Documenting patterns of sessile invertebrate community development is important for predicting recovery patterns after disturbance and designing effective marine reserves. In the South Atlantic Bight, invertebrate assemblages can differ significantly from one rocky outcrop to another, but the factors driving these differences are not well understood. I tracked community development for fourteen months at four rocky outcrops at Gray’s Reef National Marine Sanctuary (GRNMS) to address the predictions that (i) developing sessile invertebrate communities in this system do not exhibit a predictable pattern of succession and (ii) recolonization patterns for small patches of open space that become available are influenced by the composition of the invertebrate community in the immediate vicinity. Community development was followed for 14 months on paving tiles (30 x 30 cm) deployed in July 2012 by photographing these tiles, along with the adjacent natural community, each month through September 2013. Species composition, percent cover, and diversity were determined each month.
Sessile invertebrate taxa colonizing tiles were similar across all four sites in the first three months after deployment, but diverged over time. At all sites, developing communities exhibited lower percent cover and diversity than their adjacent existing communities over the fourteen months of the study, but analyses of similarities (ANOSIM) did provide evidence of convergence over the long term. These results indicate that succession of sessile invertebrates is not a predictable process in this system and that the extant community plays a role in deciding the final outcome of species re-establishment. Thus, differences in invertebrate community structure among rocky outcrops likely persist in this system because the extant community influences recruitment.
","abstract_html":"<p>Documenting patterns of sessile invertebrate community development is important for predicting recovery patterns after disturbance and designing effective marine reserves. In the South Atlantic Bight, invertebrate assemblages can differ significantly from one rocky outcrop to another, but the factors driving these differences are not well understood. I tracked community development for fourteen months at four rocky outcrops at Gray’s Reef National Marine Sanctuary (GRNMS) to address the predictions that (i) developing sessile invertebrate communities in this system do not exhibit a predictable pattern of succession and (ii) recolonization patterns for small patches of open space that become available are influenced by the composition of the invertebrate community in the immediate vicinity. Community development was followed for 14 months on paving tiles (30 x 30 cm) deployed in July 2012 by photographing these tiles, along with the adjacent natural community, each month through September 2013. Species composition, percent cover, and diversity were determined each month.</p> <p>Sessile invertebrate taxa colonizing tiles were similar across all four sites in the first three months after deployment, but diverged over time. At all sites, developing communities exhibited lower percent cover and diversity than their adjacent existing communities over the fourteen months of the study, but analyses of similarities (ANOSIM) did provide evidence of convergence over the long term. These results indicate that succession of sessile invertebrates is not a predictable process in this system and that the extant community plays a role in deciding the final outcome of species re-establishment. Thus, differences in invertebrate community structure among rocky outcrops likely persist in this system because the extant community influences recruitment.</p>","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Poirson, Brittany"],"institution":null,"degree_name":"Master of Science in Biology (M.S.)","degree_level":"Thesis (open access)","degree_discipline":"Department of Biology","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Risa Cohen","Checo Colon-Gaud"],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2014,"date_issued":"2014-01-01T08:00:00Z","date_published":"2014-01-01T08:00:00Z","updated_at":"2026-07-24T02:27:52Z","subjects":["ETD","Community ecology","Succession","Recruitment","Benthic invertebrates","Gray’s Reef National Marine Sanctuary","Marine Biology"],"languages":[],"rights":[],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"https://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/etd/1103","outbound_label":"Repository record","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Risa Cohen","Checo Colon-Gaud"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Poirson, Brittany"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date.available","label":"Dc Date Available","values":["2014-04-16T07:00:00Z"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Department of Biology"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Thesis (open access)"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Master of Science in Biology (M.S.)"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["ETD","Community ecology","Succession","Recruitment","Benthic invertebrates","Gray’s Reef National Marine Sanctuary","Marine Biology"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["https://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/etd/1103"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["Documenting patterns of sessile invertebrate community development is important for predicting recovery patterns after disturbance and designing effective marine reserves. In the South Atlantic Bight, invertebrate assemblages can differ significantly from one rocky outcrop to another, but the factors driving these differences are not well understood. I tracked community development for fourteen months at four rocky outcrops at Gray’s Reef National Marine Sanctuary (GRNMS) to address the predictions that (i) developing sessile invertebrate communities in this system do not exhibit a predictable pattern of succession and (ii) recolonization patterns for small patches of open space that become available are influenced by the composition of the invertebrate community in the immediate vicinity. Community development was followed for 14 months on paving tiles (30 x 30 cm) deployed in July 2012 by photographing these tiles, along with the adjacent natural community, each month through September 2013. Species composition, percent cover, and diversity were determined each month.
Sessile invertebrate taxa colonizing tiles were similar across all four sites in the first three months after deployment, but diverged over time. At all sites, developing communities exhibited lower percent cover and diversity than their adjacent existing communities over the fourteen months of the study, but analyses of similarities (ANOSIM) did provide evidence of convergence over the long term. These results indicate that succession of sessile invertebrates is not a predictable process in this system and that the extant community plays a role in deciding the final outcome of species re-establishment. Thus, differences in invertebrate community structure among rocky outcrops likely persist in this system because the extant community influences recruitment.
"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Sessile Invertebrate Colonization on Rocky Outcrops at Gray's Reef National Marine Sanctuary"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Risa Cohen","Checo Colon-Gaud"],"dc:creator":["Poirson, Brittany"],"dc:date.available":["2014-04-16T07:00:00Z"],"dc:description.abstract":["Documenting patterns of sessile invertebrate community development is important for predicting recovery patterns after disturbance and designing effective marine reserves. In the South Atlantic Bight, invertebrate assemblages can differ significantly from one rocky outcrop to another, but the factors driving these differences are not well understood. I tracked community development for fourteen months at four rocky outcrops at Gray’s Reef National Marine Sanctuary (GRNMS) to address the predictions that (i) developing sessile invertebrate communities in this system do not exhibit a predictable pattern of succession and (ii) recolonization patterns for small patches of open space that become available are influenced by the composition of the invertebrate community in the immediate vicinity. Community development was followed for 14 months on paving tiles (30 x 30 cm) deployed in July 2012 by photographing these tiles, along with the adjacent natural community, each month through September 2013. Species composition, percent cover, and diversity were determined each month.
Sessile invertebrate taxa colonizing tiles were similar across all four sites in the first three months after deployment, but diverged over time. At all sites, developing communities exhibited lower percent cover and diversity than their adjacent existing communities over the fourteen months of the study, but analyses of similarities (ANOSIM) did provide evidence of convergence over the long term. These results indicate that succession of sessile invertebrates is not a predictable process in this system and that the extant community plays a role in deciding the final outcome of species re-establishment. Thus, differences in invertebrate community structure among rocky outcrops likely persist in this system because the extant community influences recruitment.
"],"dc:identifier":["https://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/etd/1103"],"dc:subject":["ETD","Community ecology","Succession","Recruitment","Benthic invertebrates","Gray’s Reef National Marine Sanctuary","Marine Biology"],"dc:title":["Sessile Invertebrate Colonization on Rocky Outcrops at Gray's Reef National Marine Sanctuary"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Department of Biology"],"thesis:degree_level":["Thesis (open access)"],"thesis:degree_name":["Master of Science in Biology (M.S.)"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-24T02:27:52Z"}