Back to results

Georgia Southern University

Antecedents of Athletes’ Achievement Goal Orientations

Abstract

dc:description.abstract

<p>Theorized by Nicholls (1984), achievement goal theory describes the interaction of one’s perceived ability and two goal orientations, known as “task” and “ego,” that an athlete employs when setting goals. These goal orientations are what athletes employ when playing their sport. The result of this interaction is an athlete’s achievement behavior. Previous research has examined this theory extensively (Newton & Duda, 1999; Chin, Khoo, & Low, 2012; Smoll, Smith, & Cumming, 2007; White & Zellner, 1996). However, few studies have solely looked at factors that predict one’s achievement goal orientations. The purpose of this study is to address which demographic variables (Division, gender, and year in school) as well as the theoretical constructs of achievement goal theory (perceived competence and motivational climate) have the most influence in understanding an athlete’s achievement goal orientations. Furthermore, this study will isolate each demographic variable and break it down into substrates (i.e. gender: male and female) to see if there were differences between them regarding the athlete’s achievement goal orientations. Participants include 143 undergraduate students from universities across the Midwest and Southeastern United States. Results of the study indicated that mastery climate and Division type scores had an impact on an athlete’s task score (<em>r </em>= .444, <em>p</em> =.001, <em>r </em>= .259, <em>p</em> =.048), while Division type was the sole predictor of an athlete’s ego scores (<em>r </em>= -.340, <em>p </em>< .05). Analysis of the demographic variables displayed a difference between Division type and ego scores (<em>T </em>(141) = 2.155, <em>p </em>= .034, <em>d</em>= .36) such that Division I (<em>M</em>= 2.91) had higher ego scores compared to Division III (<em>M</em>= 2.62).</p> <p>INDEX WORDS: sport psychology, motivation, achievement goal theory</p>

Degree

thesis:*
Name thesis:degree_name
Master of Science in Kinesiology (M.S.)
Level thesis:degree_level
Thesis (open access)
Discipline thesis:degree_discipline
Department of Health and Kinesiology
Year dc:date.available
2014

Author and committee

dc:creator, dc:contributor.*
Author dc:creator
  • Lachman, Matthew
Contributors dc:contributor
  • Daniel Czech
  • Jody Langdon

Subjects

dc:subject × 5

Identifiers

dc:identifier.*
Repository record dc:identifier
https://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/etd/1134
OAI identifier oai:identifier
oai:digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu:etd-2203

Chain of custody

source
Harvested from
Georgia Southern University
Base URL
digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/do/oai/
Last updated
2026-07-24
Source record
OAI-PMH GetRecord
citation

Lachman, Matthew. Antecedents of Athletes’ Achievement Goal Orientations. Thesis (open access) thesis, 2014. https://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/etd/1134