{"id":{"repo_id":"houston","oai_identifier":"oai:uh-ir.tdl.org:10657/1032"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/houston/oai:uh-ir.tdl.org:10657/1032","repository":{"repo_id":"houston","name":"University of Houston","base_url":"https://uh-ir.tdl.org/server/oai/request"},"display":{"title":"COMPARING INCORRECT ANSWER PERCENTAGE DISPERSIONS IN STATEWIDE READING COMPREHENSION SCORES AND THEIR IMPLICATIONS FOR SCHOOL LEADERS","abstract":"This Differential Distractor Functioning (DDF) study involved 855,023 regular education students in Grades 3, 6, and 11 in Texas. Percentage dispersion anomalies were identified in the 2009 Texas Assessment of Knowledge and Skills Item Analysis Reports provided by the Texas Education Agency. Questions addressed in this investigation were: How many students answered incorrectly on certain test items? What items had the highest frequency of a single wrong answer? Which test objectives had balanced/even dispersions? Were these dispersions similar in other grade levels? Data analyses yielded an increase in incorrect answer anomalies by 8% from Grade 3 to Grade 11. Furthermore, a 100% incorrect answer anomaly was revealed for Objective 2 – Applying Literary Elements for Grade 6 students. From these results, educational leaders need to examine more closely specific objectives and test items so that they can determine underlying reasons for students not answering these objectives and test items correctly.","abstract_html":"This Differential Distractor Functioning (DDF) study involved 855,023 regular education students in Grades 3, 6, and 11 in Texas. Percentage dispersion anomalies were identified in the 2009 Texas Assessment of Knowledge and Skills Item Analysis Reports provided by the Texas Education Agency. Questions addressed in this investigation were: How many students answered incorrectly on certain test items? What items had the highest frequency of a single wrong answer? Which test objectives had balanced/even dispersions? Were these dispersions similar in other grade levels? Data analyses yielded an increase in incorrect answer anomalies by 8% from Grade 3 to Grade 11. Furthermore, a 100% incorrect answer anomaly was revealed for Objective 2 – Applying Literary Elements for Grade 6 students. From these results, educational leaders need to examine more closely specific objectives and test items so that they can determine underlying reasons for students not answering these objectives and test items correctly.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Linden, Nancy Ellen 1965-"],"institution":"University of Houston","degree_name":"Doctor of Education","degree_level":"Doctoral","degree_discipline":"Professional Leadership","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":[],"advisors":["Warner, Allen R."],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":["Busch, Steven D.","MacNeil, Angus J.","Hutchison, Laveria F."],"year":2013,"date_issued":"2013-05","date_published":"2013-05","updated_at":"2026-07-24T02:32:58Z","subjects":["Assessments","Reading comprehension","Testing","Standardized testing","Incorrect answer options"],"languages":["eng"],"rights":["The author of this work is the copyright owner. UH Libraries and the Texas Digital Library have their permission to store and provide access to this work. Further transmission, reproduction, or presentation of this work is prohibited except with permission of the author(s)."],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"http://hdl.handle.net/10657/1032","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier.uri"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor.advisor","label":"Advisor","values":["Warner, Allen R."]},{"key":"dc:contributor.committeemember","label":"Committee Member","values":["Busch, Steven D.","MacNeil, Angus J.","Hutchison, Laveria F."]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Linden, Nancy Ellen 1965-"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date.accessioned","label":"Dc Date Accessioned","values":["2015-08-24T03:19:19Z"]},{"key":"dc:date.available","label":"Dc Date Available","values":["2015-08-24T03:19:19Z"]},{"key":"dc:date.issued","label":"Date","values":["2013-05"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Professional Leadership"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Doctoral"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Doctor of Education"]},{"key":"thesis:institution_name","label":"Thesis Institution Name","values":["University of Houston"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Assessments","Reading comprehension","Testing","Standardized testing","Incorrect answer options"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language.iso","label":"Language (ISO)","values":["eng"]},{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["The author of this work is the copyright owner. UH Libraries and the Texas Digital Library have their permission to store and provide access to this work. Further transmission, reproduction, or presentation of this work is prohibited except with permission of the author(s)."]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier.uri","label":"Identifier URI","values":["http://hdl.handle.net/10657/1032"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["This Differential Distractor Functioning (DDF) study involved 855,023 regular education students in Grades 3, 6, and 11 in Texas. Percentage dispersion anomalies were identified in the 2009 Texas Assessment of Knowledge and Skills Item Analysis Reports provided by the Texas Education Agency. Questions addressed in this investigation were: How many students answered incorrectly on certain test items? What items had the highest frequency of a single wrong answer? Which test objectives had balanced/even dispersions? Were these dispersions similar in other grade levels? Data analyses yielded an increase in incorrect answer anomalies by 8% from Grade 3 to Grade 11. Furthermore, a 100% incorrect answer anomaly was revealed for Objective 2 – Applying Literary Elements for Grade 6 students. From these results, educational leaders need to examine more closely specific objectives and test items so that they can determine underlying reasons for students not answering these objectives and test items correctly."]},{"key":"dc:format.mimetype","label":"Dc Format Mimetype","values":["application/pdf"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["COMPARING INCORRECT ANSWER PERCENTAGE DISPERSIONS IN STATEWIDE READING COMPREHENSION SCORES AND THEIR IMPLICATIONS FOR SCHOOL LEADERS"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor.advisor":["Warner, Allen R."],"dc:contributor.committeemember":["Busch, Steven D.","MacNeil, Angus J.","Hutchison, Laveria F."],"dc:creator":["Linden, Nancy Ellen 1965-"],"dc:date.accessioned":["2015-08-24T03:19:19Z"],"dc:date.available":["2015-08-24T03:19:19Z"],"dc:date.issued":["2013-05"],"dc:description.abstract":["This Differential Distractor Functioning (DDF) study involved 855,023 regular education students in Grades 3, 6, and 11 in Texas. Percentage dispersion anomalies were identified in the 2009 Texas Assessment of Knowledge and Skills Item Analysis Reports provided by the Texas Education Agency. Questions addressed in this investigation were: How many students answered incorrectly on certain test items? What items had the highest frequency of a single wrong answer? Which test objectives had balanced/even dispersions? Were these dispersions similar in other grade levels? Data analyses yielded an increase in incorrect answer anomalies by 8% from Grade 3 to Grade 11. Furthermore, a 100% incorrect answer anomaly was revealed for Objective 2 – Applying Literary Elements for Grade 6 students. From these results, educational leaders need to examine more closely specific objectives and test items so that they can determine underlying reasons for students not answering these objectives and test items correctly."],"dc:format.mimetype":["application/pdf"],"dc:identifier.uri":["http://hdl.handle.net/10657/1032"],"dc:language.iso":["eng"],"dc:rights":["The author of this work is the copyright owner. UH Libraries and the Texas Digital Library have their permission to store and provide access to this work. Further transmission, reproduction, or presentation of this work is prohibited except with permission of the author(s)."],"dc:subject":["Assessments","Reading comprehension","Testing","Standardized testing","Incorrect answer options"],"dc:title":["COMPARING INCORRECT ANSWER PERCENTAGE DISPERSIONS IN STATEWIDE READING COMPREHENSION SCORES AND THEIR IMPLICATIONS FOR SCHOOL LEADERS"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Professional Leadership"],"thesis:degree_level":["Doctoral"],"thesis:degree_name":["Doctor of Education"],"thesis:institution_name":["University of Houston"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-24T02:32:58Z"}