{"id":{"repo_id":"gsu","oai_identifier":"oai:digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu:etd_legacy-1733"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/gsu/oai:digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu:etd_legacy-1733","repository":{"repo_id":"gsu","name":"Georgia Southern University","base_url":"https://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/do/oai/"},"display":{"title":"Misogynistic Language in the Comedies of Ben Jonson: Jonson's Social Commentary on a Degenerating London","abstract":"<p>Ben Jonson's comedies seem to present an almost entirely negative view of women; the plays are full of misogynistic language and their portrayal of women looks bleak. The good women in his comedies, such as Celia in <em>Volpone</em> or Dame Pliant in <em>The Alchemist</em>, are passive, weak characters who subject themselves to the rule of men, while the opinionated, strong women are either objects for ridicule like the Collegiates in <em>Epicoene</em> or are destined for death like Agrippina in <em>Sejanus</em>. While characters such as these raise questions concerning Jonson's attitude towards women there is still little research or criticism available concerning Jonson's views on women and his portrayal ofwomen in his comedies. By delving into Jonson's portrayal of women as grotesque, his apparent attacks on the character and nature of women, and his portrayal of women as masculine in his urban comedies<sup>1</sup> <em>Epicoene</em>; or <em>The Silent Woman</em> (1609), <em>Everyman in his Humour</em> (1601), <em>Volpone</em>; or <em>The Fox</em> (1605), <em>The Alchemist</em> (1610), and his city tragedy <em>Sejanus</em> (1603), I propose to explore the ways in which readers may argue Jonson is indeed a misogynist; I will also analyze the economic and social impact of these misogynistic passages to demonstrate Jonson's purpose behind them. Jonson's purpose, I shall argue, is not to malign women with his comedy; rather he comments on the general morality of society. Jonson demonstrates, through his portrayal of his characters, the artificiality and consumerism apparent in London society. Hence, Jonson is not promoting the hatred of women; rather he is making a social commentary on his perception of a degenerating London. Furthermore, I propose that Jonson cannot so easily be labeled a misogynist because, through his depiction of the Fools in his plays and through his negative representation of his amoral witty male heroes, Jonson criticizes men and women alike.</p>","abstract_html":"&lt;p&gt;Ben Jonson&#x27;s comedies seem to present an almost entirely negative view of women; the plays are full of misogynistic language and their portrayal of women looks bleak. The good women in his comedies, such as Celia in &lt;em&gt;Volpone&lt;/em&gt; or Dame Pliant in &lt;em&gt;The Alchemist&lt;/em&gt;, are passive, weak characters who subject themselves to the rule of men, while the opinionated, strong women are either objects for ridicule like the Collegiates in &lt;em&gt;Epicoene&lt;/em&gt; or are destined for death like Agrippina in &lt;em&gt;Sejanus&lt;/em&gt;. While characters such as these raise questions concerning Jonson&#x27;s attitude towards women there is still little research or criticism available concerning Jonson&#x27;s views on women and his portrayal ofwomen in his comedies. By delving into Jonson&#x27;s portrayal of women as grotesque, his apparent attacks on the character and nature of women, and his portrayal of women as masculine in his urban comedies&lt;sup&gt;1&lt;/sup&gt; &lt;em&gt;Epicoene&lt;/em&gt;; or &lt;em&gt;The Silent Woman&lt;/em&gt; (1609), &lt;em&gt;Everyman in his Humour&lt;/em&gt; (1601), &lt;em&gt;Volpone&lt;/em&gt;; or &lt;em&gt;The Fox&lt;/em&gt; (1605), &lt;em&gt;The Alchemist&lt;/em&gt; (1610), and his city tragedy &lt;em&gt;Sejanus&lt;/em&gt; (1603), I propose to explore the ways in which readers may argue Jonson is indeed a misogynist; I will also analyze the economic and social impact of these misogynistic passages to demonstrate Jonson&#x27;s purpose behind them. Jonson&#x27;s purpose, I shall argue, is not to malign women with his comedy; rather he comments on the general morality of society. Jonson demonstrates, through his portrayal of his characters, the artificiality and consumerism apparent in London society. Hence, Jonson is not promoting the hatred of women; rather he is making a social commentary on his perception of a degenerating London. Furthermore, I propose that Jonson cannot so easily be labeled a misogynist because, through his depiction of the Fools in his plays and through his negative representation of his amoral witty male heroes, Jonson criticizes men and women alike.&lt;/p&gt;","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Todd, Jessica Adrienne"],"institution":null,"degree_name":"Master of Arts","degree_level":"Thesis (restricted to Georgia Southern)","degree_discipline":"Department of Literature and Philosophy","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Caren J. Town","Candy B. K. Schille"],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2004,"date_issued":"2004-01-01T08:00:00Z","date_published":"2004-01-01T08:00:00Z","updated_at":"2026-07-24T02:28:40Z","subjects":["ETD","Ben Jonson","Comedies","Good women","Celia","Dame Pliant","Volpone","The Alchemist","English Language and Literature"],"languages":[],"rights":[],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"https://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/etd_legacy/1083","outbound_label":"Repository record","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Caren J. Town","Candy B. K. Schille"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Todd, Jessica Adrienne"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date.available","label":"Dc Date Available","values":["2015-08-20T07:00:00Z"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Department of Literature and Philosophy"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Thesis (restricted to Georgia Southern)"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Master of Arts"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["ETD","Ben Jonson","Comedies","Good women","Celia","Dame Pliant","Volpone","The Alchemist","English Language and Literature"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["https://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/etd_legacy/1083"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["<p>Ben Jonson's comedies seem to present an almost entirely negative view of women; the plays are full of misogynistic language and their portrayal of women looks bleak. The good women in his comedies, such as Celia in <em>Volpone</em> or Dame Pliant in <em>The Alchemist</em>, are passive, weak characters who subject themselves to the rule of men, while the opinionated, strong women are either objects for ridicule like the Collegiates in <em>Epicoene</em> or are destined for death like Agrippina in <em>Sejanus</em>. While characters such as these raise questions concerning Jonson's attitude towards women there is still little research or criticism available concerning Jonson's views on women and his portrayal ofwomen in his comedies. By delving into Jonson's portrayal of women as grotesque, his apparent attacks on the character and nature of women, and his portrayal of women as masculine in his urban comedies<sup>1</sup> <em>Epicoene</em>; or <em>The Silent Woman</em> (1609), <em>Everyman in his Humour</em> (1601), <em>Volpone</em>; or <em>The Fox</em> (1605), <em>The Alchemist</em> (1610), and his city tragedy <em>Sejanus</em> (1603), I propose to explore the ways in which readers may argue Jonson is indeed a misogynist; I will also analyze the economic and social impact of these misogynistic passages to demonstrate Jonson's purpose behind them. Jonson's purpose, I shall argue, is not to malign women with his comedy; rather he comments on the general morality of society. Jonson demonstrates, through his portrayal of his characters, the artificiality and consumerism apparent in London society. Hence, Jonson is not promoting the hatred of women; rather he is making a social commentary on his perception of a degenerating London. Furthermore, I propose that Jonson cannot so easily be labeled a misogynist because, through his depiction of the Fools in his plays and through his negative representation of his amoral witty male heroes, Jonson criticizes men and women alike.</p>"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Misogynistic Language in the Comedies of Ben Jonson: Jonson's Social Commentary on a Degenerating London"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Caren J. Town","Candy B. K. Schille"],"dc:creator":["Todd, Jessica Adrienne"],"dc:date.available":["2015-08-20T07:00:00Z"],"dc:description.abstract":["<p>Ben Jonson's comedies seem to present an almost entirely negative view of women; the plays are full of misogynistic language and their portrayal of women looks bleak. The good women in his comedies, such as Celia in <em>Volpone</em> or Dame Pliant in <em>The Alchemist</em>, are passive, weak characters who subject themselves to the rule of men, while the opinionated, strong women are either objects for ridicule like the Collegiates in <em>Epicoene</em> or are destined for death like Agrippina in <em>Sejanus</em>. While characters such as these raise questions concerning Jonson's attitude towards women there is still little research or criticism available concerning Jonson's views on women and his portrayal ofwomen in his comedies. By delving into Jonson's portrayal of women as grotesque, his apparent attacks on the character and nature of women, and his portrayal of women as masculine in his urban comedies<sup>1</sup> <em>Epicoene</em>; or <em>The Silent Woman</em> (1609), <em>Everyman in his Humour</em> (1601), <em>Volpone</em>; or <em>The Fox</em> (1605), <em>The Alchemist</em> (1610), and his city tragedy <em>Sejanus</em> (1603), I propose to explore the ways in which readers may argue Jonson is indeed a misogynist; I will also analyze the economic and social impact of these misogynistic passages to demonstrate Jonson's purpose behind them. Jonson's purpose, I shall argue, is not to malign women with his comedy; rather he comments on the general morality of society. Jonson demonstrates, through his portrayal of his characters, the artificiality and consumerism apparent in London society. Hence, Jonson is not promoting the hatred of women; rather he is making a social commentary on his perception of a degenerating London. Furthermore, I propose that Jonson cannot so easily be labeled a misogynist because, through his depiction of the Fools in his plays and through his negative representation of his amoral witty male heroes, Jonson criticizes men and women alike.</p>"],"dc:identifier":["https://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/etd_legacy/1083"],"dc:subject":["ETD","Ben Jonson","Comedies","Good women","Celia","Dame Pliant","Volpone","The Alchemist","English Language and Literature"],"dc:title":["Misogynistic Language in the Comedies of Ben Jonson: Jonson's Social Commentary on a Degenerating London"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Department of Literature and Philosophy"],"thesis:degree_level":["Thesis (restricted to Georgia Southern)"],"thesis:degree_name":["Master of Arts"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-24T02:28:40Z"}