TEACHERS’ UNDERSTANDINGS ABOUT SCIENCE AND MATHEMATICS INTEGRATION

In this era dominated by the importance of mathematics, science, and technology, national organizations in science and mathematics education (e.g., National Science Teachers Association and the National Council for Teachers of Mathematics) advocate for teaching of science and mathematics concepts through integration. A more comprehensive understanding of what teachers understand about integration is needed to put such recommendations into practice. This study identified and described three science teachers’ understandings of science and mathematics integration. The teachers were enrolled in a master’s program that focused on the integration of science and mathematics, reflective practices, and the integration of technology into instructional practices. A case study approach included data sources such as program assignments, selected by the teacher as representative of integration, a constructed response survey, a classroom observation of an integration lesson, field notes made by the researcher, and a semi-structured interview. Data analysis strategies included unitizing, categorizing, and sorting (Lincoln & Guba, 1985) as well as continual revision, modification (Erlandson, Harris, Skipper, & Allen, 1993), and construction of coding schemes (Carspecken, 1996). Three themes that describe the teachers’ understandings of science and mathematics integration emerged: (a) Mathematics is a means of analyzing scientific data and to enhance the explanation of scientific conclusions, (b) Content specific skills and concepts should be taught separately to allow for deeper discussion and data analysis when integrating, and (c) Integration is a catalyst for increasing student motivation for learning each discipline. The analysis also revealed that the teachers believed that integration of science and mathematics would be more effectively and efficiently implemented with appropriate support systems. The researcher recommends professional development, mentoring, and collaboration within integrated teams as strategies that would support teachers’ implementation of science and mathematics. In addition, further research should be performed to determine the effects of science and mathematics integration on student achievement in science and mathematics. Carspecken, P. F. (1996). Critical ethnography in educational research: a theoretical and practical guide. New York: Routledge. Erlandson, D. A., Harris, E. L., Skipper, B. L., & Allen, S. D. (1993). Doing naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, Calif.: Sage Publications.

Name thesis:degree_name

Doctor of Education

Level thesis:degree_level

Doctoral

Discipline thesis:degree_discipline

Curriculum and Instruction

Grantor

University of Houston

Year dc:date.issued

2014

Author dc:creator

• Cain, Raymond

Advisors dc:contributor.advisor

• Chauvot, Jennifer
• Wong, Sissy S.

Committee members dc:contributor.committeemember

• Lee, Mimi Miyoung
• Hutchison, Laveria F.

• Science
• Mathematics
• Integration

Statement dc:rights

• The author of this work is the copyright owner. UH Libraries and the Texas Digital Library have their permission to store and provide access to this work. Further transmission, reproduction, or presentation of this work is prohibited except with permission of the author(s).

Language dc:language.iso

eng

Handle dc:identifier.uri

http://hdl.handle.net/10657/1423

OAI identifier oai:identifier

oai:uh-ir.tdl.org:10657/1423