{"id":{"repo_id":"gsu","oai_identifier":"oai:digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu:etd_legacy-1016"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/gsu/oai:digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu:etd_legacy-1016","repository":{"repo_id":"gsu","name":"Georgia Southern University","base_url":"https://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/do/oai/"},"display":{"title":"The Automatic Consequences of Religious Priming","abstract":"<p>Little is understood concerning the cognitive processing of religious attitudes. The limited research in this area applies schema theory to describe religious attitudes, but in doing so neglects specific cognitive processes. The present study applies cognitive processing theory to the domain of religious attitudes in order to examine whether individuals process certain types of information automatically, and how this may affect behavior. Two pilot studies suggest that being primed with religious words leads to the automatic activation of corresponding religious attitudes and that religious priming accesses a motivational state. Dijksterhuis and Bargh (2001) recently theorized that individuals demonstrate automatic behaviors because of the social advantages of assimilating to the social environment. This would suggest that regardless of one's religiosity, being primed with religious words may motivate one to conform to the perceived intents and goals of religious people. The current study examined this possibility by testing contrast and assimilation effects of primed religious words. It was predicted that an underlying social assimilation process accounted for previously found automatic behavioral effects of religious priming in a task that misled people to cheat. Results showed that participants did indeed cheat more when primed with concrete as opposed to general religious words. Contrary to predictions, however, the suggested contrast found in the concrete religious word group showed no difference when participants' cognitive capacity was manipulated. Participant's level of intrinsic religiousness also showed no effect on the tendency to cheat, failing to replicate past results. Overall, these mixed results suggest an assimilation process in religious priming. Future research is discussed that may offer better tests of the role cognitive processing plays in religious social perception and behavior.</p>","abstract_html":"&lt;p&gt;Little is understood concerning the cognitive processing of religious attitudes. The limited research in this area applies schema theory to describe religious attitudes, but in doing so neglects specific cognitive processes. The present study applies cognitive processing theory to the domain of religious attitudes in order to examine whether individuals process certain types of information automatically, and how this may affect behavior. Two pilot studies suggest that being primed with religious words leads to the automatic activation of corresponding religious attitudes and that religious priming accesses a motivational state. Dijksterhuis and Bargh (2001) recently theorized that individuals demonstrate automatic behaviors because of the social advantages of assimilating to the social environment. This would suggest that regardless of one&#x27;s religiosity, being primed with religious words may motivate one to conform to the perceived intents and goals of religious people. The current study examined this possibility by testing contrast and assimilation effects of primed religious words. It was predicted that an underlying social assimilation process accounted for previously found automatic behavioral effects of religious priming in a task that misled people to cheat. Results showed that participants did indeed cheat more when primed with concrete as opposed to general religious words. Contrary to predictions, however, the suggested contrast found in the concrete religious word group showed no difference when participants&#x27; cognitive capacity was manipulated. Participant&#x27;s level of intrinsic religiousness also showed no effect on the tendency to cheat, failing to replicate past results. Overall, these mixed results suggest an assimilation process in religious priming. Future research is discussed that may offer better tests of the role cognitive processing plays in religious social perception and behavior.&lt;/p&gt;","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Randolph-Seng, Brandon"],"institution":null,"degree_name":"Masters of Science in Psychology","degree_level":"Thesis (restricted to Georgia Southern)","degree_discipline":"Department of Psychology","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Amy Hackney","John D. Murray","Richard Rogers"],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2004,"date_issued":"2004-01-01T08:00:00Z","date_published":"2004-01-01T08:00:00Z","updated_at":"2026-07-24T02:28:00Z","subjects":["ETD","Religious attitudes","Cognitive processing","Social assimilation processes","Psychiatry and Psychology","Psychology"],"languages":[],"rights":[],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"https://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/etd_legacy/12","outbound_label":"Repository record","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Amy Hackney","John D. Murray","Richard Rogers"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Randolph-Seng, Brandon"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date.available","label":"Dc Date Available","values":["1970-01-01T08:00:00Z"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Department of Psychology"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Thesis (restricted to Georgia Southern)"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Masters of Science in Psychology"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["ETD","Religious attitudes","Cognitive processing","Social assimilation processes","Psychiatry and Psychology","Psychology"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["https://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/etd_legacy/12"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["<p>Little is understood concerning the cognitive processing of religious attitudes. The limited research in this area applies schema theory to describe religious attitudes, but in doing so neglects specific cognitive processes. The present study applies cognitive processing theory to the domain of religious attitudes in order to examine whether individuals process certain types of information automatically, and how this may affect behavior. Two pilot studies suggest that being primed with religious words leads to the automatic activation of corresponding religious attitudes and that religious priming accesses a motivational state. Dijksterhuis and Bargh (2001) recently theorized that individuals demonstrate automatic behaviors because of the social advantages of assimilating to the social environment. This would suggest that regardless of one's religiosity, being primed with religious words may motivate one to conform to the perceived intents and goals of religious people. The current study examined this possibility by testing contrast and assimilation effects of primed religious words. It was predicted that an underlying social assimilation process accounted for previously found automatic behavioral effects of religious priming in a task that misled people to cheat. Results showed that participants did indeed cheat more when primed with concrete as opposed to general religious words. Contrary to predictions, however, the suggested contrast found in the concrete religious word group showed no difference when participants' cognitive capacity was manipulated. Participant's level of intrinsic religiousness also showed no effect on the tendency to cheat, failing to replicate past results. Overall, these mixed results suggest an assimilation process in religious priming. Future research is discussed that may offer better tests of the role cognitive processing plays in religious social perception and behavior.</p>"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["The Automatic Consequences of Religious Priming"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Amy Hackney","John D. Murray","Richard Rogers"],"dc:creator":["Randolph-Seng, Brandon"],"dc:date.available":["1970-01-01T08:00:00Z"],"dc:description.abstract":["<p>Little is understood concerning the cognitive processing of religious attitudes. The limited research in this area applies schema theory to describe religious attitudes, but in doing so neglects specific cognitive processes. The present study applies cognitive processing theory to the domain of religious attitudes in order to examine whether individuals process certain types of information automatically, and how this may affect behavior. Two pilot studies suggest that being primed with religious words leads to the automatic activation of corresponding religious attitudes and that religious priming accesses a motivational state. Dijksterhuis and Bargh (2001) recently theorized that individuals demonstrate automatic behaviors because of the social advantages of assimilating to the social environment. This would suggest that regardless of one's religiosity, being primed with religious words may motivate one to conform to the perceived intents and goals of religious people. The current study examined this possibility by testing contrast and assimilation effects of primed religious words. It was predicted that an underlying social assimilation process accounted for previously found automatic behavioral effects of religious priming in a task that misled people to cheat. Results showed that participants did indeed cheat more when primed with concrete as opposed to general religious words. Contrary to predictions, however, the suggested contrast found in the concrete religious word group showed no difference when participants' cognitive capacity was manipulated. Participant's level of intrinsic religiousness also showed no effect on the tendency to cheat, failing to replicate past results. Overall, these mixed results suggest an assimilation process in religious priming. Future research is discussed that may offer better tests of the role cognitive processing plays in religious social perception and behavior.</p>"],"dc:identifier":["https://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/etd_legacy/12"],"dc:subject":["ETD","Religious attitudes","Cognitive processing","Social assimilation processes","Psychiatry and Psychology","Psychology"],"dc:title":["The Automatic Consequences of Religious Priming"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Department of Psychology"],"thesis:degree_level":["Thesis (restricted to Georgia Southern)"],"thesis:degree_name":["Masters of Science in Psychology"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-24T02:28:00Z"}