.lib.iastate.edu:20.500.12876/25562"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/iastate/oai:dr.lib.iastate.edu:20.500.12876/25562","repository":{"repo_id":"iastate","name":"Iowa State University","base_url":"https://dr.lib.iastate.edu/server/oai/request"},"display":{"title":"Existing off the Map: Reading Stein and Barnes as Hybrid Architects","abstract":"<p>Countless scholarly works have been devoted to the modernist movement and, more specifically, to Gertrude Stein's <i>The Autobiography of Alice B. Toklas</i> and Djuna Barnes's <i>Nightwood</i>. The notion of hybridity, however, has remained largely absent from published works about these texts. This project seeks to uncover hybrid elements from these two texts as well as determine some of the implications of their hybridity. I begin the analysis by exploring the links between Gloria Anzaldya's <i>Borderlands</i>, Adrienne Rich's \"Compulsory Heterosexuality and Lesbian Existence,\" and Judith Butler's <i>Gender Trouble</i>. Together these three writers' theories offer a working definition of hybridity as a move or a strategy that seeks to create habitable spaces where boundaries of right and wrong, acceptable and unacceptable, are pushed aside. Tracing this overarching stance on hybridity through the <i>Autobiography</i> and <i>Nightwood</i> unveils hybrid texts drafted through the use of gender play, the refusal of compulsory heterosexuality, and literary innovation. From this stance, the <i>Autobiography</i> and <i>Nightwood</i> have renewed power to change literary history as well as the future, literary or otherwise.</p>","abstract_html":"&lt;p&gt;Countless scholarly works have been devoted to the modernist movement and, more specifically, to Gertrude Stein&#x27;s &lt;i&gt;The Autobiography of Alice B. Toklas&lt;/i&gt; and Djuna Barnes&#x27;s &lt;i&gt;Nightwood&lt;/i&gt;. The notion of hybridity, however, has remained largely absent from published works about these texts. This project seeks to uncover hybrid elements from these two texts as well as determine some of the implications of their hybridity. I begin the analysis by exploring the links between Gloria Anzaldya&#x27;s &lt;i&gt;Borderlands&lt;/i&gt;, Adrienne Rich&#x27;s &quot;Compulsory Heterosexuality and Lesbian Existence,&quot; and Judith Butler&#x27;s &lt;i&gt;Gender Trouble&lt;/i&gt;. Together these three writers&#x27; theories offer a working definition of hybridity as a move or a strategy that seeks to create habitable spaces where boundaries of right and wrong, acceptable and unacceptable, are pushed aside. Tracing this overarching stance on hybridity through the &lt;i&gt;Autobiography&lt;/i&gt; and &lt;i&gt;Nightwood&lt;/i&gt; unveils hybrid texts drafted through the use of gender play, the refusal of compulsory heterosexuality, and literary innovation. From this stance, the &lt;i&gt;Autobiography&lt;/i&gt; and &lt;i&gt;Nightwood&lt;/i&gt; have renewed power to change literary history as well as the future, literary or otherwise.&lt;/p&gt;","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Malone, Marc"],"institution":null,"degree_name":"Master of Arts","degree_level":"thesis","degree_discipline":null,"degree_department":"Department of English","school":null,"contributors":[],"advisors":["Kathy Hickok"],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2010,"date_issued":"2010-01-01","date_published":"2010-01-01","updated_at":"2026-07-24T02:38:12Z","subjects":[],"languages":["en"],"rights":[],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier.doi","label":"DOI","values":["https://doi.org/10.31274/etd-180810-3097"],"render_values":[{"text":"https://doi.org/10.31274/etd-180810-3097","href":"https://doi.org/10.31274/etd-180810-3097","code":true}]},{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["archive/lib.dr.iastate.edu/etd/11356/"],"render_values":[{"text":"archive/lib.dr.iastate.edu/etd/11356/","href":null,"code":true}]}]},"links":{"outbound_url":"https://dr.lib.iastate.edu/handle/20.500.12876/25562","outbound_label":"Repository record","outbound_source":"dc:identifier.uri"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor.advisor","label":"Advisor","values":["Kathy Hickok"]},{"key":"dc:contributor.department","label":"Department","values":["Department of English"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Malone, Marc"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date","label":"Dc Date","values":["2018-08-11T19:01:22.000"]},{"key":"dc:date.accessioned","label":"Dc Date Accessioned","values":["2020-06-30T02:35:06Z"]},{"key":"dc:date.available","label":"Dc Date Available","values":["2020-06-30T02:35:06Z"]},{"key":"dc:date.issued","label":"Date","values":["2010-01-01"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["thesis"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["thesis"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Master of Arts"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language.iso","label":"Language (ISO)","values":["en"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["archive/lib.dr.iastate.edu/etd/11356/"]},{"key":"dc:identifier.doi","label":"DOI","values":["https://doi.org/10.31274/etd-180810-3097"]},{"key":"dc:identifier.uri","label":"Identifier URI","values":["https://dr.lib.iastate.edu/handle/20.500.12876/25562"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["<p>Countless scholarly works have been devoted to the modernist movement and, more specifically, to Gertrude Stein's <i>The Autobiography of Alice B. Toklas</i> and Djuna Barnes's <i>Nightwood</i>. The notion of hybridity, however, has remained largely absent from published works about these texts. This project seeks to uncover hybrid elements from these two texts as well as determine some of the implications of their hybridity. I begin the analysis by exploring the links between Gloria Anzaldya's <i>Borderlands</i>, Adrienne Rich's \"Compulsory Heterosexuality and Lesbian Existence,\" and Judith Butler's <i>Gender Trouble</i>. Together these three writers' theories offer a working definition of hybridity as a move or a strategy that seeks to create habitable spaces where boundaries of right and wrong, acceptable and unacceptable, are pushed aside. Tracing this overarching stance on hybridity through the <i>Autobiography</i> and <i>Nightwood</i> unveils hybrid texts drafted through the use of gender play, the refusal of compulsory heterosexuality, and literary innovation. From this stance, the <i>Autobiography</i> and <i>Nightwood</i> have renewed power to change literary history as well as the future, literary or otherwise.</p>"]},{"key":"dc:format.mimetype","label":"Dc Format Mimetype","values":["application/pdf"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Existing off the Map: Reading Stein and Barnes as Hybrid Architects"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor.advisor":["Kathy Hickok"],"dc:contributor.department":["Department of English"],"dc:creator":["Malone, Marc"],"dc:date":["2018-08-11T19:01:22.000"],"dc:date.accessioned":["2020-06-30T02:35:06Z"],"dc:date.available":["2020-06-30T02:35:06Z"],"dc:date.issued":["2010-01-01"],"dc:description.abstract":["<p>Countless scholarly works have been devoted to the modernist movement and, more specifically, to Gertrude Stein's <i>The Autobiography of Alice B. Toklas</i> and Djuna Barnes's <i>Nightwood</i>. The notion of hybridity, however, has remained largely absent from published works about these texts. This project seeks to uncover hybrid elements from these two texts as well as determine some of the implications of their hybridity. I begin the analysis by exploring the links between Gloria Anzaldya's <i>Borderlands</i>, Adrienne Rich's \"Compulsory Heterosexuality and Lesbian Existence,\" and Judith Butler's <i>Gender Trouble</i>. Together these three writers' theories offer a working definition of hybridity as a move or a strategy that seeks to create habitable spaces where boundaries of right and wrong, acceptable and unacceptable, are pushed aside. Tracing this overarching stance on hybridity through the <i>Autobiography</i> and <i>Nightwood</i> unveils hybrid texts drafted through the use of gender play, the refusal of compulsory heterosexuality, and literary innovation. From this stance, the <i>Autobiography</i> and <i>Nightwood</i> have renewed power to change literary history as well as the future, literary or otherwise.</p>"],"dc:format.mimetype":["application/pdf"],"dc:identifier":["archive/lib.dr.iastate.edu/etd/11356/"],"dc:identifier.doi":["https://doi.org/10.31274/etd-180810-3097"],"dc:identifier.uri":["https://dr.lib.iastate.edu/handle/20.500.12876/25562"],"dc:language.iso":["en"],"dc:title":["Existing off the Map: Reading Stein and Barnes as Hybrid Architects"],"dc:type":["thesis"],"thesis:degree_level":["thesis"],"thesis:degree_name":["Master of Arts"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-24T02:38:12Z"}